Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:27:45 JST Bread up, Bro
   yet another horrible supreme court decision I did not know about
   • soberano likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     ☢️ :hacker_s: :hacker_n: :hacker_e: :hacker_e: :hacker_d: :what_a_shame: (nitrodubs@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:43:32 JST ☢️ :hacker_s: :hacker_n: :hacker_e: :hacker_e: :hacker_d: :what_a_shame:

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro This really needs to be relitigated.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:43:32 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • ☢️ :hacker_s: :hacker_n: :hacker_e: :hacker_e: :hacker_d: :what_a_shame:
     @NitroDubs I agree. The problem is that it's hard to get something like that up to the SCOTUS, and have enough meat on it for judges to clearly show the old case was wrongly decided.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:45:47 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Orkin_Awk
     @Orkin_Awk pardoning isn't what you want here.
   • Embed this notice
     Orkin_Awk (orkin_awk@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:45:48 JST Orkin_Awk

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro Trump won't pardon him. He isn't jewish
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:56:59 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • RichardKuklinskisHeavyHeadTrip
     @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare You can see behaviors in England - which was free of jews for hundreds of years - that are problematic.
     
     They certainly are no help and often are instigators of problems, but a lot of their bad ideas were swallowed whole by whites because they really believed what they were selling.
   • Embed this notice
     RichardKuklinskisHeavyHeadTrip (richardkuklinskisicyglare@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:57:00 JST RichardKuklinskisHeavyHeadTrip

     in reply to
     Surprised the jews weren't directly behind the decision to remove our right to retrieve stolen property using force 😏 seems to be naive bleeding heart White liberals and a token negro. Cheek turners and do gooders don't think lethal force should be used for anything. Being excessively civilized and domesticated through years of removing any Whites who have any capacity for violence over the centuries has created the incredibly cucked situation in the West. Australia has a better shot at righting itself than the UK does because the UK sent all their real men with balls to Australia because they weren't faggy enough for the type of "polite society" they were trying to have. Now they're invaded and conquered with no sign of retvrning
   • Embed this notice
     Professor Groyper (professor_groyper@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:58:03 JST Professor Groyper

     in reply to

     • Orkin_Awk
     @Orkin_Awk @sickburnbro pardoning implies that he did something wrong
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:58:03 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • Professor Groyper
     • Orkin_Awk
     @Professor_Groyper @Orkin_Awk you want what Macaky did - get the courts to invalidate it, so that no-one ever needs to be pardoned for breaking a bad law.
   • Embed this notice
     Orkin_Awk (orkin_awk@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 01:58:04 JST Orkin_Awk

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro What am I missing from the case?
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 02:03:35 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • RichardKuklinskisHeavyHeadTrip
     @RichardKuklinskisIcyGlare being a con-man is not unique to jews; though their history has probably made them wildly more disposed to it.
     
     The rules for con-men is that you always want to sell something people want to buy, and just give them an excuse to buy it.
   • Embed this notice
     RichardKuklinskisHeavyHeadTrip (richardkuklinskisicyglare@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 02:03:36 JST RichardKuklinskisHeavyHeadTrip

     in reply to
     Like Holohoax and all the variations of "plan trusting and faith having" they used to manipulate White people for centuries 😏
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 08:16:22 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • VidMasterEon
     @VidMasterEon that hurts.
     
     the founding fathers for their part knew it was "only for a moral people"
   • Embed this notice
     VidMasterEon (vidmastereon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 08:16:23 JST VidMasterEon

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 08:35:54 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • VidMasterEon
     • Ruling Otter
     @totalslothdeath @VidMasterEon I do think things like that are a good antidote to people that make a king out of a document; and as we've seen there are plenty of them.
     
     They carp about how if we just followed muh constitution everything would be fine; but the key is that sometimes you can't ask for people to do such a thing - because evil people will just ignore you
   • Embed this notice
     Ruling Otter (totalslothdeath@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 08:35:55 JST Ruling Otter

     in reply to

     • VidMasterEon

     @sickburnbro @VidMasterEon This is derived from the Lysander Spooner quote, "But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist"

     I'll say the unpopular thing. That was a retarded comment for him to make. Because it implies that no contract or anything else put in writing is fit to exist if the outcome does not line up with its intent. Everything put in writing is meaningless without moral men to ensure it happens as intended.

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 09:07:03 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • VidMasterEon
     • Ruling Otter
     @totalslothdeath @VidMasterEon I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women%2... was allowed because 1) they wanted to overturn it but also 2) had good legal justification for doing it and 3) they had good reason to accept the case to begin with ( Mississippi saying they had sound scientific evidence for their ban )
     
     the problem with Tennessee v. Garner is the conception of it being a seizure relies on the 4th amd makes it tricker to dislodge
   • Embed this notice
     Ruling Otter (totalslothdeath@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 09:07:04 JST Ruling Otter

     in reply to

     • VidMasterEon
     • Ruling Otter
     @sickburnbro @VidMasterEon Oh, and I just reread the OP and Kauffman has no idea what he's talking about. I understand it may be a high bar, but SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade, recent by the same standard. Also, Obergefel may get the axe, too, which is much more recent. And the Chevron standard was adopted right around the same time as TN vs. Garner, yet that is now deep sixed. WTF does recency have to do with it?
   • Embed this notice
     Ruling Otter (totalslothdeath@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 22-Aug-2025 09:07:05 JST Ruling Otter

     in reply to

     • VidMasterEon

     @sickburnbro @VidMasterEon I was going to add that, too, that the document itself is not what we honor. It's the principles behind it. Which means changing it to better match those principles should always be an option (but the process should be spelled out, explicitly, which in this case, it is).

     There are plenty of subversives who adhere to the 'living constitution' dogma. That the most 'uh-mazing' thing about the constitution is that it can change. First, its not at all amazing, because any document can be amended with the agreement of the relevant parties. Second, amending it is not all what the living-constitution retards mean. Deliberately corrupting the existing language of it to mean something that it does not mean is what they are advocating.