@sun@shitposter.world@silverpill@mitra.social@feld@friedcheese.us For content migration and independent handle from domain/software/instance, clearly yes. It's technically built-in by design. For self-ddos, I don't know how it's achieve in practice, but yes, posting link on bluesky with millions of people reading it it's just a no-op for my server. Posting a link to Fediverse for 3k followers just hammer my blog server…
@sun@shitposter.world@silverpill@mitra.social@feld@friedcheese.us AP have no potential because of very serious trouble from the start. Typically, tying domain to instance and confusing frontend with backend are very strange and hard to change choice, with very tedious trouble because of that.
@sun@shitposter.world@feld@friedcheese.us@silverpill@mitra.social ActivityPub is very hard to explain too in all cases. And some of very huge limitation of this protocol is very badly and poorly know for user. AT is perhaps hard for maintainer, but AP is hard for users…
@sun@shitposter.world@feld@friedcheese.us@silverpill@mitra.social People unable to migrate because loosing content if changing instance or worst, software… I litterally lost 200k post on Fediverse because switching from Mastodon to Firefish. Loosing tons of followers because migration process is botchered. Having to keep my previous software up if I want to keep my content despite migration to a new software. Forced to migrate domain to change software.
@silverpill@mitra.social And since january 2023 (if I remember correctly), production switch to the decentralized version, with load balancing of the main single PDS to multiple one. You can host your own PDS if you want.
@silverpill@mitra.social And currently BlueSky achieve something Fediverse is totally impossible to do. Migrating tons of account from one PDS to another without losing a single piece of data.
@silverpill@mitra.social Currently, BlueSky is even MORE federated than Fediverse. You can move from one PDS to another without losing a single follower or worse, content. If you move from one PDS to another, you lost litterally nothing. No migration to do. No content conversion. Fediverse just CAN'T do that. You loose at least all your previous content and need a full following/followers migration, witch is NOT possible if your starting or future instance is under censorship (both instance MUST be available from all other instances to be able to migrate)
@silverpill@mitra.social That's the current status of federation on BlueSky : full federated. And even more federated than the Fediverse (because of easier migration with no loss between instances)
@silverpill@mitra.social BlueSky is even more federated than Fediverse they federate THE MODERATION. There is no "instance moderation". The moderation is federated. You can moderate ANY content on ANY instance. Even not your.
@silverpill@mitra.social In BlueSky, i can even say "Hey, my government censor my account domain name, but hey, you can join my PDS on my .onion address or here is alternative clearnet domain name". It's NOT possible to do on the Fediverse. Require a full operational migration.
@silverpill@mitra.social This is completly false. Bluesky is decentralized since beginning of 2023. And the fediverse would be very censored with less than 10 major instances censorship. Migration no more possible for old account. Tons of things just doesn't work, etc.