Just because large scale social media has trained us out of creating the internet we need doesn't mean we can't have it.
Once upon a time, people designed and curated digital spaces according to their goals and values. We can still do that, and we can use it to meet our missions.
Loved this episode of the @sustainoss podcast, about @ntnsndr’s book Governable Spaces: Democratic Design for Online Life.
I’ve been plagued by frustration for so long now that our online spaces don’t provide sufficient tooling for shared negotiation, instead defaulting to blunt mechanisms for shutting things down.
This was a great discussion about how things could be better.
Conflict is never easy in the first place, but when you throw the internet into the equation, wild shit can happen.
The internet: it’s for beef.
I get why so many leaders want to avoid harnessing the power of extended constituencies all together. But if you want build something that makes a true difference, I don't think you get there at this point in human history without tapping into the power of the internet.
In an age where gen AI makes it much cheaper to produce code, the ability to read, comprehend, and review code becomes that much more crucial.
Until and unless businesses and executives recognize this, they won’t actually be able to realize the economic upside of AI because they’ll be too busy creating so many fires which need putting out. https://cute.is/@keith/112191562540684140
My assertion that grappling with the increasing importance of code review is literally a business imperative came to me while reading @grimalkina@KFosterMarks and @CSLee’s excellent work on AI skill threat:
So, why are so many executives and investors overlooking this very basic reality that code produced is code which must be maintained, and that an acceleration of code produced thanks to gen AI means ~more risk~, not just more $$$?
I have friends who are Principal Engineers asking themselves this very question right now.
And in response, I point us to the classic Upton Sinclair quote: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
We've arrived at a place where we have to explain why it is our species has gotten this far, and why we shouldn't ignore those dynamics in our extremely short-term focus on this quarter and maybe the next.
I have a core of compatriots who are trying to make our industry more rigorous, visionary, and kind.
And what I’ve realized in recent weeks is we're all out here working to explicate what’s made our species successful from first principles BECAUSE WE HAVE TO.
Turns out psychological safety isn't a "nice to have”. Turns out balancing competition with cooperation is better for long-term outcomes. Turns out when you show up for people, they want to show up for you. Turns out organizations are comprised of humans, squishy and emergent, and org charts and spreadsheets are only lagging indicators of reality.
@grimalkina I was having a conversation some years back with someone with a neuroscience PhD and a psych background. I acknowledged that I was feeling real insecurity about having recently joined “a really high performing team”.
She says to me “You know who else is high performing? Dogs in dog shows.”
Principal, Uploop. Guerrilla researcher. Community systems designer. I turn developer tools into movements. Ex Stack Overflow, Shapeways, Nodejitsu. Invested in the deliberate practice of a brighter future. she/they