Notices by feld (feld@friedcheese.us), page 7
-
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 22:59:05 JST 
feld
@vikingkong @gabriel
DELTA CHAT
Try it guys it's great -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 10:38:52 JST
feld
Financial advice from the NYTimes -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 09:29:53 JST
feld
@phnt @splitshockvirus Not Perl anymore, but awk and sed -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 09:26:59 JST
feld
@RandomDamage Well I look forward to continue to see you proven wrong as these criticisms have been completely baseless for at least 8 years now and its momentum only grows more and more -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 09:20:56 JST
feld
YANG GANG 2028 -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 09:17:07 JST
feld
@sun PERFECT -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 09:15:33 JST
feld
@RandomDamage That's why we have regulated exchanges who have to follow the law and give you your coins or dollars when you cash out. -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 09:11:08 JST
feld
“Donald Trump and his transition team are already breaking the law,” Warren said in a post on the social platform X. “I would know because I wrote the law. Incoming presidents are required to prevent conflicts of interest and sign an ethics agreement.”
“This is what illegal corruption looks like,” she added
And legal corruption looks like...? -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 09:04:24 JST
feld
@RandomDamage > Have you seen the transaction volume of currency exchanges?
Wait do you think Bitcoin *trading* can only happen at 7 transactions per second? -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 06:41:29 JST
feld
Democrats have one option: go hard against the tariffs once they wreck the economy. Worked just fine in 1932
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Senate_Passes_Smoot_Hawley_Tariff.htm -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 05:20:37 JST
feld
@rainwarrior great guy, loved his labyrinth. -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 05:18:07 JST
feld
it's extremely painful to find A Working Solution to needing to update the Cache-Control on all your S3 objects while retaining all the other metadata fields.
This is the only solution I can find -- using s3cmd. The regular s3cli doesn't work, nor do libraries for various languages I've tried.
s3cmd --recursive modify --add-header="Cache-Control:public, max-age=608400" --acl-private s3://your-bucket/ -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 05:15:57 JST
feld
@RandomDamage you're comparing it to the wrong layer of monetary transactions. You have to put Bitcoin in the same class as "moving gold across the ocean" and then look at what you build *on top of it* like Lightning. Lightning has its own quirks, but it no TPS limit.
Additionally there will be a lot more individual transactions moving money using USDC/USDT or Paypal's new PYUSD. And then you have specialized networks like Ripple which are taking on Visa/Mastercard and slower bank rails between countries.
All of these are tools that move value much better than the traditional rails. -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 05:08:24 JST
feld
@barrett there's a stand alone Sbarro's down here now haha -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 04:02:15 JST
feld
@Hyolobrika @toast @ignaloidas decentralized DNS still needs a financial model or the entire scheme falls apart. You can't let people own domains in perpetuity and you can't allow them to squat on all the good names for free. Without a market it just won't work. -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 03:42:16 JST
feld
@cjd I'd be willing to bet the vote against secession was purely a self-preservation measure. They knew secession would have massively negative economic repercussions, so it would be better to continue fighting this through whatever legal avenues were available.
I bet the same thing would happen today. People know a civil war would be a terrible thing to have to deal with and tons of conservatives would be against it, but once it starts you pick your side. What other option do you have in that scenario? -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 03:38:53 JST
feld
@cjd ok, but how does that change anything? The people with the political power disagreed and pushed to secede over slavery anyway and the slave-holders didn't fight against the Confederacy, they joined it. -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 03:00:12 JST
feld
@RandomDamage money is layered, it has been for hundreds of years. That's why we had gold and silver certificates instead of walking around with gold and silver. -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 02:29:22 JST
feld
@cjd the only novel and interesting information provided is "non-slaveholders in the south probably didn't want to secede" but that doesn't mean they didn't agree with keeping slavery as the status quo. So it's completely meaningless.
Who cares that the people in the south who didn't have power didn't want what happened to happen?
There is not and never has been a social movement of people in the American south who identify with this forgotten historical group and want us to know that they didn't like the Confederacy either.
It's an interesting footnote in history, but has no material impact on anything we already know. The people maligned are those who had the power to start the war -- and everyone who supported or joined them. Those people who didn't want to secede could have en-masse fled to the north. But they didn't, did they? -
Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Nov-2024 02:17:15 JST
feld
@cjd maybe it would believable if they didn't make it the major theme of their secession paperwork. I don't know why anyone thinks we can rewrite history. They straight up told the world what the reason was -- they didn't want their slaves taken away. They wanted their "property" to not be taken away and they wanted to keep the economic engine they built upon them.
Georgia: "The people of Georgia having dissolved their political connection with the Government of the United States of America, present to their confederates and the world the causes which have led to the separation. For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery."
Mississippi: "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world."
South Carolina: "Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection."
Texas: "Texas abandoned her separate national existence and consented to become one of the Confederated Union to promote her welfare, insure domestic tranquility and secure more substantially the blessings of peace and liberty to her people. She was received into the confederacy with her own constitution, under the guarantee of the federal constitution and the compact of annexation, that she should enjoy these blessings. She was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery-- the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits-- a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which her people intended should exist in all future time. Her institutions and geographical position established the strongest ties between her and other slave-holding States of the confederacy. Those ties have been strengthened by association. But what has been the course of the government of the United States, and of the people and authorities of the non-slave-holding States, since our connection with them?"
Virginia: "The people of Virginia, in their ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, adopted by them in Convention on the twenty-fifth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty-eight, having declared that the powers granted under the said Constitution were derived from the people of the United States, and might be resumed whensoever the same should be perverted to their injury and oppression; and the Federal Government, having perverted said powers, not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression of the Southern Slaveholding States."
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the