Intel's graphics drives are somewhat inefficient. This doesn't show up on recent CPUs, because they are fast enough to keep up anyway. But if you pair an Intel graphics card with a CPU from five years ago, the performance bottleneck is now the CPU.
This is a problem because Intel's graphics cards are cheaper than anything current from AMD or Nvidia, making them look like a good option for people with tight budgets... Who would still be more likely to be using older CPUs.
Showing off their boobs and butts in form-fitting costumes (more costumes than space-suits) made by a man counts as one of the greatest triumphs of feminism.
Apparently the Real Astronauts vetoed pockets on their costumes, because pockets would make their hips look big. I remember Neil Armstrong having the same complaint, but he wasn't a Stronk Empowered Womyn so he just accepted the unflattering pockets.
This problem is predictable with the RTX 5090, which draws 575W over a connector rated for a maximum of 600W. 5% out of tolerance and your card is fried.
There's a surprise. Now guess the ethnicity of the co-founder charged with fraud. Type it in as a response to this poast before checking. Go on. Do it. Now see if you guessed right.
@Humpleupagus Probably, but it will be interesting to see what happens
Embed this noticeAether ??? (aether@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 14-Mar-2025 20:13:26 JST
Aether ???OpenAI warns that China will take the lead in stochastic garbage generators, colloquially called "AI", if they are not allowed free reign to ingest all copyrighted data regardless of the wishes of the rights holders, which curiously is not as one-sided and self-serving as it might seem at first glance.
Copyright law prevents you from making copies of protected works. It doesn't prevent you from reading them or learning from them. It doesn't mean you can't cite them, use facts from them, remake the ideas from them.
Anyone who has reached Uni will know this. That's the whole point of books, after all.
There are particularly egregious cases such as when Meta torrented 82TB of books and then not having the manners to seed afterwards. Strictly speaking, if you paid for the books, or borrowed them from a source that did, and you don't reproduce copies, you are complying with copyright law.
What OpenAI is asking for is federal clarification of what the law is due to a flood of varying state laws and district court decisions currently all differing views on the question.
The Ars commentariat helpfully clarifies this issue by being so stridently and consistently wrong about everything.