@eribosot how about both, and see which fly best on each?
Notices by UkeleleEric (ukeleleeric@mstdn.social)
-
Embed this notice
UkeleleEric (ukeleleeric@mstdn.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Nov-2024 18:40:11 JST UkeleleEric -
Embed this notice
UkeleleEric (ukeleleeric@mstdn.social)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Nov-2024 18:50:11 JST UkeleleEric @eribosot obviously written by someone with a kitchen the size of some people's houses...
-
Embed this notice
UkeleleEric (ukeleleeric@mstdn.social)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Oct-2024 22:43:32 JST UkeleleEric @br00t4c so, apparently freedom of speech doesn't exist in Australia either...
-
Embed this notice
UkeleleEric (ukeleleeric@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 13-Sep-2024 17:12:29 JST UkeleleEric @Radical_EgoCom But, the fact that the atheist hasn't proved any case puts us exactly back to the start - is there a start, and what was the precursor or first cause? Who/what was the initial cause for the first effect? It appears to be that for every effect or result, there's a cause - this appears to be universal in every field studied. Also, something that appears to be designed suggests a designer. A completely open mind would not be atheist, just agnostic at least, or some form of theist.