GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)

  1. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Monday, 10-Nov-2025 02:36:29 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to
    • kaia

    @kaia OK but that is actually when I purchased my last PC and pretty close to when I'm expecting to buy my next one. I'm already on that ten year upgrade cycle and it's kinda nice tbh. Unlike Dell and HP and such, System76 does not produce instant e-waste. We need a whole lot more of that in this world...

    In conversation about 11 days ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  2. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Thursday, 30-Oct-2025 05:54:27 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to
    • Democracy Dies in Dumbass
    • John Mierau
    • Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

    @benroyce @john @ShredderFeeder Not everyone has the time to do that research. It ain't always easy. I'm regularly voting based on literally nothing more than a four year old interview on local radio from when the person was running for some different office. And for some races even that would be a lot of information. In at least one election all I could find to go on were photos of the candidate putting up yard signs! You only even get *claims* about what they want to accomplish at the highest level races, and even those require carefully watching their past history to know if they actually believe a single damn word of it. I struggle to figure this shit out and I'm invested enough to be taking classes on how to research candidates!

    It'd be great if we had a party that actually held their candidates to some standard; an organization to do some of that vetting for us; instead of Ds and Rs that switch parties like an NFL draft without actually changing their positions...

    Running under either party is basically just running with a corporate sponsor at this point. The only thing it proves is money and/or connections. And if you truly believe that people can all independently determine and vote for the best candidate then why does it matter which party? Why do we need parties at all? These organizations are either irrelevant or failures. Or they're highly successful as gatekeepers against us.

    In conversation about 21 days ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  3. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Thursday, 16-Oct-2025 03:48:41 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to
    • Becca

    @bweller Seems like pretty obvious bullshit to me. There is no logical reason for them to do this, and the cartels are not stupid. And there's no evidence beyond statements from frequent liars in Trump's admin. This is the same "violent paid protesters" shit they've been trying to sell for years. Just more fabricated justifications for their own brutality.

    In conversation about a month ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  4. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Thursday, 02-Oct-2025 21:30:25 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to
    • Aral Balkan
    • MiniMia 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🇵🇸 🏴

    @fkamiah17 @aral Any idea if Fair Lady was captured? They were having engine trouble and were literally sailing, and were one of the last still going last night...but they were in the back of the pack.

    According to Al Jazeera, Israel says one boat still sailing that will be stopped if it attempts to breach the blockade -- implying they haven't even tried. Feels like either an insult to sameone far behind or they're just referring to one of the legal support ships.

    In conversation about 2 months ago from gnusocial.jp permalink
  5. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Saturday, 23-Aug-2025 03:23:40 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to
    • BeAware :fediverse:

    @BeAware they also said bluesky was decentralized...

    In conversation about 3 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  6. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Friday, 25-Jul-2025 03:07:48 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to
    • Maj - 🇨🇦

    @maj “They falsely stated that I, a U.S. citizen, have no constitutional rights at a point of entry"

    That's not exactly false. That's been the situation for a LONG time now.
    https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-zone

    In conversation about 4 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      The Constitution in the 100-Mile Border Zone | American Civil Liberties Union
      from American Civil Liberties Union
      The Problem The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects Americans from random and arbitrary stops and searches. According to the government, however, these basic constitutional principles do not apply fully at our borders. For example, at border crossings (also called "ports of entry"), federal authorities do not need a warrant or even suspicion of wrongdoing to justify conducting what courts have called a "routine search," such as searching luggage or a vehicle. Even in places far removed from the border, deep into the interior of the country, immigration officials enjoy broad—though not limitless—powers. Specifically, federal regulations give U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) authority to operate within 100 miles of any U.S. "external boundary." In this 100-mile zone, Border Patrol agents have certain additional authorities. For instance, Border Patrol can operate immigration checkpoints. Border Patrol, nevertheless, cannot pull anyone over without "reasonable suspicion" of an immigration violation or crime (reasonable suspicion is more than just a "hunch"). Similarly, Border Patrol cannot search vehicles in the 100-mile zone without a warrant or "probable cause" (a reasonable belief, based on the circumstances, that an immigration violation or crime has likely occurred). In practice, Border Patrol agents routinely ignore or misunderstand the limits of their legal authority in the course of individual stops, resulting in violations of the constitutional rights of innocent people. These problems are compounded by inadequate training for Border Patrol agents, a lack of oversight by CBP and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the consistent failure of CBP to hold agents accountable for abuse. No matter what CBP officers and Border Patrol agents think, our Constitution applies throughout the United States, including within this “100-mile border zone.” Much of U.S. Population Affected Many people think that border-related policies only impact people living in border towns like El Paso or San Diego. The reality is that Border Patrol's interior enforcement operations encroach deep into and across the United States, affecting the majority of Americans. Roughly two-thirds of the United States' population lives within the 100-mile zone—that is, within 100 miles of a U.S. land or coastal border. That's about 200 million people. Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont lie entirely or almost entirely within this area. Nine of the ten largest U.S. metropolitan areas, as determined by the 2010 Census, also fall within this zone: New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia, Phoenix, San Antonio, San Diego and San Jose. Outdated Legal Authority and Lack of Oversight The regulations establishing the 100-mile border zone were adopted by the U.S. Department of Justice in 1953—without any public comments or debate. At the time, there were fewer than 1,100 Border Patrol agents nationwide; today, there are over 21,000. The Border Patrol often ignores this regulation and, aside from limiting interior checkpoint locations to within the 100-mile zone, rejects any geographic limitation on agents' authority. At least two federal circuit courts condone Border Patrol operations outside the 100-mile zone, federal regulations and Supreme Court precedent notwithstanding. Federal border agents are stopping, interrogating, and searching Americans on an everyday basis with absolutely no suspicion of wrongdoing, and often in ways that our Constitution does not permit. For example, Border Patrol, according to news reports, operates approximately 170 interior checkpoints throughout the country (the actual number in operation at any given time is not publicly known). The ACLU believes that these checkpoints amount to dragnet, suspicionless stops that cannot be reconciled with Fourth Amendment protections. The Supreme Court has upheld the use of immigration checkpoints, but only insofar as the stops consist only of a brief and limited inquiry into residence status. Checkpoints cannot be primarily used for drug-search or general law enforcement efforts. In practice, however, Border Patrol agents often do not limit themselves to brief immigration inquiries and regularly conduct criminal investigations and illegal searches at checkpoints. The Border Patrol also frequently pulls over motorists in "roving patrol" stops, often without any suspicion that an immigration violation has occurred. The ACLU has documented numerous cases of abuse by Border Patrol and filed lawsuits to obtain more information about the agency's practices. Given Border Patrol's lack of transparency, and in the absence of any meaningful oversight, there is still much that we don't know about the full extent and impact of these interior "border enforcement" operations. Part of a Broader Problem The spread of border-related powers inland is inseparable from the broader expansion of government intrusion in the lives of ordinary Americans. For example, CBP claims the authority to conduct suspicionless searches of travelers' electronic devices—such as laptops and cell phones—at ports of entry, including international arrivals at airports. These searches are particularly invasive as a result of the wealth of personal information stored on such devices. At least one circuit court has held that federal officers must have at least "reasonable suspicion" prior to conducting such searches and recent Supreme Court precedent seems to support that view. These practices also coincide with the spread of numerous border technologies, including watch list and database systems (such as the Automated Targeting System traveler risk assessment program), advanced identification and tracking systems (including electronic passports), and intrusive technological schemes such as the "virtual border fence" and unmanned aerial vehicles (aka "drone aircraft"). With many of these technologies in the hands of private companies, there are powerful financial incentives for the continued "militarization" of the border zone. The expansion of government power both at and near the border is part of a trend toward expanding police and national security powers without regard to the effect of such expansion on our most fundamental and treasured Constitutional rights. The federal government's dragnet approach to law enforcement and national security is one that is increasingly turning us all into suspects. If Americans do not continue to challenge the expansion of federal power over the individual, we risk forfeiting the fundamental rights and freedoms that we inherited—including the right to simply go about our business free from government interference, harassment and abuse. Read the ACLU factsheet on Custom and Border Protection's 100-mile zone Tell Congress: Don't fund Trump's border troops
  7. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Jul-2025 15:44:33 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    • Veronica Explains

    @vkc Voted for KDE although I gave up on both of them a couple years ago for Enlightenment which is SO MUCH BETTER! ;)

    1) I dislike Gnome because I don't want to have to rely on a bunch of third-party extensions from god only knows where for crap that should just be a checkbox in the settings app.

    2) Last time I used Gnome I couldn't even use the system settings app anyway -- it was taller than my screen, it wouldn't let me move it, it wouldn't let me shrink it, I couldn't hit the apply button because it was off the screen and about 80% of that vertical space was just empty space between options. They prioritize obnoxious unnecessary white space over basic accessibilty.

    3) I gave up on KDE shortly after 4.0 not because it lacked any features or functionality, but because it was a bit slow and a bit unstable. So if forced to choose I'd just hope those issues had improved.

    In conversation about 4 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  8. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Thursday, 03-Jul-2025 09:15:30 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk

    Christ when did utility poles become cache that needs to be constantly refreshed??

    These executives must be *freaked* if they're sending goons out to rip paper off poles every day...

    In conversation about 5 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  9. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Thursday, 20-Feb-2025 11:46:44 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to
    • Lauren Weinstein

    @lauren stumbled into this lovely example of that at work recently...and no, I was not trying to use any AI:

    In conversation about 9 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com/system/media_attachments/files/114/033/425/183/370/228/original/7e931af150bc6756.jpeg
  10. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Tuesday, 28-Jan-2025 10:22:17 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    • Mr. Bill

    @bmacDonald94 I have Signal on my Android phone without any Google account connected...?

    In conversation about 10 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  11. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Saturday, 25-Jan-2025 14:24:45 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to
    • LFA

    @lfa What server software are you running?

    In conversation about 10 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  12. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Saturday, 25-Jan-2025 06:54:59 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk

    What's the current consensus on secure decentralized chat apps? We still on IRC/Jabber/Jitsi or is that all old news?

    Apparently people are thinking that storing a copy of the Signal app will be enough to prevent fascists from shutting down secure comms. But of course, Signal is centralized so it'd be relatively easy to shut it down server-side. And while the code is all open, Signal has gone out of their way to shut down other projects trying to build on that code, so it probably would not be easy to make use of that at this point...

    So should I just back up some Jabber apps and throw a server together or what? :)

    In conversation about 10 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  13. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 04:17:03 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk

    Corporate putting in all of these extra hoops to jump through for "security" just to have the admins responsible for these systems go "I dunno what you're talking about, I'll just give you root access and you can do it yourself."

    In conversation about 10 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  14. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 04:17:02 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to

    Lovely, even after explaining that corporate policy prohibits me from knowing the password to this account the admins are demanding that I be the one to choose the new password. OK then, I guess I'll take that secret unauthorized privilege escalation if you're just handing them out like fuckin candy...

    In conversation about 10 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  15. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 04:17:01 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to

    Our unix admins seem very confused by the concept of FUCKING SSH

    In conversation about 10 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  16. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 04:17:00 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to

    We've been trying to get this issue fixed since last week. It's fucking Thursday. "This issue" is a goddamn expired password on a service account whose password should not ever expire it the first place (it shouldn't allow you to login with the password, we don't need that, but now we can't login even without the password because it's expired.)

    BUT PRIVATE CORPORATIONS ARE SOOO EFFICIENT!

    In conversation about 10 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  17. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 18:52:58 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk

    Oh god I fear I've gone full middle-aged suburban white dad. For a minute there I was seriously considering trying to 3D print some kind of utility belt for holding a coffee cup.

    But like...it's cold, so I want to bring some hot tea for the walk. But it's cold, so I would like to put my hands in my pockets not have to be holding the cup! I mean I could modify a bag to keep the cup upright easily enough but it'd still be a two hand operation to get it out and put it back...with a belt clip it could pop right off with one hand!

    Sometimes I can just pocket that shit...but only if those aren't already filled with books and electronics...

    In conversation about 10 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  18. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Sunday, 05-Jan-2025 08:13:49 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    in reply to
    • Brian Sullivan
    • Adrianna Tan

    @briansullivan @skinnylatte Yeah they definitely scam this. I worked for Tata for a few years. The trick is, your job is not your job. I was either an application team member, or a level three dev, or a senior analyst depending on who you asked. You'll have two guys trading shifts doing exactly the same work but the guy with a year more experience is here on an H1B and HR says he's a level 2 and the American working the other shift is a level 3 so the guy with the H1B gets paid 15% less.

    And they'll justify that with education or annual reviews (which are largely political negotiations between managers) or whatever, but the fact is they're both doing the same work but the H1B worker gets paid less. And usually they work way more hours too. Because if they don't, they might no longer be in the top x% of the team and they'll get sent back to the team in India and one of those folks gets sent over here to replace them.

    In conversation about 11 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  19. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Friday, 27-Dec-2024 12:54:49 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk

    @FediTips I remember learning this when they first introduced edits but I think edits weren't widely supported by clients yet or something, so by the time I started seeing edits in the wild I'd forgotten. Just tried it out and it is excellent! Especially when someone edits a reallly long post, after you've boosted it. You get a notification that it changed, but it's good to be able to quickly know *what* they changed that now got your pre-emptive endorsement. Thanks for the reminder!

    In conversation about 11 months ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  20. Embed this notice
    SlightlyCyberpunk (admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com)'s status on Tuesday, 24-Dec-2024 13:37:11 JST SlightlyCyberpunk SlightlyCyberpunk
    • Brian Vastag

    @brianvastag Oh shit it finally happened...I've been wondering when this would become a thing.

    See, if you had ever asked my father what kind of music he listened to, you'd get specific artists and a detailed listing of subgenres. If you ask my mom what music she likes, you'll get an answer like "something happy"

    The musicians my dad listened to probably do alright, but they certainly aren't world-famous millionaires. The musicians my mom listens to are though, because it's just whatever is on the radio, whatever is popular. Always felt weird that you kinda get paid more to make music for people who don't give a shit than you do if you make music for people who are super passionate about it. The easier you are to replace, the more money you seem to get.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Spotify is doing a good thing...but it did feel kinda inevitable to me that something like this would happen eventually...the secrecy and fraud ought to offend anyone, but I'm sure plenty of listeners had no issue with the music itself...

    I just pictured the outcome being cheap tracks for streaming platforms and more exposure for random garage bands. But I guess I should have predicted fake bands instead, this is capitalism we're talking about after all...

    In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com permalink
  • Before

User actions

    SlightlyCyberpunk

    SlightlyCyberpunk

    Anti-social anarcho-syndicalist slacker, maker, and code monkey. Soldering irons to semicolons and everything in between.

    Tags
    • (None)

    Following 0

      Followers 0

        Groups 0

          Statistics

          User ID
          20571
          Member since
          8 Nov 2022
          Notices
          55
          Daily average
          0

          Feeds

          • Atom
          • Help
          • About
          • FAQ
          • TOS
          • Privacy
          • Source
          • Version
          • Contact

          GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

          Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.