Notices by Ruling Otter (totalslothdeath@poa.st)

"Large Hardon Collider."

Best. Misspelling. Ever.

@sickburnbro However, do remember the division of the feebs they euphemistically call "Community Relations Service", which, IIRC, has been decommissioned. I'm sure they were the first on the scene to explain to her how to speak to the media.

If I'm not mistaken, at least that interference is gone. For now.

@sickburnbro @VidMasterEon I was going to add that, too, that the document itself is not what we honor. It's the principles behind it. Which means changing it to better match those principles should always be an option (but the process should be spelled out, explicitly, which in this case, it is).

There are plenty of subversives who adhere to the 'living constitution' dogma. That the most 'uh-mazing' thing about the constitution is that it can change. First, its not at all amazing, because any document can be amended with the agreement of the relevant parties. Second, amending it is not all what the living-constitution retards mean. Deliberately corrupting the existing language of it to mean something that it does not mean is what they are advocating.

@sickburnbro @VidMasterEon This is derived from the Lysander Spooner quote, "But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist"

I'll say the unpopular thing. That was a retarded comment for him to make. Because it implies that no contract or anything else put in writing is fit to exist if the outcome does not line up with its intent. Everything put in writing is meaningless without moral men to ensure it happens as intended.

@sickburnbro After reading A Midwestern Doctor, I'd refuse being an organ recipient.

https://www. midwesterndoctor. com/p/do-organs-have-a-mind-of-their-own

@BowsacNoodle @retroedgetech Yup. My general POV, now, is no intervention unless I'm dying right tf now and it's preventable. If one part of my body gets separated from the rest and I'm bleeding out, I'm kinda, sorta hoping that they can stanch the bleeding and stitch me back together. And for known ~100% fatality things like rabies, I'll take my chances with Big Voodoo.

I had an intention (not a goal, as that implies some degree of flexibility that you might not meet that goal) to absolutely refuse to ever start on a med that I 'can't ever get off of' (according to them). Average 60yo in the US is on about 8 meds, 4 of them to counter adverse effects if the other 4. I'm on zero and intend on keeping it that way.

There us no such thing as a pharmaceutical deficiency. And that includes vaccines. Read up on how the universally vaccinating against measles has made it demonstrably worse for subsequent generations, for example.

In all cases I know of, natural immunity (including that passed on by the mother) is always superior. So if the mortality is low (definitely the case for measles since we got better sanitation and nutrition...with the latter deteriorating since Ancel spit Keys...but I digress). So there is a significant high bar for safety for nearly all childhood illnesses. At least in places where pooping in the street is frowned upon.

So at 61, all prophylactic vaccines are a hard no for me.

@Sui @ThatCrazyDude @Myshkin @PNS I was a sponsor for an in-law from a South American country and very vividly remember the clause about me being financially responsible for her should she become indigent. Thankfully, my blood relative is still married to her and is gainfully (self-) employed, and she's since become naturalized. I do remember her being a little irate that the naturalization forms she had to sign required she 'renounce' her citizenship of her country of origin, though. And she's barely able to speak or even understand English after 25 years. But at least she's completely inactive politically other than voting, and not mooching off of my taxes.