Notices by soaproot (soaproot@sfba.social), page 2

@moo @tillshadeisgone I don't really know a lot of the details but I was looking at a guppe-like (but not guppe itself) service at https://fedigroups.social/@hello/112056551685065619 and they say "And unlike other group services, we work across the fediverse AND have controls to help you limit content/abuse."

@tillshadeisgone I feel sorry for the kid. Was a lot easier to just chalk this up to people being ridiculous except for that detail.

@tchambers @jwcph @fediversenews @hachyderm Looks like a good approach to me. One very nit-picky point: "Spammers and toxic accounts inside the P92 network we or our social graph don’t follow" should read something like "interact with" instead of "follow" because DM spam, or toxic replies, can happen even if you don't follow the bad account (as you seem to be aware of based on the rest of the document).

@jwcph @tchambers @fediversenews @hachyderm I'm a little worried about meta hosting bad content (brigading, hate speech, etc) and it harming us via federation. I'm even more worried about us becoming meta, in the sense of figuring that kind of bad content is just too hard to stop and we don't really need to stop it and so on. Whether federating makes that more or less likely, I'm not too sure, but I do think vigilance will be needed either way.

@ammdias @MartinVeart @wikipedia Yes we are obligated to say of course we do not condone Wikipedia vandalism. And when, er I mean if, I do snicker at these things it is a bit of a guilty pleasure for exactly this reason. But I am far too circumspect to admit whether I snickered at this one or not.

@dansup That's a perfectly logical and well written interview for a serious outlet like The Verge. But just between us here on the elephant site, they completely missed the part about #JohnMastodon 's contributions. (Shh, don't tell them, they'll never see it coming).