Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 08:54:19 JST Bread up, Bro
   I'm just tired, guys
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 08:58:38 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • PalePimp
     • sky-rider of the spaceways
     @PalePimp @spacemanspiff this isn't even a jew thing, almost certainly. This is just a "not doing the liberalism thing"
   • Embed this notice
     sky-rider of the spaceways (spacemanspiff@noauthority.social)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 08:58:39 JST sky-rider of the spaceways

     in reply to

     @sickburnbro

     what the fuck? we elect people to do things and it literally means nothing if they aren't democrat.

   • Embed this notice
     PalePimp (palepimp@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 08:58:39 JST PalePimp

     in reply to

     • sky-rider of the spaceways
     @spacemanspiff @sickburnbro Pretty much yes. Who's side has the most jews?
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 09:06:07 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • HonkHonkBoom
     @HonkHonkBoom and I think rule of law has had this problem before, and the outcomes aren't great.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 09:06:08 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • HonkHonkBoom
     @HonkHonkBoom the problem is that I think people see judges as still very neutral because the whole validity of the system rides upon it.
     
     If you start assuming the vast majority of judges are just politicians in robes, what the fuck is the point of them
   • Embed this notice
     HonkHonkBoom (honkhonkboom@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 09:06:09 JST HonkHonkBoom

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro None of this gets better until judges start forgetting to wake up in the morning, or ever.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 21:59:38 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • PopulistRight
     @PopulistRight I mean, SCOTUS decisions matter only if the lower courts respect them.
     
     If in classic GOP fashion the SCOTUS goes "gee guys, we told them to stop, there's nothing we can do!"
     
     it's just rule by 10,000 petty kings
   • Embed this notice
     PopulistRight (populistright@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 21:59:39 JST PopulistRight

     in reply to

     @sickburnbro All part of the BIG FAKE SHOW. Only SCOTUS decisions matter, regardless.

   • Embed this notice
     nobullyplz :antibully: (nobullyplz@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 22:01:40 JST nobullyplz :antibully:

     in reply to

     • Bad Druid
     • HonkHonkBoom
     @Druid @sickburnbro @HonkHonkBoom New guy sweating sitting on the seat in the back
     "Yeah I uh, hate that guy too. I'll be a good judge, promise" :monkas:
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 22:01:40 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • nobullyplz :antibully:
     • Bad Druid
     • HonkHonkBoom
     @nobullyplz @Druid @HonkHonkBoom there are some hilarious examples of what kings have done to corrupt judges, but I feel like you may need a king to deal with corruption in judiciary because the nature of the law.
   • Embed this notice
     Bad Druid (druid@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Mar-2026 22:01:41 JST Bad Druid

     in reply to

     • HonkHonkBoom
     @sickburnbro @HonkHonkBoom Whenever we talk about corrupt judges and how to deal with them I keep thinking about this painting.
     
     (painted in 1488 btw)