Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
I have never seen the media so divided on Israel as it is right now. The usual shabbos culprits like Fox News are calling it a "pre-emptive strike", but there's a multitude of headlines using the phrase "unprovoked attack", which is very far removed from the usual apologetic language these outlets use when they sweep up for Israel.
-
Embed this notice
@dickflatteningenthusiast It only makes no sense to you if you think that this has anything to do with Israel.
Obama signed the deal with Iran, Israel/Egypt/SA hated the deal. Israel said that Iran's never getting a nuke, Egypt and Saudi Arabia agreed (for domestic reasons, somewhat less vocally).
US pumps Israel. Russia pumps, depending on who it's useful to pump, Iran, Syria, or Turkey, playing the three off each other.
Neolibs *hate* Russia. Letting Iran become the regional hegemon fucks up Russia's strategy. Fox is neolibs. Happy Pride Month.
cannot_rescue_you--cops_are_gay_bumblebees.png
-
Embed this notice
@p Russia is hated by jews because Russia used to have a lot of jews. The way it works is jews are allowed into a country, abuse the locals, so the authorities try to control the jews. Eventually someone gets fed up and the jews are driven out. In Russia's case they had a really bad jew problem due to conquering areas with too many jews. So when it came to a head the jews were big mad, fled to the US and regrouped, and funded communism to get revenge. Which worked pretty well until an even bigger murderer, Stalin, took over and started purging them.
Eventually the US jews figured this out, switched sides, and created conservativism and beat the USSR through economic warfare and propaganda, at which point the jew oligarchs looted the corpse.
Putin is hated because he, with jews so thin on the ground, for the first time in almost a century managed to create a non-jewed government.
The real solution is to wipe out the jews everywhere.
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread
> used to
Still does, last I heard.
> fled to the US and regrouped, and funded communism to get revenge.
Well, this is interesting but contradicts some of Rockefeller's remarks. I think, you know, if you treat it like a communism-vs.-whatever problem rather than "top-down, planned, orderly societies appeal to people that believe they can control the top" problem, you miss that. Mussolini was already on the "USSR isn't real socialism" meme, in those exact words (though it was in Italian): he said it was better described as "Russian state capitalism". That's the essence of communist societies: they are run top-down, like a business that you can't resign from, and it's the same with any totalitarian system. It appeals to them for really obvious reasons. The end goal is control. A magical being comes down from the sky or out of a bottle you've rubbed and tells you that you have been given absolute authority over a country, and you don't ask "Are they communist or capitalist?" any more than you would care about the color scheme of the flag or any of the other branding. It's just control.
"There will soon come an armed contest between capital and labor. They will oppose each other, not with words and arguments, but with shot and shell, gun-powder and cannon. The better classes are tired of the insane howling of the lower strata and they mean to stop them." :wtsherman:
> Putin is hated because
You should read Kissinger's book.
Anyway, Putin's corrupt as hell and has still managed to make the most stable government they've had in a while. I mean, look at Chechnya: nobody managed to handle that, he managed it. He's also kept up the Soviet strategy in the Middle East and continues to undermine the petrodollar. And he did all of the things he did while counter-signaling all of the key facets of the neolib agenda, and that's one of the main issues: the propaganda is central, it's been the core facet of the entire strategy for a hundred years. Denying the propaganda with a large enough microphone is reason enough for the propaganda to target him; look at Khaddafi, look at Ron Paul, the press is unkind to people that don't respect the press (or the CIA :nixonmad:). But they can't paint Putin as a backwoods idiot, so they have to make him Hitler.
-
Embed this notice
@Simpadoo @judgedread
> Communism is not the same as fascism: the communist’s untenable position
You're talking philosophy, I'm talking practical terms. If your actual philosophy is Malthusian nihilism, then the ideology for your control over society is just a matter of branding: it doesn't make a difference what people have been sold on as long as they are sold.
> They may both be autocratic but fascism still allows for private business and the state is only involved to ensure it is working for the good of the faction.
Hitler's micromanaged paperwork economy disagrees.
> Fascism would last forever if outside powers would not interfere with internal politics.
Any ideology can make this claim.
-
Embed this notice
@p @judgedread Communism is not the same as fascism: the communist’s untenable position is that everything comes from the material, which is why it’s forbidden to be a communist and a catholic (Bergoglio not withstanding).
They may both be autocratic but fascism still allows for private business and the state is only involved to ensure it is working for the good of the faction. Communism is financial full retard and has no efficiencies that can sustain it.
Fascism would last forever if outside powers would not interfere with internal politics.
-
Embed this notice
@p The proof that Hitler's economy, at least prewar, was not micromanaged is that it was prosperous.
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread It had as much red tape as before.
vampire_economy.pdf
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread
> Rockefeller wanted an Aryan eugenics based society.
Rockefeller wanted what Rothschild wanted, he just wanted it for himself, and he got it; the social goals were secondary. In terms of society, he wanted and got a society controlled by the banks. You can see his remarks about how dumb Stalin was when he was setting up the UN, the World Bank, the IMF, etc.
> Instead we have limitless nigger rights and niggers.
You confuse the goal with the tactics. You're worried about the Civil Rights Act and not about the IMF, because the tactics worked.
-
Embed this notice
@p Rockefeller wanted an Aryan eugenics based society.
If he and his faction had power we'd have that.
Instead we have limitless nigger rights and niggers.
So the Alex Jones blame the WASPs theory is weak.
The 'jews in control' theory explains it all.
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread
> it's not enough to grind them to a halt.
It's a gatekeeping mechanism, just like Rockefeller and Carnegie and Rothschild and every one of these dicks throughout history wanted, because it doesn't halt businesses inside the gate (and provides unlimited white-collar wage-slavery) but it does keep upstarts from getting anywhere.
-
Embed this notice
@p Germans have a lot of bureaucracy, but in any system other than communism it's not enough to grind them to a halt.
-
Embed this notice
@p I'm worried about the extinction of the White race.
You favor it because if it ends you get deported.
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread
> I'm worried about the extinction of the White race.
I don't think it's going to happen, but if you are, then I recommend lying to some Catholic girls about your intention to pull out, or going full-Genghis if you think it's really that dire.
> You favor it because if it ends you get deported.
Every ideology mentioned so far would have me shot for one reason or another, but ideology is downstream from power. "What ideology is popular enough to control this population?" is the question psychopaths care about, because they care about acquiring power. They do not care about communism, capitalism, the white race, any of it, and all of the ideological bickering completely fails to account for that kind of person being exactly the kind of person that gets his hands on the lever, and while that kind of person exists, the person that is willing to fly any flag that gets him where he wants to go, ideologies that include building a population-level lever are misguided. The bad news is that that amoral psychopaths will always exist, and unless you succeed in dumbing down the population or curing psychopathy, you will continue having a problem with the really damaging intersection of amoral psychopathy and high intelligence. Welcome to the only game that has mattered since Lee DeForest set up shop: you're in it whether you want it or not.
-
Embed this notice
@Simpadoo @judgedread
> Philosophy eventually translates into reality.
If a man is both honest and thoughtful, sure. But you confuse the professed ideology of someone that only cares about power with actual philosophy.
> The Church saw early on and condemned it for that reason.
It is probably worth noting that any organization is likely to condemn a thing that promises to end its grip on whatever power it has.
But if we take it at face value, the same organization condemned the printing press. Their endorsement isn't particularly meaningful from my perspective.
> To reduce it to a mere changing of shirts because they may both be authoritarian is disingenuous at best.
I don't have a lot of patience for being called a liar today.
-
Embed this notice
@p @judgedread Philosophy eventually translates into reality. It’s just that a lot of it doesn’t have a good foundation and the only reason China avoided it is because they embraced national socialism (they don’t call it that but that’s what it is).
Philosophy tells you that ignoring human nature and the things that aren’t material is a surefire way to fail and to cause much harm to all elements of the body politic. The Church saw early on and condemned it for that reason.
Because they go against nature, totalitarian is the only way for a communist regime to go. In contrast, fascist regimes are immensely popular. One is not the same as the other. To reduce it to a mere changing of shirts because they may both be authoritarian is disingenuous at best.
All fascists had to be forcibly defeated by military force but communism has the distinction of historical, self-caused failure so yes, anybody can make the claim but you can’t just ignore this reality but communists do suck. What was the last commie regime that the UN said “OK, that’s enough buddy, you’re too oppressive so we will have to change your regime”?Yet they did this for South Africa, Rhodesia, Germany, Japan, etc. Spain had a fascist regime and only ended when their cuck king decided to end it. Only people bitching about it were the nun-raping communists but, like in most countries, they usually owned the media and so the idiot Spanish king pulled down his shorts and just let it happen.
Hitler’s policies were successful until he started running out of land. I don’t believe that micromanaging was a thing with that regime, judging by the many innovations that came about when they got ostracized by jeworld. Yes, Germans like order and authority but you can’t have a complete dictatorial regime and have innovations. This is also a bad argument.
-
Embed this notice
@p Nepotism is awesome. I wish Whites would kick all Asians out and give me a no-work gig.
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread
> All anti-White vermin lie and say the solution is hyper-natalism.
Of *course* making babies has nothing to do with the preservation of anyone's lineage.
> leave none alive in the realms of men.
I think getting laid is easier than doing genocide. It's sure as hell more fun.
-
Embed this notice
@p All anti-White vermin lie and say the solution is hyper-natalism.
Wrong. Africa can produce niggers faster than Whites can produce humans and kikes can import all brown vermin even faster. The only way to defeat the reserve army of brown turds is force. Kill any that invade as a lesson to the rest, drive them out, slay them, crucify them, leave none alive in the realms of men.
-
Embed this notice
@p @judgedread There's tanks driving down the street right now.
Idk about much of anything other than these fuckin tanks.
-
Embed this notice
@ins0mniak @judgedread Big parade today.
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread
> Tough shit. You make excuses for the kikes and run cover for the brown invasion.
"If you're not with us, you're with the terr'ists." --teh w
You've got tunnel-vision, so you think "No, I don't hate immigration" as being the same as "I fully endorse the current race-based quota system and see nothing wrong with the deals mayors make with the state to drop 20,000 Haitians in a town with a population of 40,000 people."
You kill the banks and these policies go away. You don't have to agree, but since most of the people operating the banks fit your criteria, we could just start with that and then you'd have me in the adjacent foxhole instead of in the one in the opposite side of the trench.
> This is why high IQ non-Whites should be priority deportation targets.
I can't be stopped, so good luck.
-
Embed this notice
@p Tough shit. You make excuses for the kikes and run cover for the brown invasion.
This is why high IQ non-Whites should be priority deportation targets.
-
Embed this notice
@p @judgedread I dipped early because of the rain but it was pretty cool.
Granted those drones are gonna kill me once they gain sentience but for now it was cool
-
Embed this notice
@Simpadoo @judgedread
> disingenuous
Someone is trying to push buttons; that's an indicator of a disingenuous argument. I wonder what's actually motivating you right now.
-
Embed this notice
@p @judgedread Philosophy is the study f reality using the mind as a tool. Philosophy, when done properly usually indicates when something won’t work and in this case, it doesn’t, not because it’s authoritarian but because it is against the nature of humanity and as such doomed to fail.
Also, the Church did not condemn the printing press: it just warned about its being abused. Another disingenuous argument, you must do better.
-
Embed this notice
@Simpadoo
"Their IQ is also not as high with the Chinese and so, they created their one child policy that has probably doomed them to mediocrity going forward. They failed to recognize that their edge was endless population and fell for the anti-natalist Malthusian hubris. Similar to South Korea that also killed their demographic future although this was a feminism-state propaganda deal, not forced like China."
Of all the three great human empires (America, Russia, and China), China has the most direct path to ending women's rights, and restoring birthrates. By simply issuing an edict from Xi Jinping and the CCP Standing Committee.
But National Socialism simps for women, that includes Chinese National Socialism. And if you don't believe it, note that the NJP was simping for women and pedestalizing women while it infested fedi. With many of the former NJP simps still collaborating to ban anyone who posts the truth about women on fedi.
However, the Chinese have proven themselves to be a pragmatic people. They dumped judeo-bolshevik socialism for National Socialism, when the classical communist economics didn't work. So they will probably dump women's rights by re-introducing Confucian norms into "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics."
@p
-
Embed this notice
@StarProphet @p Agree but China isn’t Germany and while Germans create stuff everybody wants due to innovation and Quality, China steals technology, applies its advantages to make it cheaper. The Natsoc model works in both countries but with different mechanisms.
Their IQ is also not as high with the Chinese and so, they created their one child policy that has probably doomed them to mediocrity going forward. They failed to recognize that their edge was endless population and fell for the anti-natalist Malthusian hubris. Similar to South Korea that also killed their demographic future although this was a feminism-state propaganda deal, not forced like China.
-
Embed this notice
@Simpadoo
"They may both be autocratic but fascism still allows for private business and the state is only involved to ensure it is working for the good of the faction. Communism is financial full retard and has no efficiencies that can sustain it."
Interestingly enough, the People's Republic of China is the most successful implementation of National Socialism and Fascism ("Socialism with Chinese Characteristics"). Private businesses can independently thrive in Xi Jinping's China, as long as the economic prosperity is for the good of the Chinese people.
@p
Chinese ZhuQue 2 landing test.mp4
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread I'm not worried.
-
Embed this notice
@p You might make it past the first screening if you're a Keanu hapa.
But DNA testing tells all.
-
Embed this notice
@p Only because for now the kikes are still winning.
You'll be very worried if neo-Hitler comes to power.
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread He'd get you before he got me.
dick flattening enthusiast
pistolero
Judge Dread
ins0mniak
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the 