GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPใฏๆ—ฅๆœฌใฎGNU socialใ‚ตใƒผใƒใƒผใงใ™ใ€‚
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)

  1. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Friday, 29-Mar-2024 23:46:17 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • AnarchoNinaWrites

    @AnarchoNinaWrites
    Not sure from your comments if you've taken this factor into account - it's terribly confusing even for people who work with the tech - but if Jorts blocks Meta AND activates authorized fetch, that should actually keep your posts and account info away from Meta. Under those conditions, if followers on collaborator instances boost your posts, they won't federate over to Meta for data collection

    In conversation about a year ago from gnusocial.jp permalink
  2. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Friday, 29-Mar-2024 23:46:15 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • AnarchoNinaWrites

    @AnarchoNinaWrites
    Yeah, it's something of a delicate operation to ask your admin for that. I nagged the Kolektiva admins about it a couple times, and they're about to turn it on.

    On the problem you described, I empathize, I've run into that myself. But it would only really work for you if it's activated on your instance.

    If it's any help at all, here's a link to a good write up on the subject, with admin-level information: https://hub.sunny.garden/2023/06/28/what-does-authorized_fetch-actually-do/

    In conversation about a year ago from gnusocial.jp permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: hub.sunny.garden
      What does AUTHORIZED_FETCH actually do?
      A hopefully more approachable explanation of the Mastodon configuration settings Authorized Fetch and Disallow Unauthenticated API Access
  3. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Friday, 29-Mar-2024 23:46:12 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Nour (aka Autistic Enby) ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ
    • AnarchoNinaWrites

    @autistic_enby
    True enough, authorized fetch can't solve every problem related to staying safe on social media. What's right in front of us is the prospect of Meta conducting surveillance and data collection of the information we offer up on the fedi, which up to this point has been a relative bastion of privacy respect. Activating authorized fetch can help with that and is a step in the right direction; there will be many more to take

    @AnarchoNinaWrites

    In conversation about a year ago from kolektiva.social permalink
  4. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Mar-2024 06:21:28 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Thomas ๐Ÿ”ญ๐Ÿ•น๏ธ
    • DonatellaInCali
    • Erin Kissane

    @Donatella
    You can check which instances have and haven't blocked Threads at this website:
    https://fedipact.veganism.social/?v=2

    @thomasfuchs @kissane

    In conversation about a year ago from kolektiva.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: fedipact.veganism.social
      #Fedipact - The instances blocking Zuckerberg's Threads.net
      An interactive list to see which ActivityPub (Matodon, Lemmy, FireFish, etc) instances are federating with Threads.net
  5. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Mar-2024 07:28:45 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ

    "The TikTok bill can ban apps with as few as one million monthly users, which is roughly the size of tiny apps like Mastodon."

    Remember folks, if the TikTok ban passes, it's the Democrats who will have enabled it for the next president

    https://gizmodo.com/tiktok-bill-could-get-lot-apps-banned-1851337755

    In conversation about a year ago from kolektiva.social permalink
  6. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Mar-2024 07:28:43 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • lonely extrovert

    @rothko
    Yes. Here are the Democrats enthusiastically passing authoritarian censorship bills at this very moment - rather than, say, moving heaven and earth for reproductive rights

    In conversation about a year ago from kolektiva.social permalink
  7. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Saturday, 09-Mar-2024 20:42:19 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Green Roc Thoughts
    • Jay Baker

    @GreenRoc @MediaActivist
    And if everyone gets the same degree of it, we're all equal and can't dominate one another

    In conversation about a year ago from kolektiva.social permalink
  8. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Saturday, 09-Mar-2024 20:42:17 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Green Roc Thoughts
    • econads
    • Jay Baker

    @econads
    Stop thinking enforcement, start thinking consensus

    @GreenRoc @MediaActivist

    In conversation about a year ago from gnusocial.jp permalink
  9. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Mar-2024 08:49:01 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Green Roc Thoughts
    • Jay Baker

    @MediaActivist @GreenRoc
    Oh yeah. I think that's why it's essential to understand abolition as a revolutionary project rather than a reformist one. The state can't exist without its cops, and will never relinquish them voluntarily

    In conversation about a year ago from kolektiva.social permalink
  10. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Mar-2024 08:44:28 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Green Roc Thoughts
    • Jay Baker

    @MediaActivist @GreenRoc
    Yes a great point - Graeber noted that cops are just "armed bureaucrats"

    In conversation about a year ago from kolektiva.social permalink
  11. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Mar-2024 08:39:03 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Green Roc Thoughts
    • Jay Baker

    @MediaActivist @GreenRoc
    In a system based on fear and coercion, nothing is more threatening than the assertion we can live without either

    In conversation about a year ago from kolektiva.social permalink
  12. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 15:57:09 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
    • misfit loser zealot patatas

    @tokyo_0 @smallpatatas
    On the contrary, what we suggest is the fediverse in its natural but as yet incomplete state. Why do you think community-controlled autonomous decentralized social media is something the fediverse isn't?

    In conversation Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 15:57:09 JST from kolektiva.social permalink
  13. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 15:47:05 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
    • misfit loser zealot patatas

    @tokyo_0 @smallpatatas
    You addressed 2 posts to @smallpatatas directly by tagging him at the top, other tags at the bottom, seemingly directly stating allow-list federation was "overkill" and that Meta "can be dealt with just like the others". Those were the comments I was addressing. I agree that we should be aiming together at the Zuckerbros

    In conversation Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 15:47:05 JST from kolektiva.social permalink
  14. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 15:39:17 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
    • misfit loser zealot patatas

    @tokyo_0 @smallpatatas
    Your comment was directed at @smallpatatas suggestion at consent-based federation, was it not?

    In conversation Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 15:39:17 JST from kolektiva.social permalink
  15. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 15:35:12 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
    • misfit loser zealot patatas

    @tokyo_0 @smallpatatas
    Respectfully, Meta is not remotely "just like the others", it is unquestionably a threat of a magnitude far beyond any other faced by the fedi. Gab didn't have a man in the ActivityPub project, or it's co-author bought over to their side. Gab didn't have $30 billion to piss away on a misfire called the Gabaverse. We're talking about an entity that has made a credible pass at privatizing the entire internet, all by itself. It will eat the fediverse for lunch if it wants to. It's an unprecedented threat and requires an unprecedented defense strategy, if we are to preserve the values of community-centered, decentralized autonomous social media

    In conversation Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 15:35:12 JST from kolektiva.social permalink
  16. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Dec-2023 12:29:42 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Talya (she/her)
    • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

    @tokyo_0 @Yuvalne
    The answer to your question is the caracol. Here's a further elaboration. This is a longer one, but there's "Meta is coming" material at the beginning which is now redundant, so that can be skipped: https://kolektiva.social/@ophiocephalic/110980369577922721 (edit: corrected link)

    tldr: Fedifams then form trust-treaties with other fedifams which ease federation out from the fam. The treaties can have their own terms, e.g. probationary or limited federation

    In conversation Wednesday, 27-Dec-2023 12:29:42 JST from kolektiva.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: kolektiva.social
      ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (@ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)
      from ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
      Attached: 1 image *Fediverse Communalism 1* For those interested in the prefiguration of dual power, there is a perfect opportunity right under our noses - the fediverse. Moreover, such praxis may not be so much of a choice, as a necessity. The forces of authoritarian and capitalist recuperation are coming for this network. So far, it remains largely out of the control radius of corporations, government security services and the fascists poisoning every other online environment. But there are well-resourced elements both without and within working to change that. Consider the contrast with major capitalist services. This recent story explains how the "U.S." government has attempted to extort a price from TikTok in exchange for allowing it continued operation in the country - its conversion into a domestic mass surveillance tool under the control of state security and military agencies. https://gizmodo.com/tiktok-cfius-draft-agreement-shows-spying-requests-1850759715 1/20 #FreeFediverse #FediPact #DefederateMeta #Meta #Facebook #Threads #Prefiguration #DualPower #Fedifam #Communalism
  17. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Dec-2023 12:02:23 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Talya (she/her)
    • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

    @tokyo_0 @Yuvalne
    That problem could be solved by the fedifam, which could actually better facilitate small-instance spinups, from within the instance alliance, than the current status quo

    https://kolektiva.social/@ophiocephalic/110793531238090472

    In conversation Wednesday, 27-Dec-2023 12:02:23 JST from kolektiva.social permalink
  18. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Dec-2023 11:26:05 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Talya (she/her)
    • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

    @tokyo_0
    Was wondering about your take on this. The chatter going round these parts seems to suggest two things: 1) It's still worth it to advocate for AF, which at least lifts the low-hanging fruit higher 2) Ultimately, true safety awaits us in an allow-list based federation. What do you think?
    @Yuvalne

    In conversation Wednesday, 27-Dec-2023 11:26:05 JST from kolektiva.social permalink
  19. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2023 20:20:50 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    • Brook Miles

    With the Zuckerberg takeover impending, there's a lot of confusion circulating about the use of user-level and instance-level blocks, and how our online expressions can be secured against Meta. Everyone who objects to their accounts being mined by the Zuckerberg entity for data collection, AI ingestion, monetization, and possible ghost-profile building needs to understand this problem. Here's information to clarify.

    Neither a user-level block, or an instance-level block, will protect our posts from Meta data-mining by default on a Mastodon instance. Posts won't be delivered directly, but can be ingested by other means; if, for example, users on Meta-federated instances boost them.

    However, both user and instance blocks will totally prevent post delivery in all cases IF your host instance has enabled the functionality called Authorized Fetch.

    By default, Authorized Fetch is off on Mastodon instances and most haven't turned it on. If this concern is important to you, you might want to respectfully reach out to your admins and let them know. Remember that they are working hard to provide and sustain online community at no charge. It's likely they won't be very familiar with it and will need time to look into it.

    For more information on Authorized Fetch, check out this blog post by @brook : https://hub.sunny.garden/2023/06/28/what-does-authorized_fetch-actually-do/ Please untag Brook from replies unless you specifically intend to address him

    #FediPact #DefederateMeta #Meta #Facebook #Threads #Instagram #AuthorizedFetch

    In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2023 20:20:50 JST from kolektiva.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: hub.sunny.garden
      What does AUTHORIZED_FETCH actually do?
      A hopefully more approachable explanation of the Mastodon configuration settings Authorized Fetch and Disallow Unauthenticated API Access

  20. Embed this notice
    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ (ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2023 01:11:40 JST ophiocephalic 🐍 ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ
    in reply to
    • Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
    • The Nexus of Privacy

    Authorized Fetch will help keep our accounts safe from Meta data-mining. Participate in polls on the Authorized Fetch issue here:

    by @tokyo_0: https://mas.to/@tokyo_0/111607524638174586

    by @thenexusofprivacy: https://infosec.exchange/@thenexusofprivacy/111602607824043839

    #FediPact #DefederateMeta #Meta #Facebook #Threads #Instagram #AuthorizedFetch

    In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2023 01:11:40 JST from kolektiva.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) (@tokyo_0@mas.to)
      from Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
      โ“ Did you know? Unless your instance has the "authorized_fetch" option turned on, blocking another instance as an individual user only mutes posts from that instanceโ€”and doesn't stop your publicly visible posts from being retrieved, cached and displayed on that instance. Authorized_fetch checks which instance wants to load your data before handing it over. Would you like your instance to enable #authorized_fetch? #ActivityPub #facebook #fedipact #mastoAdmin #mastodon #meta #threads #security [ ] yes, please turn on authorized_fetch [ ] no, my posts can appear on instances I blocked
    2. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      The Nexus of Privacy (@thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange)
      from The Nexus of Privacy
      A poll: if you're planning on blocking Threads , do you want your posts to federate there so that hate groups can interact with them and Meta can track you? The way blocking works on Mastodon, if your instance hasn't enabled "authorized fetch", [blocking Threads won't actually prevent your posts from federating there](https://hub.sunny.garden/2023/06/28/what-does-authorized_fetch-actually-do/) if somebody on another instance who hasn't blocked Threads boosts your post. This means that anybody on Threads can still potentially see your posts, including hate groups like Libs of TikTok and Gays Against Groomers. And Meta's privacy policy says they'll use the information to target advertising and improve their products by training AIs. And most large Mastodon instances today haven't turned on authorized fetch. If you're planning on -- or considering -- blocking Threads, do you still want your posts to federate there? #meta #threads #fedipact #fedimeta @fediverse@lemmy.world @fediversenews@venera.social [ ] No. Blocking means blocking [ ] Yes. That's how things should work! [ ] I don't care either way [ ] I'm not even considering blocking Threads, so it doesn't apply to me [ ] Not sure
  • Before

User actions

    ophiocephalic 🐍

    ophiocephalic ๐Ÿ

    Do you like my selfie? Let's build the commune!Towards a Free Fediverse beyond capitalist enclosure and the growth-at-all-costs pathology #FreeFediverse #FediPact #DefederateMetaSelfie alt-text: A friendly tree frog hangs out on a rock, while sporting a lovely hairdo comprised of two snails, one on each side of his head

    Tags
    • (None)

    Following 0

      Followers 0

        Groups 0

          Statistics

          User ID
          85958
          Member since
          7 Jan 2023
          Notices
          69
          Daily average
          0

          Feeds

          • Atom
          • Help
          • About
          • FAQ
          • TOS
          • Privacy
          • Source
          • Version
          • Contact

          GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP็ฎก็†ไบบ. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

          Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.