@bot@korgster@anemone@sun@zonk@lunarised I put a stop to these things by using free software (doesn't contain NSA backdoors unlike proprietary software), including gpg, gnuTLS, tor, i2p and clearnet to own the NSA.
They don't care about proprietary modules that don't respect the users freedom and don't enforce their license against those, but when it comes to free software modules, that are under a free software license that does a better job defending the users freedom, suddenly they're ready to enforce their license?
No matter what some documentation says, MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") can only legally mean any version of the GNU General Public License, as per the GPLv2; Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation.
Too bad not actually reading the GPLv2 seems very common.
For GPLv2-only, you *must* write; MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2-only"). For GPLv2-or-later, you *must* write; MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2-or-later").
Of course the licensing macro won't accept either?
@sally@kaia Generally you don't run GNU shred unless you have singled out files that need to be deleted and not recovered and thus accidental deletion with it doesn't really happen.
@sally Probably thousands to tens of thousands of times.
The darknet is just sites not indexed by any search engine and the sickos that collect pizza usually always want more and are also incredibly stupid (a prerequisite really) thus go on clearnet sites to exchange it.
There was one popular .onion service in the past, but the host was an idiot (see the pattern) and he was arrested.
Of course the feds opted to keep hosting the site as a sting, even going so far to personally post pizza (the whole idea was that the feds would never do the immoral act of posting pizza and thus not post it, thus it was a way to know that the site wasn't being fed run, but it turns out the feds have the biggest, most curated collection and posted two photos?).
@ShtPoastAnon >it's people doing cover for obviously bad actors I use tor by default to do whatever and I must be a bad actor.
Competent bad actors don't use tor - they use their own better networks of compromised IoStings devices and windows computers, which don't have haram IPs.
A small percentage of tor's userspace is incompetent bad actors that are easily detected.
>Just don't use the internet because tor isn't even fast. It's faster than dial-up, so it's perfectly usable.
>the exit nodes are well monitored so unless you run your own, the privacy argument is already out the window. Due to tor's design, the exit node does not know who sent the packet and if you use TLS, the exit node doesn't know what's in the packet.
The glowers may run a few exit nodes (malicious nodes that carry out attacks are detected and removed from the network) and some nodes may have their connection monitored, but really that is true of any connection that is routed via the USA.
If you were to run your own exit and exclusively use that without a serious amount of other people using it, you would have no privacy, as it would be obvious as to who the connections were coming from.
tor also supports .onion services, which do not use exit nodes.
@Francisco >more of an infringement of the rights of others, rather than freedom. Please do explain.
It is not right to say that; "no, you cannot modify and/or share that written work" - that is rather wrong and is a restriction.
All the creative works I publish are under a free license that respects the 4 freedoms.
>deceptive redefinition of the word "Freedom" It is deceptive to claim that government enforced restrictions on freedom (copyright) is what freedom is.
@bot@korgster@anemone@sun@zonk@lunarised >Writing about how basic human decency and human rights are being brazenly violated by the NSA's crimes against humanity. >Suddenly you think about depraved degeneracy like cheese pizza and proprietary drugs. Really makes you think.
Even if you are not schizophrenic, you don't buy illegal drugs off the internet and try not to do anything else immoral, there is still a chance you will be selected for prosecution based off the NSA's spying records.
The "you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" argument is pain wrong, as you have everything to fear even if you are so dull and boring that you have nothing to hide.
The NSA spies of every citizen of the USA as well as the world and shoves all spying records on warehouses and warehouses of HDDs.
If you are incredibly dull and boring, maybe a NSA employee will never pull up your spying records, but those who aren't are likely to have their spying records pulled up at least once.