Notices by F4GRX Sébastien (f4grx@chaos.social), page 2

@sebsauvage @bortzmeyer merci.

@crowdagger @alluccia @b3nb3n avec le frein a main serré méoui.

@kashhill chatgpt himself.

@sabik @selzero what IDEs are you using, friends?

@mattly @thomasfuchs With ublock origin enabled, it's 9.1 MB, says firefox.

@whitequark @http_error_418 @gsuberland ikea has some of this stuff. you're motivating me to have a look but heh, I already live in too many rabbit holes.

@dalias @homegrown so if a browser already restricts the sent referer, this new header should change nothing.

however it's beneficial for people using browser with bad privacy parameters right? Assuming the browser complies with this header.

@homegrown @dalias I am a bit confused about actual browser behaviours with privacy settings.

Not sure how this header combines with browser settings.

@homegrown @dalias I have no idea where the code that sets the "https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Headers/Referer" header is situated, I believe it's in the browser.

I understand better now: mastodon sets a "Referer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin" header, which merely seem to tell the brower "please just send the domain in the referer header of your requests"

which it has no obligation to do.

@homegrown @dalias it sends "Just the domain" (maybe) from a particular client IP, which associates the mastodon instance with that particular person, identified by its IP address.

@breizh @lord exactement. Donc en plus de legitimiser le concept du vol d'infos pour construire les AI, ils payeront jamais.

Vu les milliards de revenus engendrés je suis pas certain qu'un prix "raisonnable" soit une rémunération juste du niveau actuel de pillage.

C'est pareil que quand qn avait voulu legitimiser le vol d'infos privées en payant ceux qui partagent, ca faisait pas plus de qq euros par an, soit tres largement en deçà des revenus publicitaires des boites payeuses.

@breizh @lord oui, et est ce qu'ils vont s'interdire de scraper si le prix leur convient pas? Non. Ils changeront d'user agent.

@lord c'est aussi con que de se faire payer pour vendre ses données personnelles. Ca normalise le truc et le rend acceptable. je suis totalement contre.

@lord non, ils payeront, tkt. Ca sera toujours moins cher que du compute gpu.

Pour moi le problème est surtout de legitimiser le crawl abusif. Et rendre la chose acceptable, genre recevoir du pignon pour se faire enc... Je veux dire piquer des volumes gargantuesques de donnees en toute impunité puisqu'il y a contrepartie.

Et OUI, vaut mieux le bordel actuel, et la grogne, et le blocage avec anubis, et les honeypots pour pourrir leurs corpus.

@whitequark startpage gave this with the 1001-011 search request https://geo-matching.com/products/high-performance-tactical-grade-mems-gyroscope

(I considered the second line a date code and the third line a lot code)

@whitequark can you post a relatively better res pic of one gyro? ideally one with a visible part number? :)

@whitequark looks like they did the vital minimum for the customer that wanted a cheaper adis16488. it just outputs the rates, and integration is made outside. probably the gd103 just translates spi protocols.

@whitequark no, it's quite complex and painful to characterize, there's a lot of noise measurements to be made, but these are statistical and I am unable to wrap my head around an actual meaning. it's just frustrating.

All I know is that when you use a gyro for dead reckoning, you integrate the rate over time twice and if the measurement has any bias, the integrated result will drift quadratically. Moreover, this "zero rate bias" varies with temperature and also if you look at the box sideways.

@whitequark oh, did you try to make one run before teardown? They look quite nice. they're probably better than your average MPU6050.

@whitequark aha, gold plated CLCC gyros?