Notices by soothspider (soothspider@gigaohm.bio)

It's also odd that they spent like 6 months parading around the idea that they were going to test HouseLyndseyRN for spike production (e.g. "integration" of the mRNA sequence) and as far as I can tell, the only integration was in her gut. (e.g. microbiome).

Which also raises so many other questions. How did any of the gut bacteria get this mRNA? The LNPs crossed into there I suppose. Yet, exosomes and phages can cross back into the body... what exactly do antibodies do then? (Certainly more than one thing as the body has shown in virtually every other metabolic cycle – e.g. insulin isn't single purpose either.)

Unsure but WTH? Just happened. I haven't interacted with her directly for a while (don't even see her posts actually; despite having followed her for a while).

So I'm going to say officially that this forum is monitored. Otherwise someone please explain the timing.

I'd actually argue that all you really need is a Biology 12 or 1st year University level Biology to understand and explain it.

However Biology is so complex that unless you've been refreshing along the way, most people have forgotten what they do know (even if what they know is wrong). I guess it's similar in Physics and Chemistry (lots of details that one forgets).

This is why on the internet, you see pictures of photosynthesis (cycle diagram) and people excitedly scream "Krebs Cycle!" (It's the Calvin Cycle.) Because they kinda remembered it from HS when they had to memorize how much ATP gets created in the cycle (including in the electron transport chain), but forgot it's cellular respiration.

So for anyone trying to explain why transfections (asking your cells to express a foreign protein through an inserted mRNA strand) is bad, they must remember the mechanics of protein synthesis as well as the idea/fact that proteins get presented on the surface for inspection. Then they have to tie this into "common knowledge". For example, why are immunosuppressants used for organ transplant patients?

Basically walk from the top and explain it until it's at the level they no longer comprehend. The difficulty actually lies with people in a field where they should understand this. The show the greatest amount of cognitive dissonance in my experience. Yet even then, you can get them thinking if it's in an area they haven't had training against (e.g. IgG's trying to cross the blood lung barrier, why it's not transudation and why the mucosal layer orientation is the most important). Once you have a crack, you can approach them again later.

Also, the closer they are to you, the less likely they are to listen to you. It's an extremely weird human trait.

Sure, but people usually LIKE the post that got the follow (or otherwise interacted with it). Anyhow, sus... just know that we're probably monitored as well.

TIL: Soapbox powers Truth Social (e.g. is the front-end).

https://soapbox.pub/blog/releasing-soapbox-3.0/

This is the biggest release of Soapbox ever. What started out as a fork of Gab's 2019 UI has now become a mainstay on the Fediverse. Originally created for the feminist platform Spinster, Soapbox now powers Truth Social, which has quickly become the largest website running Mastodon online.

Many of the improvements here are thanks to a collaboration between Truth Social, a young man in Poland, and a vibrant Open Source community. These parts have contributed equally to create something amazing.

I am proud to see Soapbox used by leftist anarchists, conservatives, businesses, and fools. People from all different backgrounds use Soapbox, and we build together with ranging viewpoints. The result is the best UI on the Fediverse.