@LukeAlmighty "touching without consent" leading to abuse is almost as ridiculous, because touching a shoulder to let a woman know you're trying to do something behind them and not to hit you is also "touching without consent"
@sickburnbro@LukeAlmighty this entire thing is stupid from top-to-bottom, shit like "femicide" literally only exist in women's fantasies. they're spending so long thinking about how nice it would be to leverage the social status of "special victim who deserves everything" that they forgot the part where you have to actually be believable to manipulate others into doing what you want
@sickburnbro@LukeAlmighty i guess the point i want to drive home here is: this is the woman version of thuggish violence.
that high you feel when you threaten to hurt someone to get what you want? that's the same high women feel when they lie about victimhood for attention. it's the same rush; the sensation of doing something you know is wrong and getting away with it. they're both equally caustic towards a stable society and need to be treated identically
or to stop beating around the bush and say what i'm thinking, this is the sort of thing that should get your ass beat until you learn to stop doing it
@All_bonesJones@LukeAlmighty yeah. I think this is why that feminization article has hit quite the nerve - because it's obvious that women have been running absolutely wild and "believe all women" should have been recognized as a sign that the society was in septic shock.
@sickburnbro@All_bonesJones@LukeAlmighty I've had exes way back in the past that had been part of women's empowerment groups. I got bits of what went on from them and it was all very well organized. From speakers at their groups, printed literature, retreats. And they all had rehearsed phrases and behaviours you could immediately pick out and see was trained into them. I'm sure they had drills of some kind in those meetings.
It's no different really than the antifa horseshit we're seeing today. All funded by the same sources over decades.
@LawrenceGerald@sickburnbro the whole point of guns is to be an equalizer. why do you depend on someone to protect you? you have the tools, suppose it's better to just be useless on purpose? I'm not a misandrist, this is, in fact, coming from a place of hate for women pretending to be victims of their own weakness when that has been fixed.
@f0x@sickburnbro I'm not sure your grasp on traditional sex roles is the same as mine. The fact of the matter is that women are physically helpless against men who mean them harm. We have a lot of guns in circulation and that hasn't equalized anything because it's a fact of life. Many of the things feminists complain about are real, not made-up, but their solutions to them are always cancer. The solution is to accept it and stay the fuck home the way women have done for the entirety of human history.
@f0x@sickburnbro dude, fuck that. women didn't need guns to exist in the before times because their husbands, fathers, and brothers had guns. the wretched obsession with bad-ass bikini-wearing whores posing with guns is cancer.
@sickburnbro "approaching w/o consent" through rape is what happens when women aren't protected and kept home for our own good. we really don't have any way to protect ourselves and must rely on men to do it.
some of us old fucks remember when it actually *wasn't* ok for a strange man to approach a woman he didn't know in public. this was before my time, but I came from old-fashioned people.
look, I know that world is gone with the wind and wammans insisted we wanted to be free, but it was a terrible idea. there was a hefty fuckin' fee. we need to be re-imprisoned for our own safety and well-being, not to mention that of the menfolks and the children.
@f0x@LawrenceGerald@sickburnbro my guess (since I can't talk to them directly) is they get off the power differential. they've blown it up in their minds to the point they think it's socially mandatory just because it's been a reality of life in the more brutal ages that humans had to adapt to in the past.
but that doesn't at all mean it was a universal or even that common outside of times of war (which are unfortunately overrepresented in our behavioral repertoire because a LOT of population shifts happen around such events). and in times of peace and law and order, a dominance/submission fetish is not that harmful so it doesn't seem to get selected against
basically the theory (just-so story) here is that women who would submit to their captors rather than rebel had a higher chance of surviving.
@bajax@LawrenceGerald@sickburnbro Just because she, or her friend(s), or what she's read has told her that women are bad at shooting in self defense scenarios does not mean they should give up practicing for self defense scenarios, it means they suck and need to practice for self defense scenarios. How is this difficult to understand?
@RetardStrength@LukeAlmighty@sickburnbro i'm not being a nitpicker i'm pointing out you have internalized a fake term and accepted its implications, and it affects your arguments and thought process
this is a bad thing to do unless your goal is to implicitly argue for this style of retarded bullshit
Of course there are different kinds of homicides, like me murdering you because I'm annoyed by your nitpicking is different from murdering you for money, or killing a woman for being a nagging bitch, or sexual murder... and so on.
@RetardStrength@LukeAlmighty@sickburnbro no, that's homicide inventing a fictional category of homicide to feel extra-special super-duper victimized is completely fake. it's not a real thing and it does not happen.