Notices by Moffin'tosh (moffintosh@mastodon.cloud)

@Radical_EgoCom @facsimile_willows @TheDialecticalCommunist Is it fucking really? Because one at least implies running defense for them

@Radical_EgoCom Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa, notorious socialist countries

@georgia ...I'm watching a video about the Ice King...👀

CRITICAL SUPPORT FOR ANTI-CHRISTOID #NATO✊🇺🇲🇪🇺

@adiz Uh?

@kaia Where does South-Tirol fit?

@jordinn
> Biden attempted

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

@sun @jeffcliff Left? Where?

@Amikke @icedquinn
> we can't just tear them down
How come?

Commie blocks are awesome, actually (a reply to Living Ironically in Europe & NFKRZ)
https://youtu.be/Wt_Pl0jFBHk

@aral ...is this the JS equivalent of a Rust enum?

#cuteposting #GenshinImpact

@LukeAlmighty
> Government is not generating profit by buying medicine...
The hell are you talking about? Of course it doesn't.
Goverments don't even need to profit, if they wanted money they could just print it

@LukeAlmighty The goal is to profit, bit is the method of profiteering that you are wrong about.
There is a reason there has been a generelized push to privatize healthcare all over the planet: from China to Italy, from Canada to Vietnam, from France to the UK. It has resulted in an increase in prices for common people and fatter dividends for the shareholders across the entire world.

@LukeAlmighty @Humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club
> An entity which has a monopoly on buying has less power than a bunch of small aquirents against an international cartel

@LukeAlmighty @Humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club Yes, that's called buying because we haven't nationalized medicine production

@dictatordave

@LukeAlmighty @Humpleupagus The fun thing is that our goverment has been cutting public health care funding while increasing the money they give to the privates, and waiting time has gone up with an almost linear relationship, while the price of the privates have stayed the same.

@Humpleupagus No, read

@MasterSimper @Humpleupagus It isn't.
Or rather, if you want to define "public health" like that you're free to do so, but if so I will define "maximizing the number of people who live healthly while minimizing death and human sufference" as "potatoism"