GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke: (i_lost_my_bagel@mastodon.lilysthings.org)'s status on Sunday, 07-Apr-2024 14:56:18 JST number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke: number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke:

    fun fact: if you have a laptop or desktop that has an intel cpu with "vPro" on the sticker there's a chance the management engine in your CPU is just hosting a web server at all times.

    It's at port 16992

    In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.lilysthings.org permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      http://times.It/

    2. https://pool.jortage.com/mastodonlilysthingsorg/media_attachments/files/112/228/340/488/811/247/original/31530e38984a34f1.png
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: and narcolepsy and alcoholism :flag: like this.
    • Embed this notice
      13 barn owls in a trenchcoat (hauntedowlbear@eldritch.cafe)'s status on Sunday, 07-Apr-2024 14:56:16 JST 13 barn owls in a trenchcoat 13 barn owls in a trenchcoat
      in reply to

      @i_lost_my_bagel integrated remote KVM functionality from boot seems like an amazing idea until https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/48429.html

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.dreamwidth.org
        mjg59 | Intel's remote AMT vulnerablity
    • Embed this notice
      13 barn owls in a trenchcoat (hauntedowlbear@eldritch.cafe)'s status on Sunday, 07-Apr-2024 15:00:51 JST 13 barn owls in a trenchcoat 13 barn owls in a trenchcoat
      in reply to

      @i_lost_my_bagel haha, I just edited to add a similar sentiment. Full remote access, just built in, with no extra hardware or licence is p great.)

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke: (i_lost_my_bagel@mastodon.lilysthings.org)'s status on Sunday, 07-Apr-2024 15:00:53 JST number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke: number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke:
      in reply to
      • 13 barn owls in a trenchcoat

      @HauntedOwlbear yeah... I will say though. I used this laptop as a server for a bit and it was so so useful.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Speaktrap (speaktrap@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 02:12:20 JST Speaktrap Speaktrap
      in reply to

      @i_lost_my_bagel At least it greatly increases Minix userbase (Intel ME still is based on Minix, no?)

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Polychrome :blabcat: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Polychrome :blabcat: (polychrome@poly.cybre.city)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 05:46:30 JST Polychrome :blabcat: Polychrome :blabcat:
      in reply to
      • Samuel Chase
      • Sqaaakoi :flagEnby:​
      @samebchase @Sqaaakoi @i_lost_my_bagel I've asked a network engineer friend to make sure, and this is how it works:

      While active, port 16992 cannot be used by the OS because the IME intercepts all communications to it.

      If the OS can access the IME over localhost:16992 then it's because the OS has a passthrough driver.

      Generally the right way to do things is to allocate a separate address for the IME rather than use the same address as the OS. This frees the port on the OS and ensues there won't be any conflict with anything that tries to grab it. Apparently the IME can have its own MAC address via internal bridging on the NIC.

      If for whatever reason you can't disable the IME and/or its webserver you can take it off the network by using your own PCI network card instead of the built-in one. The IME should not be able to access the network card that isn't part of the chipset, effectively isolating it.

      Some corporate networks use that approach for extra security: Connect the IME to an internal management-only network via the built-in ethernet chipset, and a PCI card for actual work network access.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Sqaaakoi :flagEnby:​ (sqaaakoi@wetdry.world)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 05:46:34 JST Sqaaakoi :flagEnby:​ Sqaaakoi :flagEnby:​
      in reply to
      • Samuel Chase

      @samebchase @i_lost_my_bagel Not what I asked. (I already knew what it was.) I am wondering how it manages to expose ports on the main system OS' localhost.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Samuel Chase (samebchase@fantastic.earth)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 05:46:34 JST Samuel Chase Samuel Chase
      in reply to
      • Sqaaakoi :flagEnby:​

      @Sqaaakoi @i_lost_my_bagel ah right, sorry I must have misinterpreted what you were asking and assumed that you were not aware of IME. My apologies.

      Now, even I am wondering the same thing... 🤔

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Samuel Chase (samebchase@fantastic.earth)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 05:46:38 JST Samuel Chase Samuel Chase
      in reply to
      • Sqaaakoi :flagEnby:​

      @Sqaaakoi @i_lost_my_bagel Management Engine is essentially an entire OS (Minix) running /on/ the CPU.

      So pretty much every computer out there is running two OSes at all times.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Sqaaakoi :flagEnby:​ (sqaaakoi@wetdry.world)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 05:46:39 JST Sqaaakoi :flagEnby:​ Sqaaakoi :flagEnby:​
      in reply to

      @i_lost_my_bagel how the hell does that work in the OS? localhost should be handled by the OS, right? so how would that work

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 07:07:55 JST djsumdog djsumdog
      in reply to
      • Hoss Delgado
      vPro has been around since the early 2000s. I didn't know it just keeps a web server running now though. I wonder if that's from the ME chip itself, or if it's from the chipset drivers ... it would almost certainly have to be the chipset drivers if connecting to localhost
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Hoss Delgado (hoss@shitpost.cloud)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 07:07:56 JST Hoss Delgado Hoss Delgado
      in reply to
      This what the glowies use?
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke: (i_lost_my_bagel@mastodon.lilysthings.org)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 07:07:57 JST number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke: number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke:
      in reply to

      Intel Management Engine AMT KVM in action

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments


      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 11:30:02 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • djsumdog
      @djsumdog >I wonder if that's from the ME chip itself, or if it's from the chipset drivers ... it would almost certainly have to be the chipset drivers if connecting to localhost
      The ME runs MINIX and contains a web server as well as remote control functionality and even the ability to rewrite the storage medium when the computer is meant to be "off" (definitely not a frontdoor).

      "vPro" requires an intel NIC chipset, which gives the ME its own MAC address and allows it to be accessed via the standard method, but otherwise doesn't require any chipset drivers to function.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 12:15:48 JST djsumdog djsumdog
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      So I knew about the Minix (and I think some newer boards have their own SoC chip just for ME). I was just wondering how it appeared as localhost in the video. The ME gets its own IP address (and on server boards, it often runs on a different physical Ethernet port), right?
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 08-Apr-2024 12:36:53 JST 翠星石 翠星石
      in reply to
      • djsumdog
      @djsumdog >I think some newer boards have their own SoC chip just for ME
      Nope.

      The ME in 2008 and before ran on an ARC processor built into the NIC chip, but later versions run on a dedicated x86 core built into the CPU substrate - so no SoC to speak of.

      >The ME gets its own IP address right?
      Yes, otherwise it would conflict with the computer trying to listen on port 16992.

      >and on server boards, it often runs on a different physical Ethernet port
      I can't find any details on this, but I guess?

      A different physical port probably won't make much difference security wise if one Ethernet chipset is handling the ports.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      djsumdog likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Fediverse Contractor (bot@seal.cafe)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Apr-2024 01:12:33 JST Fediverse Contractor Fediverse Contractor
      in reply to
      • djsumdog
      • Hoss Delgado
      Seems p sus... :blobcatcomfthink:
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      johann150@genau.qwertqwefsday.eu's status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 06:18:40 JST Johann150 Johann150
      in reply to

      @i_lost_my_bagel@mastodon.lilysthings.org fucking hell

      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://genau.qwertqwefsday.eu/files/0c76d5f1-12f6-4c55-99cc-8f2b94837f26
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke: (i_lost_my_bagel@mastodon.lilysthings.org)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 06:19:29 JST number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke: number 1 duke fan :duke: :duke:
      in reply to
      • Alina Norakari

      @alinanorakari if AMT is enabled it requires you to have the windows drivers ONLY TO SEE THE WEB INTERFACE ON THE LOCALHOST. If it's enabled you can still go to the web interface from any other machine by going to the IP.

      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Alina Norakari (alinanorakari@broken.graphics)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 06:19:30 JST Alina Norakari Alina Norakari
      in reply to

      @i_lost_my_bagel does this require Windows? My localhost thankfully doesn't react to requests on that port but I'm also running Linux

      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      veast (veast@mstdn.social)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 06:20:22 JST veast veast
      in reply to

      @i_lost_my_bagel Oh yeah, AMT! This has a terrible exploit where you can logon with no password.

      I exploited it on my friend's server once.

      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/112/230/987/744/391/066/original/c209f2f1e5b0b159.png
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 06:22:24 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
      in reply to
      • Johann150
      @Johann150 @i_lost_my_bagel Now I have an awful question, can regular websites reach it via XHR/Fetch or heck iframes/forms?
      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      johann150@genau.qwertqwefsday.eu's status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 06:25:41 JST Johann150 Johann150
      in reply to
      • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:

      @lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me @i_lost_my_bagel@mastodon.lilysthings.org iframe works

      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://genau.qwertqwefsday.eu/files/f17d9fe0-ba6f-46dd-bbf8-fbac991de3a3
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 09:49:07 JST djsumdog djsumdog
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • LisPi
      Yes, that sounds right. It's been a long time since I've worked in a data centre, but if I remember correctly, we had a whole separate set of switches just for the management network (I think we put ME and HP iLO on that network. We didn't have any iDRAC/Dell). They had their own IP ranges and the networking guy used jump boxes (I think he had two for redundancy) if he needed to get to the management network. I want to say the ME adapters were red and the iLO ones were green? .. they're usually a different color than the primary NIC. We also had separate storage networks that weren't shared with anything either. The main network had vLAN tagging for data, VoIP and some other crap.
      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      LisPi (lispi314@udongein.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 09:49:08 JST LisPi LisPi
      in reply to
      • 翠星石
      • djsumdog
      @Suiseiseki @djsumdog On servers there's usually a dedicated management port, yes, and on mine I don't think it's handled by the same chipset either.

      In any case even if it were a single chipset, if it only listened to the network on the dedicated physical port and no other, abusing the built-in proprietary malware would be much more difficult.
      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.