Notices by bmaxv (bmaxv@noc.social)

@dalias @baldur

Close, but not exactly.

I want to say it like: "there are already hundreds of script kiddies causing massive damage, but now there are ten of them that have become so efficient, they do 200% of the damage the rest of the are already doing."

I'm not calling the damage "good".

I'm calling the threat more extreme, warranting more attention and investment to prevent it.

@baldur My argument "pro" AI, particularly when it comes to serious applications like journalism and science, is that it reveals a weaknesses in current approaches.

If a homework, "proof of skill" or publication paper can be written by AI, it can't be that significant. Or the process for checking it can't be that good. Or if it can be useful, it's just not worth doing that by hand anymore.

And yes, that's destroying an industry to some degree.

Doesn't solve the licensing/Art question though.

@ErikUden sure, but that's in the terms of almost all online products.

If you don't agree to them, you can probably not post online.

And by the way, where *are* e.g. mastodon.social's TOS? Not the moderation rules, the actual TOS?

Because mastodon.social/terms gives me a 404...

Hmmm where are those for mastodon.de Mr. Vertretungsberechtigter? 😜

@BeAware I do, but then there should have been a hashtag in the message?

Is there a #mastodon #fediverse "Why am I seeing this post" function?

"post" -> rule -> filter -> "you followed x person/group"

Because I just saw a post that I can't place. Not my server. Not a person I follow. Not boosted by a person I follow.

Maybe something for the... "three dot menu" button?

@liztai Not sure if I count. But at least the bug reports and reproduction are because it's the software I use and the bug is a problem for me?

It's like picking up litter. In my living space.

The code I open source is stuff that I made because I "needed" it and that may or may not be useful to other people and I don't mind giving it away.

I am not aware that anyone is actually using it, but it's there just in case.

@evan I'm open to paying for actually valuable and consistent information.

But I don't think anyone on the fediverse has ideas or thoughts that are so significantly above average that they are worth paying for.