My favourite example is how many people assume that the recoil spring does anything in a blowback action aside from pushing the bolt into battery. But I made calculations for some common guns (such as AR9), and it never delivers more than 1% of the force resisting the bolt thrust when firing, and less than 0.2% for larger calibers like 10mm. The whole work of keeping the breech closed is done by the mass of the bolt. Spring does absolutely nothing!
Some of the blowback actions, such as Astra 600, have heavy recoil springs. But they only do that in order to improve the longevity of the gun.
P.S. I did not look into the numbers for the Oerlikon 20mm. I don't have the data or the time. Yes, its recoil spring is crazy strong, enough to require a pulley to charge. Even so, it may yet fall under the 1% - this is how great the bolt thrust of 20mm cartridge is.
@shibao@evelyn@animeirl@kaia@vivi@meso@lucy@anemone I'd just get a modern AR-10. I have a CETME-L and while it's quite enjoyable, it's practical value is a bit suspect. Night sight dots have long since fell out. Also it's heavy! Not quite BAR heavy, but AK feels lightweight in comparison.
@shibao I was wondering how it was possible for the average to be this low. If you divide guns by population, then sure. But these studies supposedly remove the gunless.
Then one day my wife told me about her friend, who has "a Colt". She is a widow and inherited it from her dead husband. I presume it's a 1911 and not a SAA or Pocket Hammerless. But apparently there's a ton of people who only have one or two. They skew the average.
@hj Yeah but if they don't stick to the print, then you should be able to peel them off by hand. For some of the more convoluted prints, I upped the horizontal distance to 120% of shell.
Ian McCollum posted a video on SVT-40, talking about its seminal gas system, among other things, but he neglected to mention one of its most unusual features: the barrel has no gas port. The front part, which includes the gas diverter and the set for regulator, front sight tower, and the muzzle brake, is made in one piece, and attaches to the actual barrel as a muzzle device. Heck I think it's not rifled.
The gas port phobia around the 1930s was a real thing, and that is why early Garands and G.41 had gas traps. But in case of SVT-40, there's no trap as we recognize it, only a barrel extension.
Also! Every time someone talks shop on a forum, we always have the weak-minded come in with "but the barrel is not preeeeeeented", "but my AR is so much cheeeeeeper". Look how scared the 3D made them. Print more guns!
@Rocc I am not Jerry Miculek, but I think that the only time you need to account for height over bore is when aiming for the head A zone at closer than 10 yards.