@kevingranade@benpate@davidgerard@rakoo@jdp23@scottjenson@thisismissem And let people see you punching the Nazis, over and over again. Nothing is more welcoming to ordinary people than seeing Nazis get punched. Nazis need to know they're going to get punched for the rest of us to feel safe.
A shadow fell over the city and the sky turned dark. "Gryphons!" yelled a knight. Everyone looked up to see dozens of gryphons circling overhead. "It's a whole #flock!" yelled one. "It's called a 'flight'!" yelled another. "I'm pretty sure the correct term is 'wing'," said a third. "You're all wrong," said a fourth. "Everyone knows they're called a 'pride'." "Wasn't 'pride' last month?" said yet another, who hadn't been paying attention. "Look out!" yelled the Captain. "Here they come!" #wss366
@dillyd I've filled found rum bottles with sea glass and chaney (pieces of broken china found in the surf) to make gifts for friends to remind them of our trips to the islands.
@dalias@X00001 As an author, that distinction is something I struggle with. I go to extraordinary lengths to avoid AI. And when I submit a manuscript, I certify that my manuscript was created without AI. But, no matter how I struggle to avoid it, its creeping in under everything I do.
@dalias@X00001 I'm talking about the names of streets, where the parks and major buildings are, the surrounding topography and landmarks, etc. When I took Remote Sensing back in the day, an orthomap (an orthogonally corrected airphoto with map elements overlaid) was hundreds of dollars for a single quad. It's an unbelievable miracle that you can now trivially easily inspect orthomaps for the whole earth. But it has embedded AI. So my question still stands: Does that count as using AI?
@X00001 The problem is that it's getting harder and harder to avoid AI because it's getting shoehorned into everything, everywhere. If you use Google Maps to research a setting, you used AI. Does that count? https://stevendbrewer.com/sloppy-writing/
An infuriating fluff piece about Anthropic using an LLM to run a vending machine at the WSJ (via @jacobsberg.bsky.social). The journalist uncritically accepted statements from the Anthropic flack like, "They maybe don't have the most sophisticated understanding…" No, no, no! LLMs don't "understand" anything. Pretending as though they do should be recognized as a category error with these systems. https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-claude-ai-vending-machine-agent-b7e84e34?st=V2XjZM&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
@jonny Although tenure-system faculty don't have to fear being fired, they live in constant fear of the loss of funding. Because their entire enterprise is dependent on soft money, even a small gap in funding results in professional death — at least in the life sciences. If you lose your funding, you lose all your staff and can't purchase supplies to continue your research. And probably can't come back from that. This has contributed to a head-down conservative approach to any kind of activism.
Author of #LGBTQIA+ #ScienceFiction and #Fantasy #Books. Teacher of scientific writing. Lover of natural history. Faculty at UMass Amherst. Presiding Officer of the Faculty Senate. SFWA Secretary. Straw Dog Writers' Guild. Ekskabeinto. #WesternMass カワウソになりたい (he/him)