@cwebber OK, hear me out... maybe it's controlled by a single entity, but that entity could have some kind of "offering" to sell shares of the company to the "public". Like, anyone could buy one! Then, naturally, the VCs will celebrate by purchasing billions of slices of avocado toast and lattes, and that wealth will "trickle-down" to everyone else, who will then buy their own shares. I will take my nobel prize in economics now, thank you.
@evan@mcc It's interesting to talk about "a" connected component for the Fediverse. They emerge when links are assigned randomly, but it's possible we could end up with several similarly sized connected components based on different community standards.
@cwebber I want to be able to speak intelligently enough on the subject, but I only learned enough about Bluesky/ATProto to know that I wasn't interested in using it. Do you think it's worth understanding to be able to explain to people? And/or is there a good brief explainer somewhere?
@onepict That would be nice, but I don't think we can count on the events to do it themselves. Most of the conferences in my field won't even do the bare minimum like require proof of vax
@craigmaloney Appreciate you speaking out. I've been sad and angry to see how conferences are giving up on even the simplest precautions like testing and proof of vax
@fediforum if notes are public it seems like no one would object to live blogging. Always nice for facilities to announce what level of privacy/publication to expect. For sensitive topics, some sessions might want more privacy
@aral part of the problem is that work outside large firms or vc-funded startups isn't valued by donors or the media. The director of a tech for "social good' program once told me I didn't have "experience working on real projects" because I hadn't worked for Google (despite their recruiters' best efforts).