You seem to have inverted the perspective of my claim, but I believe the two EOs (given there limitations at the federal level, which I think will be incredibly influential to public opinion even though some states have enshrined gender identity into law) fix self id and ban invasive treatments to children to "transition" . The EOs themselves vilify gender ideology in their own but don't say much about what other people can say in non official contexts.
Does that address your post or do I misunderstand?
I would suggest that there is a "female brain", its neurons have have XX chromosomes and not XY. Do we know that the female brain is more or less intelligent as the male brain? No, they seem the same. There are some very small differences we can see on certain 3D tasks, this doesn't tell us that female brains are better or worse, but hint at how brains might work (we don't really know how they do).
It's like a layer of obfuscation around immigration has been torn off in the public debate across the world. You can really see it in Canada which used to really love lots of fluffy happy language around it.
I think there are defensible positions against H1-Bs. It's not slavery, people are free to not apply for them, but it does raise questions for the average person as to how all this works. I.e., why do we have these programs in the most powerful nation on earth with the best schools that should just be able to make more, say, software engineers the way India can?
I think the reality is the knobs that control the number of software engineers being produced in India vs. the number in America and the number that come here is a decision made by just a few people and is largely obfuscated to the public. It seems like some complicated game between global powers..."fine, you make more software engineers, we'll let some come here so you can buy more of our stuff...don't descend into war because that will cost me as well, I also don't want any crazy terrorist acts...I'm going to keep putting my investments into natural gas fracking and ensuring my companies have a foot print in your country..."
Companies in America prefer an apparently competent person from another country vs. a graduate from a domestic 3rd tier computer science program. The reality is that both of these people will probably be doing a bullshit job. The person from the other country is, probably, more competent (has to justify doing the job to the government) and will have a harder time going to a competitor/another job in the US.
There would be a more interesting discussion to have if we started with the premise that most of these jobs are bullshit jobs and I think would reveal a lot of the underlying interests driving the "debate".
Ah. I had forgotten it was there. I don't know why he would think the bio is something terribly important. Fwiw I put it there as a bit of a silly joke but also meant to tell spinster users . There used to be a lot more discussion on basic molecular biology.