Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Kalogerosstilitis2RvngotJunta (kalogerosstilitis2revengeofthejunta@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 00:01:14 JST Kalogerosstilitis2RvngotJunta

   • ?? Humpleupagus ??
   Yeah...
   
   RT: https://eveningzoo.club/objects/80c521a3-6c6a-4045-9b97-2e09ebcd75a7
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 00:01:14 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to
     I don't think you can read. I never said the manner in which they were detained was appropriate or even legal. I said that speech was not the basis of the detention. That's just a fact. That you're a low IQ nigger monkey is your problem
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 00:17:09 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • Based Stable Lunatic
     And they were tried by a jury and convicted. The raid looks justified.
   • Embed this notice
     Based Stable Lunatic (basedlunatic@annihilation.social)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 00:17:10 JST Based Stable Lunatic

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     @Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta I remember when they went after these guys because of Russia derangement syndrome.
     Screenshot_20250417_171144_Samsung Internet.jpg
   • Embed this notice
     Hotep 悪い? (bad_banner@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 00:22:49 JST Hotep 悪い?

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Based Stable Lunatic
     @Humpleupagus @BasedLunatic @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta The Uhuru movement (and specifically African People's Socialist Party that Omali leads) are retarded but they're not Russian backed.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 00:22:49 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • Hotep 悪い?
     • Based Stable Lunatic
     I don't know what evidence was presented, but the jury thought that was the case, and I assume that the conviction was based on acts, not speech. I don't have much more to add, except it doesn't facial establish a free speech issue. I just don't know.
   • Embed this notice
     Based Stable Lunatic (basedlunatic@annihilation.social)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 00:28:57 JST Based Stable Lunatic

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     @Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Bad_Banner it wasn't justified. The were aquited for the main charge as acting as agents of foreign government but since the judge was vague in explaining to jury they were guilty of conspiring with Russia. How can you be guilty of conspiring with Russia without being a agent for foreign government? By that metric 70% of fediversee is guilty
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 00:28:57 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • Based Stable Lunatic
     Like I said, I don't know the facts. And yes, you will have political prosecutions. That's true in every regime. But we're taking about freedom generally, and as to the average person, the US is far more protective of speech than most, if not all, EU countries.
   • Embed this notice
     Based Stable Lunatic (basedlunatic@annihilation.social)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 00:36:35 JST Based Stable Lunatic

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     @Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta it's better than all European countries combined, the US. But they were trying to weaken first ammendment protections with this case. The whole Russia conflict served as a opportunity. That's why this case was so important.
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 02:03:23 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Humpleupagus > The people arrested performed illegal acts.
     
     
     
     Petitioning the government for the address of grievances is not an illegal act. The people own the government buildings. Being in them is not trespassing.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 02:03:23 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • James_Dixon
     Those arrested trespassed on federal property. Now you may think the treatment is harsh, and I agree. But they did violate the law via non-speech / non-petitioning activity. To deny that is just retarded.
     
     What you fail to understand is this...
     
     You cannot outlaw the burning of a flag, but you can outlaw the burning of objects of certain sizes in public or without a permit. Now if such a law exists and you burn an American flag during a protest, you can be arrested for violating that law. That the burning had a speech element does not entail it wasn't the burning of an object in violation of law. To put it another way, the law doesn't care if you burned a flag or a cardboard box and it doesn't look into why you did it. Burning is illegal.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 07:42:11 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • James_Dixon
     Sure. Just walk into a federal judges chambers or the oval office.
     
     > I am paying for this microphone.
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 07:42:12 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     @Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta > Those arrested trespassed on federal property.
     
     You can't trespass on property that belongs to you.
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 08:13:51 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     @Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta > Sure. Just walk into a federal judges chambers or the oval office.
     
     
     Unless someone with authority says you can't you're allowed to. All public buildings are open to the public as the default.
     
     No one even tried to tell them they weren't permitted to be there, so they were.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 08:13:51 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • James_Dixon
     That's absolutely false.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 08:18:16 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • DeezMistaReez :verified:
     • James_Dixon
     > Yup. This guy's retarded.
   • Embed this notice
     DeezMistaReez :verified: (deezmistareez@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 08:18:17 JST DeezMistaReez :verified:

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • James_Dixon
     Shhh let him 😏
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 09:32:23 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • James_Dixon
     The pardon power is a plenary power. It can be exercised whether the pardoned party is guilty or innocent, and therefore speaks to neither.
     
     You seriously can't be this dumb. You well know guilty parties are regularly pardoned.
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 09:32:24 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     @Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta > That's absolutely false.
     
     Then why were they pardoned?
     
     We all know why: Because they didn't actually break the law.
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 09:36:33 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     @Humpleupagus @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta > The pardon power is a plenary power. It can be exercised whether the pardoned party is guilty or innocent, and therefore speaks to neither.
     
     That wasn't what I asked.
     
     > You seriously can't be this dumb. You well know guilty parties are regularly pardoned.
     
     Again not what I asked.
     
     But don't bother answering, because I won't see it.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 09:36:33 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • James_Dixon
     You didn't ask anything actually. Do you even know what a question is or how to ask one. Fucking kill yourself, faggot.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 09:41:56 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • James_Dixon
     • Witch Hunter Siegfried
     Autism on the timeline. Many such cases.
   • Embed this notice
     Witch Hunter Siegfried (witch_hunter_siegfried@clew.lol)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 09:41:57 JST Witch Hunter Siegfried

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • James_Dixon
     Humph’s a lawyer, so OFC you’re getting the legal autism anwser