@glent@swacknificent@scott@blogdiva I’m all for programs like this as proof of concept and proof of demand. Yes, this obviously should be a properly funded program that actually works at population scale. Test runs like this that bust doors down and break web sites with traffic are a step toward that.
@swacknificent@inthehands@scott@blogdiva There are over a million e-bikes sold in the USA each year. This program will fund 1,500 e-bikes. So yeah, if you want one then be quick with the mouse on launch day.
@NNN@scott@blogdiva The means testing is tempting, but makes the process •immensely• more complicated: harder to apply, harder to administer, less bang for the buck.
They just need to increase the budget for the program by 5-10x.
Re RadPower etc: a lot of those bikes aren't built to spec. RadWagons chronically need chain replacements, esp in MN. I don't want to stick high-need folks with so-cheap-it's-expensive bikes.
Our adult children (who don't own cars) tried for the MN rebate and failed. I'd suggest that it be limited to 100% Area Media Income, and $750 per bike, on a purchase of $1500 or less.
Also, the state needs to work with suppliers like Lectric, Aventon, Radio Flyer and RadPower to make sure attainable, UL listed ebikes are available. SorryNotSorry, Riese&Müller.
I want to get ebikes to people who will use them for transport.