Notices by James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)
-
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 26-Apr-2025 09:19:06 JST 
James_Dixon
@NoDoxGregBrady @Momther @mischievoustomato > Most modern men will cave right here.
Save for the fact that she probably can't have kids, she actually sounds pretty good. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Apr-2025 23:35:25 JST
James_Dixon
I asked @NoDoxGregBrady why he'd switched doctors, and he only mumbled something about "nurse" as he turned away. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 19:57:03 JST
James_Dixon
@zero @Humpleupagus > yeah. try and walk around a public school.
I used to do exactly that. That was 40 years ago though.
> or go behind the counter at the post office.
If no one is at the post office and all the doors are unlocked are you breaking the law to walk around looking for someone? -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 09:36:33 JST
James_Dixon
@Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta > The pardon power is a plenary power. It can be exercised whether the pardoned party is guilty or innocent, and therefore speaks to neither.
That wasn't what I asked.
> You seriously can't be this dumb. You well know guilty parties are regularly pardoned.
Again not what I asked.
But don't bother answering, because I won't see it. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 09:32:24 JST
James_Dixon
@Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta > That's absolutely false.
Then why were they pardoned?
We all know why: Because they didn't actually break the law. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 08:13:51 JST
James_Dixon
@Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta > Sure. Just walk into a federal judges chambers or the oval office.
Unless someone with authority says you can't you're allowed to. All public buildings are open to the public as the default.
No one even tried to tell them they weren't permitted to be there, so they were. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 07:42:12 JST
James_Dixon
@Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta > Those arrested trespassed on federal property.
You can't trespass on property that belongs to you. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 02:03:23 JST
James_Dixon
@Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Humpleupagus > The people arrested performed illegal acts.
Petitioning the government for the address of grievances is not an illegal act. The people own the government buildings. Being in them is not trespassing. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Apr-2025 05:51:54 JST
James_Dixon
@TrevorGoodchild @capt_whitebeard @IAMAL_PHARIUS > Being right too early is indistinguishable from being wrong, and you go broke either way
For shorting, this is true. Without leverage you're maximum upside on a short is 100%. Your potential downside is unlimited.
For long positions, as long as you're using money you can afford to lose that's not really the case. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 19:31:24 JST
James_Dixon
@Charles_in_Charge @TrevorGoodchild @KarlDahl @PraxisOfEvil @deprecated_ii > As someone with no training in economics, "line must always go up" has the feeling of a sweaty, jittery junkie casting about for his next fix.
Growth forever and at all costs is the philosophy of a cancer cell, not of a healthy economy. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Feb-2025 03:58:37 JST
James_Dixon
@Escoffier @Snidely_Whiplash @jesuspilled > I'm not anti-Church i'm anti modern churches that i believe have been corrupted and have failed.
And I agree. Many have. But not all, and you want to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
We also disagree about the nature and degree of what they still have right. And since we're talking the sacraments Christ himself commanded that renders your position untenable for me. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Feb-2025 03:58:37 JST
James_Dixon
@Escoffier @Snidely_Whiplash @jesuspilled > I did not realize you had a laminated "always right" card.
If I didn't think I was right I wouldn't argue my position.
But in this case the words of Christ himself say I am.
> Seems to me that your arguments work better if you just ignore and elide over my arguments, or don't understand them.
Nope. I understand your arguments. But you've never once explained to me how you're going to keep Christ's commandment to perform the sacrament he himself instituted just before his death without a church to do so.
And you don't seem to understand that a house church of any size is still a church, and as such should keep his commandments, most especially that one.
You seem to think it's simply a meal shared by fellow Christians, and it's not. A meal is just a meal. The sacrament is is the body and blood of Christ. That's what you don't seem to get.
> Not sure which it may be but its not terribly compelling. When you suggested i check out a Lutheran Church, if we had been in the same room you would have been struck for that statement. It was obnoxious.
Come by anytime. I make no secret of where I live. But the fact that you would resort to violence over the disagreement merely shows that you don't understand its nature. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Feb-2025 03:58:11 JST
James_Dixon
@Escoffier @Snidely_Whiplash @jesuspilled > So from an early Church point of view (during the Apostles lifetime) they has what they called the Agape feast which seemed to be a recreation of the Lord's support with actual food and liturgical elements
The modern service is ceremonial in that it recognizes that Christ said that it was actually his body an blood that were being consumed, so proper care of the items is required. Obviously he was there in person to correct any problems at the last supper.
> and then a second gathering which was more casual where they would express their gifts and edify one another.
That's an after service meal, which was still fairly common when I was a child. I don't know how common it is now. Most churches I've been to still serve coffee/tea/snacks after the service though.
> and what error was being fixed by this mashup?
Why does doing things in a more ceremonial, safer (for the elements used in the service), and more convenient way have to be fixing an error? -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Feb-2025 03:58:11 JST
James_Dixon
@Snidely_Whiplash @Escoffier @jesuspilled > The purpose of Mass is to worship God in Spirit and Truth.
The only thing I know for certain about Communion is that Christ commanded us to do it.
"And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me."
As far as I can tell this was intended as a direct commandment to all of his followers for all time, at least until his return.
I consider it extremely unwise to disobey one of his direct commandments. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Feb-2025 03:58:10 JST
James_Dixon
@Escoffier @Snidely_Whiplash @jesuspilled > I believe the Apostles had a purpose for both gatherings and I think we managed to cobble together the dumbest possible version or perhaps the most pointless version.
There is nothing pointless about the body and blood of Christ. That's the specific thing he commanded us to do.
> The Agape feast was how they did communion not just wine and crackers
Again, the wine and bread are the body and blood of Christ. That's what the commandment is about. Not the meal itself. He didn't say "eat a meal to in remembrance of me". He said "For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come."
That's what the Communion service is. Keeping that specific commandment. We don't know for certain why it's necessary for us to do so (though I can hazard a few guesses), but we know it is because otherwise he would not have commanded it.
Christian fellowship is always a good thing, and the sharing of a meal is a perfectly acceptable part of that. But it's not a Mass. It's not Communion. They're completely separate things. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Feb-2025 03:58:09 JST
James_Dixon
@Escoffier @Snidely_Whiplash @jesuspilled > Well as that is exactly my position, yes.
And to the degree that you argue the Communion service (Eucharist, Mass, whatever you want to call it) is one of those things, you're wrong.
It really is that simple. You can confess your sins directly to God. You can be married in the eyes of God without a church. Without a church you don't need confirmation or ordination. And arguably even baptism doesn't need the church since it the baptism of the Holy Spirit that matters, though that's not something I'd like to test.
But Communion cannot be replaced outside the Church. It requires a stand in for Christ to consecrate the bread and wine as he did for his disciples. And that is something that not just anyone can do. It requires a community of Christians to choose someone worthy to do so and ask God's blessing on his position, and that community is by definition a church and part of the Church.
Fortunately, God is not limited by space and time, so a virtual church will do for receiving Communion. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Feb-2025 03:58:09 JST
James_Dixon
@Escoffier @Snidely_Whiplash @jesuspilled > And yet that is how they did it
Is it? I wasn't there. Neither were you.
The Latin Mass goes back at least to the 300's. Did they really get it all wrong in less than 300 years?
Even Wikipedia, which can hardly be considered Christian friendly, notes that " Hugh Somerville-Knapman, O.S.B., says that they should be separate rites, as the Mass promulgated at the Council of Trent was already the pre-existing liturgy of the Diocese of Rome and has direct continuity with the Mass practiced by the apostles"
You can complain about a lot of things with the modern Church, but if you believe the words of Christ, the Communion service is not one of them. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Feb-2025 03:58:08 JST
James_Dixon
@Escoffier @Snidely_Whiplash @jesuspilled > At this point u have to wonder if we have a language in common?
Not when it comes to the Church, no. Most of what I'm saying is lost on you. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Feb-2025 03:58:07 JST
James_Dixon
@Escoffier @Snidely_Whiplash @jesuspilled > Oddly enough I feel the exact same way about you
I know. You're wrong about that too, but there's no point in arguing that matter. Whether you think I understand your position or not isn't important. -
Embed this notice
James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 17-Feb-2025 15:20:40 JST
James_Dixon
@Escoffier @jesuspilled The Latin version with English translation of the Extraordinary Form of the Traditional Latin Mass:
https://www.extraordinaryform.org/ExtraordinaryFormTex...
Compare and contrast to the Anglican English Communion from the 1928 Prayer Book:
http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bcp/1928/HC.htm
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the