GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)

  1. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 22-May-2025 04:06:53 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers

    Anybody who is a freelance developer/engineer. How do you find work? Where do you go to find opportunities? If I had an opportunity and I needed to find someone, how would I find you?

    In conversation about 11 days ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  2. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Monday, 05-May-2025 04:16:06 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers

    Remember when I said Bluesky was part of the fediverse and everybody got real mad about it? They're pretty close to enabling fully independent self-hosting.
    https://bsky.app/profile/bad-example.com/post/3loe7iy2gdc2c

    In conversation about a month ago from social.polotek.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.bsky.app
      phil (@bad-example.com)
      from phil (@bad-example.com)
      FOLKS WE DID IT ✅ I'm typing this on @aviva.gay's deer.social ✅ which posted to @alnkq.bsky.social's AppViewLite ✅ which is listening to the @blacksky.app atproto.africa relay [contains quote post or other embedded content]
  3. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 05-Dec-2024 03:54:30 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers

    ChatGPT is still wildly unprofitable. They're losing money at an exponential rate. Last estimate I read is that they have something like 10 million paying users. This says they have 300 million active users. We should expect to start seeing aggressive attempts to monetize the vast majority of non-paying users. I don't think making them pay directly is viable. Maybe ChatGPT will start returning ads as part of it's answers? 😂
    https://www.theverge.com/2024/12/4/24313097/chatgpt-300-million-weekly-users

    In conversation about 6 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.theverge.com
      ChatGPT now has over 300 million weekly users
      from Emma Roth
      ChatGPT keeps on growing.
  4. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 14-Nov-2024 10:39:38 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers

    Right. It was hard to talk about this with people before Musk. Twitter wasn't perfect by any means and people complained a lot. But some of us were trying to get people to understand what bad actually looks like. A lot of y'all took for granted how hard it is to keep the worst garbage out. And Twitter had been working on it for 15 years. Musk is reversing all of the filters that held back the tide.
    https://hachyderm.io/@thisismissem/113478119292642828

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.hachyderm.io
      Emelia 👸🏻 (@thisismissem@hachyderm.io)
      from Emelia 👸🏻
      Attached: 1 image This is a great example of how failing at community standards and moderation, and amplifying extremist views results in people becoming alienated: From: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/x-sees-largest-user-exodus-musk-takeover-rcna179793 #TrustAndSafety #Moderation
  5. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 14-Nov-2024 10:39:34 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    in reply to

    If Mastodon ever achieves the level of growth that it wants to achieve, it's gonna happen here as well. And folks will again underestimate the level of works it takes for things to stay relatively tame.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  6. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 14-Nov-2024 07:36:25 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers

    That part.
    https://alaskan.social/@seachanger/113476742302233151

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      wet forest moon folklorist (@seachanger@alaskan.social)
      from wet forest moon folklorist
      no trump didn’t personally build a whole wall and get Mexico to pay for it and he’s not personally going to deport 20 million people. he’s just naming big visions that reshape American culture sit with the fact that the dems go on their old people TV channels and openly ridicule anyone from our side who dares articulate a culture-changing bold idea and that’s their theory of power
  7. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 11:14:02 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    in reply to

    A lot of the political class assume that conservative voters were looking for permission not to vote for Trump. And we just had to find the right way to make them feel comfortable with that. But that was just never really the case.

    It's not about Trump himself. The reality is that the right wing is actually convinced that *we* are just as big an existential a threat to their way of life. They feel the same way we do. They're not voting for Trump. They are voting against us.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      http://case.It/

    2. https://cdn.masto.host/socialpoloteknet/media_attachments/files/113/438/664/189/726/626/original/826d00cb58606ad0.png
  8. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 11:14:00 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    in reply to

    The word fascism is actually hard to wrap your head around. And in true fashion, people tend to flatten and intellectualize it. Fascism isn't useful without context. It's just a tool. It's about control. The right wing seeks to control the growing culture changes that threaten to destroy their patriarchal and white supremacist hierarchies of powers. They are terrified of us. And fascism promises to help them with that.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  9. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 11:13:57 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    in reply to
    • mekka okereke :verified:

    If the Democratic party was able to accept that core truth, I think they would have a very different strategy for winning elections. I think their platform and policies would adjust accordingly. Folks like @mekkaokereke have been talking about this in detail for a long time. What if you just accepted that you don't have any influence with white conservatives, and instead you leaned into your actual base and sought to grow it from the inside? What if you just win by having more people than them?

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  10. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 09:41:17 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers

    I agree with this for the most part. Over institutions need to be overhauled. The "checks and balances" are just fundamentally broken. Maybe they always have been.

    But this also gave me another thought about political theories of change. I wonder if part of the problem is that Democrats actually want a "unity". But they won't accept that the other side doesn't actually want that at all. Regardless of whatever lip service they give.
    https://jorts.horse/@AnarchoNinaWrites/113438348289320137

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      AnarchoNinaWrites (@AnarchoNinaWrites@jorts.horse)
      from AnarchoNinaWrites
      The Democratic Party's fundamental problem is ultimately that the people they WANT to vote for them, are not going to vote for them, and the people who WOULD vote for them, want them to be significantly left of neoliberal Reaganism that got B.Clinton over. And they alternate back and forth in every election since 2000, with "pretending to agree with our base" and "telling our base to shut up and get in line." There's no fixing this without washing out the CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP of the party.
  11. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 09:41:16 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    in reply to

    One way to think of a political platform that seeks "unity" is this.

    Try to give every constituency *something* they want. That plus *their desire to unify* will convince them to come into the coalition even if it's not perfect.

    This definition explains why Democratic platforms always find ways to give concessions to right wingers. It also explains why it'll never work with the current incarnation of the right wing. They literally have no desire for unity. They want dominance.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  12. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 09:08:16 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers

    Whiteness is a hell of a drug.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  13. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Saturday, 02-Nov-2024 21:32:53 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    • Brian LeRoux ?

    @brianleroux People might say "everybody's doing it". But that's the judgmental version. The reality is that people want to be where other people are. That *is* part of their interests. So it might more sense to think of it as people making tradeoffs.

    We can still be judgmental if we believe it's not the right tradeoff. I'm just saying that the network is only as valuable as the people who show up.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  14. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Saturday, 02-Nov-2024 04:07:19 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers

    I'm still on the fence about mastodon's choice not to notify people when they get quote posted.

    In the past I wanted it this way. Because I believe getting notified created bad incentives.

    "Is this person talking to me or about me?"

    "Is this a dunk? I don't know, but I better assume it is."

    Anyway, right now I'm thinking about the tradeoff. I think I'm missing a lot of discourse because I don't get notified of people commenting on my posts.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink

    Attachments


  15. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Friday, 01-Nov-2024 09:46:51 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    • Hrefna (DHC)

    I agree with this 100%. But I would also add some other dynamics into the mix. It's not only about people being discouraged. I believe people need help to get started. Those who understand the protocols enough to help often choose not to help because they don't agree with the direction you're headed.
    cc: @hrefna
    https://hachyderm.io/@hrefna/113401096538251330

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Hrefna (DHC) (@hrefna@hachyderm.io)
      from Hrefna (DHC)
      Anyways, if you can't tell, my philosophy is simple. Let a hundred protocols blossom. Don't discourage people from doing interesting projects with protocols, even if they aren't what you would do. Encourage experimentation and encourage play. Going back to something I've talked about in union organizing: if someone is willing to _do work_ the goal is almost always to encourage that work and find ways to help make it productive, not shut it down before it has had a chance to breathe.
  16. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Friday, 01-Nov-2024 09:46:45 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    in reply to

    Something I've been saying for a while now. If you know how to program and are willing to dig in, you don't need permission to create the online world that you want. But that's not sufficient. Very few people have both the skills and fortitude to do something meaningful on their own. I would go further and say that's not even what we want.

    Creating the world we want is always a social problem. Because we need to find like-minded people to join us.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  17. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Monday, 14-Oct-2024 08:32:29 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    • Jenniferplusplus

    @jenniferplusplus sorry. I don't mean to invoke a generalized "human nature" argument. I'm talking about the demonstrated culture of open source. I do think that we see people create and maintain hierarchies more often than not. Even when they swear that's not what they want. But it's bad enough without being overstated.

    In conversation about 8 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  18. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Saturday, 12-Oct-2024 08:28:13 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers

    I don't think I've ever regretting setting up push-button deploys on a new project. It always feels like overkill. But once you get it set up, there are huge benefits in your ability to iterate quickly.

    I've definitely gotten too far down the road and regretted that I didn't make it easier to deploy early on.

    I'm thinking critically about these lessons as I get into helping people start new projects. Some things you don't need. But this one still holds up.

    In conversation about 8 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  19. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 03-Oct-2024 17:43:41 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    in reply to
    • Eugen Rochko
    • Fediverse Report
    • poswald
    • Erin Kissane

    @Gargron @poswald @kissane @fediversereport feel free to explain the actual reason this is such a persistent problem. I don't mind being corrected. But please don’t let that be the only reason you pop in.

    In conversation about 8 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  20. Embed this notice
    Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Thursday, 03-Oct-2024 11:33:37 JST Marco Rogers Marco Rogers
    • Fediverse Report
    • Erin Kissane

    @kissane @fediversereport I always thought of this as the fundamental technical problem to solve for distributed social networks. And we're just... not solving it. People are talking about everything else besides this. And it's so weird to me.

    In conversation about 8 months ago from social.polotek.net permalink
  • Before

User actions

    Marco Rogers

    Marco Rogers

    Web developer, movie buff, and pretty much the best guy you know. Married to @operaqueenie

    Tags
    • (None)

    Following 0

      Followers 0

        Groups 0

          Statistics

          User ID
          222890
          Member since
          13 Dec 2023
          Notices
          302
          Daily average
          1

          Feeds

          • Atom
          • Help
          • About
          • FAQ
          • TOS
          • Privacy
          • Source
          • Version
          • Contact

          GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

          Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.