Did you know? ?
Favourite counts are nearly always wrong + different depending on what server you're on?
Here's the same post when viewed on four different instances.
Did you know? ?
Favourite counts are nearly always wrong + different depending on what server you're on?
Here's the same post when viewed on four different instances.
@jonpainterphoto @elk @Gargron I'm not sure
@TodePond @jonpainterphoto @elk You've cut away half the comment, maybe it's in the other half.
@elk Why is it like this?
Back in 2019, @Gargron said it was a deliberate design decision.
Surely not?
(This comment refers to 'favourites' by the way. But the problem also affects boosts and replies.)
And this post is from months ago!
It's not because of servers being 'behind'.
One server even has the whole instance banned, so you get even less information.
The banned instance is mastodon.social, which is the first one that users are referred to on https://joinmastodon.org/servers
Even if you use your own client, like @elk, you receive different information based on what server you're logged into.
Boost counts are also consistently wrong!
Let's look at another example.
We can see four completely different pieces of information.
It's not just favourites though!
Replies are nearly always wrong too.
Mastodon's strength should be that you can pick whatever server you want.
But currently, your server choice greatly affects the information that you see.
By the way, this isn't a case of servers being slow to catch up.
The post is from over a week ago.
@Gargron @jonpainterphoto @elk Hi Eugen :)
This half? I thought that was *in addition* to rationale behind it - but I may have misunderstood. Can you confirm: Is that the whole rationale? I appreciate you responding!
@Ciantic @TodePond
Indeed, every instance seeing a different set of replies on a post is really not practical.
@TodePond Yes that's right, it can be done in client side.
There are clients I believe that do it.
The bigger problem IMO is that you don't see all replies in other people's posts. It's the same thing, with pub/sub it doesn't send you replies when you click to open a thread, it only gives those that were sent to you by pub/sub... if you don't follow a person that's not tagged you don't see their replies as well.
@Ciantic I would like my client to fetch the correct favourite + boost counts for me. I end up manually 'fetching' the info by opening the original link anyway :)
@TodePond Likes? I use them as a nod to the author, I don't care if they never went to other people.
I would like to see better boost counts, because on small servers you don't see how many people have boosted a post unless you open the post in new tab.
I understand why replies and boosts don't update, because ActivityPub is pub/sub model. If you don't follow a person, how would you get the boost count on your server?
They should add 'fetch' API if they wanted to get accurate boost counts.
@elk @Gargron I've been trying to learn more about this problem, and I don't understand why it isn't a bigger deal.
The most recent discussion on it is from over 100 days ago.
Here's the issue by the way: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/11339
@elk @Gargron I'm still trying to learn more about this problem, and I still don't understand why it isn't a bigger deal.
But what do you think though? Please let me know!
And if you know how to fix it, PLEASE let me know!!!!!
Boosts appreciated ❤️?
@niya @elk @Gargron Hey I would very much like my likes to be "public" if that's what you mean? :) You should be allowed to keep your likes private if that's what you want. User choice is great! ♥️
The like counts don't need to be perfect, but it would be great to make them more accurate than they currently are ♥️
@TodePond @elk @Gargron It's not a bigger deal because it's a problem with no workable solution. If you naively trust remote instances to report counts, they can lie to you, on the other hand if you simply start emitting like activities:
- you're now betraying the expectations of users who believed those to be private
- this still doesn't make the numbers consistent
@patak @niya @elk @Gargron Yes true! To be honest I'm a bit confused about people wanting their likes to be private. I always assumed that it's a public action :)
@TodePond @niya @elk @Gargron A private like would be a Bookmark in Mastodon, no? Or would you like to be able to like something in a way that is only public to the author of the post? Given that likes are already semi-public, and adding yet another concept seems quite complex maybe the private usage could be covered by bookmarking and DMs?
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.