The International Olympic Committee has decided the sex of competitors will be determined by the SRY gene marking 'female' competitors.
Of course this leads to an amusing contradiction: there will be people who are required to compete in the men's event, but who's drug testing will have to happen using women's protocols because their genes could never produce a penis.
But beyond amusement, some initial thoughts -- not on Olympic sport, there will be plenty of commentary on the elites in the media -- but on community sport.
Olympic standards are often adopted far beyond the Olympics themselves. This is a worry with about 0.1% of people having some Difference in Sex Development. A volunteer sports administrator -- who is a car mechanic the rest of the week -- is going to be telling a person that a supposedly low-stakes genetic test has results which say "sorry, you are not the gender you have been living all your life and that your exterior sexual organs suggest" and "by the way, you're infertile". They may be saying this to someone so young as to not be sure what any of sex, gender and infertility is or means for their life.
Governments need to very quickly step in here and set regulations for the conduct of the test, communication of the results, and who pays for the test and the fallout. Since the sport requires the test (rather than a simple statement of gender from the competitor), the sport should foot the bill for the fallout. Someone just wanting to swim in 'masters' ex-amateur-age swimming shouldn't be footing the bill for complex and specialist counselling because the organisation is following Olympic rules so that their swimming sessions can use a Commonwealth-funded swimming pool.
The fetishisation of the Olympics by funding bodies also needs to end. Chess has a women's category because of gender issues: FIDE recognises that women face more obstacles learning and playing chess, and wants to give women a class in which to have enjoyable and competitive games. Determining the gender class using the presence of particular hormones during puberty is to completely miss the point. This rationale is hardly unique to chess, and it at odds with the athletics focus of the IOC's approach.
#olympics