Notices by lobingera (lobingera@chaos.social)

@cwebber @phillycodehound

... i see on the horizon a talk at the 39C3 "Make decentralization less boring again" ...

@cwebber @phillycodehound

Yes, but where would be the fun of doing this?

@phillycodehound @cwebber

"Contrary to common understanding, the road to hell is not paved with good intentions, but with best laid plans."

#git

i somehow know how to do this manually (editing files), but what is canonical way of re-applying a commit, that was reverted?

So:

* commit A
* revert A
... other development ...
* do commit A in the same way as above

@Emily Wer schonmal versucht hat eine unwillige Ente wegzutragen, lacht jetzt laut auf ...

(Disclosure: Wir haben Laufenten im Garten)

@anderslund @malteengeler

"Greed is the mind killer"

@jwildeboer

No. IPv4 competing with IPv6 is ?

@jwildeboer

I remember the time when there was 3GPP and 3GPP2 ...

@jwildeboer Feature creep in hardware also?

@slothrop neighbor cat below our bed

@jwildeboer

"Also to at the very least the ability to mark a reply as "not wanted"" - that's actually something new (afaik the discussion). Is this an option in a system you know/use?

@slothrop "6 weeks of engineering can save you 1 afternoon in the library"

@jwildeboer btw: are there known support groups (e.g. NGOs)?

@jwildeboer In my industry/work there is a lot of discussions on problems and solutions in documents (or as paper trail on email reflectors) therefore sometime state of the art can be documented to the day. And sometimes the day before filing something else.

Your rule of thump will work well in classical patenting - looking at publication dates of the PO

@jwildeboer Agree on the confusion.

What i meant is: You will not get protection *before* the agreed priority date - which might be a filing in another jurisdiction.

There was a time in USPO where they accepted "company documents" as proof of an "idea date" and that was a nightmare for both the PO and the companies trying to object. With the filing data many things got very, very clear.

@jwildeboer This might be a wording issue ... but i'm not aware of a jurisdiction that provides protection retroactively. Patents are protected from the priority date which is the filing date. The granting date might be later - after some (or many) iterations of checks by the patent office. The 12 (or 18) months time is the publication date which follows the filing date.

@_elena @cwebber on the "do the know this?" - people early on bsky (esp. in the invite-only phase) are pretty much aware, recent newbies might have missed this information

@jwildeboer Das habe ich nicht geschrieben.

@jwildeboer Entweder man möchte Chancengleichheit - oder man möchte Elitenreproduktion.

Du solltest dich entscheiden, für was DU einstehst.

(als Arbeiterkind, das die akademische Leiter ohne viel Gebühren erklommen hat, bich ich leider etwas einseitg bei dem Thema)

@jwildeboer a) Beitragsbemessungsgrenze
b) Sozialversicherung aus allen Einkünften
c) Tatsächlich ist der Beitragsatz variabel

-> Das Problem ist nicht existent.