Notices by Yvan DS 🗺️ :ferris: :go: (yvandasilva@hachyderm.io)

@skinnylatte I think this happens to every group, regardless of what the group is about.
Maybe there is even a term for it but I think it comes with the need to belong to a certain identity group and then put fences on what defines the group to "protect the image one's have about the group".

Pretty sure someone way smarter than me could express it clearly :D

@skinnylatte You are amazing 👍️

Welcome to Switzerland 🫶 :)

@skinnylatte sign me in. That's so cool!

@thomasfuchs The toxicity of all this AI garbage knows no boundaries.

What a mess.

@thomasfuchs https://just.systems/

Just !

@thomasfuchs it was already like that before the AI Hype.
IT went uncontrolled for decades due to being a money printing machine.

@mekkaokereke This is the way!

@aral TLDR: all views are good if they align with mine...

😮💨 Seriously... We should all start to have social courses at uni no matter the branch / speciality we follow...

#fediverse do you know if there is a shared moderation for the fediverse?
Let me tldr:
- does the protocol support partial federation? (I.e exclude the instances you don't federate with [chain of federation])
- is there a way to share rules (infrigments History of some rules)
- a global pool of rules / offenses that is sharable and recognized by many communities ? In order to do grouped rule filtering etc.

Maybe I just need to read the spec ;)

@nova I like your attitude :D

@nova @b0rk @tbroyer @ungleich @filippo I didn't know about them.
Hello ? @ungleich

@nova ?? hard question.
Heart says no. Economy and income needs says yes.

@nova I wonder if ZincSearch could be used instead, elastic search is quite a beast to tweak at large scale.

@nova ?

Much less stress to play the up to date game.
Less worries about stupid hashtags.
Content here is a lot more accurate, interesting and human.
Since I parked it, it also sent totally bonkers on negativity and harassment so it comforts me to not use it.

@nova That's neat ! Thanks for sharing.

@nova Your work seems very interesting :)

wow
#h7m #hachyderm

@LunaFoxgirlVT @spider623
Yes, that's basically my point.
Federation happens at a server to server level, it's basically automation and not very human except in the manual exclusion list.

So I wonder if some "affinity score" or something wouldn't help.
Making it generic would also avoid flame-wars between servers but instead focus on being globally good on all fronts.

@LunaFoxgirlVT @spider623 Having the eco-system finding some kind of equilibrium seems like an interesting idea to me.
Pretty sure there is already plenty of protocols out there that have something alike that could be included into the fediverse.

@LunaFoxgirlVT I am wondering if the protocol shouldn't have something about instances affinities with other instances.

Not for people obviously, but for instances it would make sense to have other instances tell you their affinity with so and so with an optional comment if possible.

The reasons could be many.
- problems like you just mention
- problems of federation (noisy traffic)
- poor uptime
- ...

Etc.