@sun Bill Gates rather purchased an unlimited license.
The original author of Dirty OS copied part of it from another OS, but who it was copied from didn't pursue the matter as it would really be an embarrassment for people to know that part of the turd came from you.
@1HommeAzerty Actual non-proprietary AI is actually ecologically reasonable, as it actually can do something useful like highlight possible cancers in an image that a human would often miss.
The current proprietary software and SaaSS offerings are more like artificial stupidity - although they can churn out the stupidity faster than a human, it's arguably of lesser stupidity than what a human can pull off.
That software is updated in lockstep with Linux and is clearly massive derivative works, even though it happens to run on different processors in different memory spaces.
One of the files even contains a copy of Linux without the source code.
>gplv2-only is such a scum license That is a free license, so merely licensing under it is never scummy.
What is scummy is licensing -only for the sole reason to pervert freedom, by not enforcing your license when it comes to proprietary software, but enforcing it when it comes to free software, licensed under the GPLv3-or-later.
@Aviz@Aether >experiment it on the ISS, which has no gravity at all The ISS has plenty of gravity, it's just falling so fast it keeps missing the ground.
It's called microgravity.
A baby may possibly form with defects under lower than 1G gravity, but under microgravity it will just be aborted (experiments with rats, or was it insects detailed that for anything to hatch/be born required 1G gravity for at least the initial development stages).