@p You're just demonstrating here (and counter to your prior post on this topic) and "appointment" has two meanings.

That was my whole point in this thread.

1. On the one hand, King Charles can "appoint" (choose) his own driver or any office in his United Kingdom.

2. On the other hand, in the Canadian political context, the Monarch can "appoint" (approve) someone else's choice/recommendation - including that of the Prime Minister (selected by the people).

Your conflation of the two is worrying, or assuming your audience would conflate the two is even more worrying.

But if you want to fuel that narrative of USA is freer than Canada, there are certainly better ways.

I just don't want you - or any other non-Canadian / non-Commonwealth citizen to misunderstand and/or misrepresent how Commonwealth governments work.

And yes, for the record, I believe you do understand how they work, but I also believe you deceptively misdescribed our parliamentary democracies with your choice of words and references. Probably for humour and probably because you didn't think I would push back.

Well I did.


@0 @11112011 @DiamondMind @DigitalCheese @Doll @Forestofenchantment @Frank @Hoss @NonPlayableClown @Sui @Terry @dcc @dick @ins0mniak @j @jeffcliff @pernia @pwm @rlier23 @syzygy @thatguyoverthere @thebitchisback @threat