Notices by Jon (jonpainterphoto@lawfedi.blue)

The humor columnist has more backbone than Bezos.

Gift link: https://wapo.st/3UqHWRM

#washingtonpost #uspol #bezos

@simplycorbett @BeAware I got the S3 set up and moved videos over fine. Then when I would go to my URL, it was very slow to load pages with local videos. It would sit for 5-10 seconds before it was able to load the video. It felt like the entire site was dialup.

Has anyone set up #peertube with object storage? I gave it a shot, and got the s3 storage working, but it was slooooow, and I'm not sure if I need a proxy or if it just takes time for video to propagate across the CDN.

Using Digital Ocean Spaces.

@BeAware we don’t get scores until late September. 😂 For the moment, I’m just glad to be done.

I don't even know what to do with myself now. No law school. No bar prep.

Just struck me that I could have a drink... just watch the Olympics and live the dream.

#law

I'm starting a #peertube server, just for kicks. 🤷♂️

16 hours to the start of the bar exam...

#BarPrep

@BeAware
@rfk.jr.brain.worm

I just did a test that was successful!

@gulovsen I see the reverse. This is a huge opportunity.

“Threads or Mastodon” is a false dilemma for Masto users. People on the fediverse are less likely to jump solely to Threads.

On the flip side, a lot of Threads users saw the beta announcement and said “what the heck is the fediverse?” They received good answers from people like @evan. If they’ve entered the beta, they can see engagement from the fediverse, but they just get a notification that says “someone liked this on the fediverse.”

There’s a huge opportunity for free advertising. Every like of a threads.net account is a ping to someone who probably isn’t here, and they need to start a fedi account to experience the fediverse fully since Threads is just sending one way traffic.

Also, given I’ve seen my threads post take 7-30 minutes to pop up here, and the verification seems to be buggy, incremental integration seems necessary.

@kevinrns @jgilbert It’s worth pointing out the Supreme Court has created a 3rd party exception to the 4th amendment.

If you give information to a 3rd party - be it a bank, a teleco, Facebook, or an app that tracks cycles - a warrant isn’t required to search that information, at least as far as the US Constitution is concerned.

@TodePond @elk @Gargron why though? What’s the rationale?

@ArisuGunpla @aral @boyter Oh, what a person creates or publishes on social media is definitely owned by them, unless the service requires them to surrender their IP rights. An author’s copyright to a work begins at the creation of the work.

That’s why instances based in the US need to affirmatively create a DMCA contact to avoid liability for copyright infringement should one of their users violate someone’s copyright.

The other day I woke up convinced I screwed up the last problem on the #Evidence final. I was suddenly, absolutely sure that the statement wasn't offered for the truth of the matter asserted.

(The statement *was* offered for its truth and it advanced the conspiracy.)

Nothing like an early morning, post-finals panic attack.

#LawSchool #law #lawfedi #lawprof