RE: https://mediaformat.org/2026/07/nuages-says-hello/
Announcing it here publicly for the first time!
I've been building a general purpose activitypub pwa.
Follow @nuages for official updates!
RE: https://mediaformat.org/2026/07/nuages-says-hello/
Announcing it here publicly for the first time!
I've been building a general purpose activitypub pwa.
Follow @nuages for official updates!
Impromptu presentation about Trust and Safety for the Fediverse
Live now
https://ubc.ca.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=5b809cb7-4892-4a26-befb-b49d0178e988
@evan wishing you all a fun and productive session!
Reposting with alt text
@silverpill just yourself, but will try the group too!
@silverpill following you from my Wordpress account, also seems to have an issue with Accept, I haven’t dug into the logs, but the Follow is pending despite receiving your activities
@tchambers how would it be done to us, and by whom?
I just don’t see Mastodon trying to turn the fedi into Teams?
@tchambers what is the value of a so-called social web if it is going to be populated with agents?
@evan mastodon’s approaches is interesting in this regard, it returns embedded objects for local items, and references for remote objects. Best of both
@laurenshof @cwebber nice!
One push back I would give about Eugen’s quote is about the number of api endpoints…
I haven’t checked the exact number mastodon has added since 2019, but I’m fairly certain it’s more than those needed by C2S (inbox, outbox, proxy, uploadMedia)!
@nlnet @dansup congrats on the funding! are the comment controls related to GoToSocials implementation? Is there or will there be a FEP?
@dansup does it prevent Bob, Larry from re-adding Jane, or this just applies to Dan?
@evan @liaizon I haven't yet got to evaluating ALL the servers from @smallcircles delightful list, but my list is growing https://github.com/mediaformat/c2s
@mkljczk @evan clarification about "public" https://cosocial.ca/@evan/116093176538687513
@evan not sure if you ran into @mkljczk at FOSDEM but she runs her instance and contributes to the software!
@silverpill sounds like I’ll need to do some testing! Thx for the perspective
@silverpill thanks, I tend to prefer the incorrect but interoperable version.
So in Mitra under this model, your server receives a FO reply from a mastodon user, I’m guessing without object proofs, how can mitra forward this FO message to your audience?
Or how can non FEP-171b servers treat those messages, wouldn’t they be discarded?
Great to read all the responses to this poll!
I think the Conversation Containers proposal, comes closest to this
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/171b/fep-171b.md
What I'm unsure of if how a Mastodon Reply to this type of post interacts with the model
@silverpill does the OP appear as FO to the mastodon user, does the Mastodon user reply with their FO collection?
developer, dadcooperatives, governance, anarchism, feminism, queer theory, anti-racism, music, languagesMontréalais en exile / Éireannach📍#Edmonton / Amiskwaciwâskahikan / ᐊᒥᐢᑲᐧᒋᐋᐧᐢᑲᐦᐃᑲᐣ#nobot #nobots #noAI
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.