@lanodan@Zergling_man He did invite his viewers to tell their own printer horror stories in the comment section, which was fun.
The last printer I owned was an HP, and it finally angered me so bad that I picked it up, took it outside and threw it as hard as I could at the cement driveway, in rage. I have never owned a printer since then and I never will. The rare times I need to print, I take it to a FedEx Store.
@lanodan@Zergling_man I tried to find a good standalone flatbed scanner and it seems like the market is now almost 100% cheap shitty ones, and a few super expensive ones.
@Zergling_man@sun Oh yeah, the firmware of scanners is always hosed.
Also proprietary cartridges is yet another issue with inkjets but even with rechargeable ones (pro laser printers are btw) inkjets are high-maintenance horseshit which everyone should have stopped buying ~10 years ago.
@Zergling_man@lanodan most scanners now are all in one scanner/printers, and some of them do in fact require fresh ink cartridges before they will even scan! There was a lawsuit against Canon for this, and HP has started doing it.
@lanodan >the only reason printers are getting better What are you even on about?
Printers are getting worse and even less reliable.
I've come across a HP printer that had a "don't plug this in, use wireless" sticker over the usb connector and surprise, surprise wireless did not work, but wired did at first (but soon proceeded to stop working).
Sure more now supports IPP, but even then they always find a way to fail to print.
@sun Meanwhile my 80s dot matrix printer manual came with a programming guide to make your own drivers, because it predates drivers (every command's escape codes written out etc). Too bad modern software only prints in graphics mode! :ablobcatbongoangry:
"Yes please, print this text document as an image" :ablobcatgooglytrash:
Although, my GNU/bro has told me that he smells a proprietary rat within the foundation, as he found that many things they publish are under proprietary licenses and a related blog recommends proprietary things and doesn't accept patches, as the author refuses to publish the blog article markup under a free license.
@mangeurdenuage@sun@Zergling_man@lanodan I keep telling people "we need a Free Hardware Foundation" and everyone keeps not taking me seriously yet retracing my logic from first principles back to the same conclusion.
@Zergling_man@lanodan@sun watched the video his issue was dried up ink He should have gone with a printer easier to obtain ink and print heads for like the old HP desk jets
@sun@lanodan@Zergling_man Sadly I have to print every day. I mail a couple of parcels every day for my eBay side hustle. Every one of them needs a short letter and a documentation cum insert leaflet. My printer is a Brother 2740. It's been solid for many years. Full support under Linux. Picks paper no matter how thick the stack is, down to the last sheet. HP is generally trash in my experience. The last good printer they did was LaserJet 4.
@mangeurdenuage@ThatWouldBeTelling@Zergling_man@lanodan@romin@sun Not pictured: 160W rated TDP, miniITX-levels of connectivity in an mATX-sized motherboard, next-generation POWER isn't actually libre because IBM reasons I'm already roasting to death in the summer with a 65W CPU.
@ThatWouldBeTelling@mangeurdenuage@Zergling_man@lanodan@sun Free Software was built by a bunch of guys sharing software and building on top of it. The correct answer for Free Hardware is sharing schematics, drawings, and BOMs, and assembling the computer/printer/whatever together your own bad self. The problem is that Electrical Engineers with a love of freedom are a lot scarcer to come by than programmers. Even if the FTC ruling doesn't get overturned and there's no more non-competes ever again (rest in piss), you're still asking a professional engineer that gets at least six digits to work in their spare time for free.
@mangeurdenuage@idiot@Zergling_man@lanodan@sun You also need a lot of money especially if you want your hardware to be affordable, and much, much better governance than the FSF for example.
For profit companies have an implicit advantage there, if they completely screw up they stop making money. Whereas Gnu Hurd is still on its road to nowhere thirty four years after it formally started.
But with money also comes temptation, see the Raspberry Pi for example (switched over to prioritizing companies that embed their stuff, is now doing an IPO).
I can't think of any high volume open hardware projects that either avoided that fate (of course Raspberry Pi actually wasn't very open, but that's in part on Broadcom etc. and the latter's making too many of a certain chip) or got anywhere, see for example lowRISC which was founded to make a very interesting RISC-V chip, as in they talked about what it would cost to make N-thousand working ones, and ended up being a consulting company.
See also how much it costs up front to make good injection molded plastic parts for packaging, that's generally needed for high volume parts for consumers. Every time you see something that's metal, CNC machined, and/or 3D printed you know it's going to be extra expensive.
@idiot@Zergling_man@ThatWouldBeTelling@mangeurdenuage@sun Well next step would be somewhat trusted foundries (fablabs but good? :D) in the style of distros because let's face it, not everyone wants to have that in their garage, nor can take the time to build those things.
And I don't think the hardware part should be anywhere near gratis, heck even back when distros needed floppies/CD/DVDs to be shared around you'd pay for those (which is one of the many reasons why libre software must also waive commercial rights).
@romin@idiot@ThatWouldBeTelling@Zergling_man@lanodan@sun Nothing is certain, the current accumulation of hardware backdoors, bugs and restriction over time is starting to piss of more and more people, the same way more and more people are getting angry at microsoft.
But I wouldn't be surprised to end up seeing things like FCC / CE / … take a lot more care in certifying electronics in like a decade, specially ones where internet and radio is involved (which is like 99% of computers).
Quite like how at first cars were something you could just build in your garage while now you need multiple certifications to do this.
@idiot@Zergling_man@lanodan@mangeurdenuage@sun Cross our fingers on the FTC non to non-competes, but its prospects aren't generically good since its head is an activist who doesn't care if what she orders is legal, and is being regularly slapped down by the courts.
Would also severely screw over California for what that's worth....
Speaking as someone who's worked for a few hardware companies back in the days, and did some fiddling around with electronics before college (OK, got some mad soldering skills out of that) and my family was also in the business, I think much of the rest of what you say is wrong including on salaries, but I don't have real knowledge of the latter today.
So I see "sharing schematics, drawings, and BOMs, and assembling the computer/printer/whatever together your own bad self...."
And I also see "and then a miracle occurs" where a bunch of surface mount parts get placed on a (multilayer??!?!!!???) PCB and soldered into place.
See also connectors, cables, and all the fun that comes with them and how they too can fail. I see people tearing their hair out trying to debug all the things which can go wrong.
You're also going to either go crazy trying to buy the parts in tiny or normal quantities which will be insanely expensive, or now you're back to a company buying them in normalish quantities and parceling them out into kits, along with PCBs that I hope they test.
And not entirely cheaply because they'll have to do something about customer support for those debugging issues, which can also include replacing damaged stuff.
@ThatWouldBeTelling@idiot@Zergling_man@lanodan@sun >You're also going to either go crazy trying to buy the parts in tiny or normal quantities which will be insanely expensive The market is really fucked because of that already if you at https://yewtu.be/search?q=channel%3AUCl2mFZoRqjw_ELax4Yisf6w+parts He already explains that brands like apple even go as far as forbidding manufacturers from selling smd components aside them, idk how that's legal in the US, but it shouldn't be allowed. But still people are able to find some because black market and other various ways because the demand is high.
@romin@idiot@Zergling_man@lanodan@mangeurdenuage@sun Yeah, RISC-V is totally a Worse is Better, New Jersey macroarchitecture, they even go so far as to say "well, C and Java don't care about this..." in the official architecture document not long after they launched.
But you're already going to have to compromise a lot to have open hardware, so adding instructions to check for integer overflow etc. probably isn't a huge thing if you can get a fast enough part to begin with.
As to your two previous comments, we're talking about the 1% who for example already run a Linux/BSD desktop. And we have to start somewhere, there's always going to be a supply chain, software or hardware.
@mangeurdenuage@ThatWouldBeTelling@Zergling_man@lanodan@romin@sun At this point, I feel like the only way I'd be able to get away with it is a "snake a bunch of optical cables across your house and stick the actual computer hardware in the basement" solution like Linus did with his house. Except I'm not an exceptionally wealthy Youtuber with my own mansion.
@idiot@ThatWouldBeTelling@Zergling_man@lanodan@sun >you're still asking a professional engineer that gets at least six digits to work in their spare time for free. Since when they don't get paid for their work ? The only thing hardware freedom does is to enable other people to also be able to work (and own) on the said hardware with no restriction. Aka a true free market.