Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   David Revoy (davidrevoy@framapiaf.org)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 05:09:32 JST David Revoy

   How my Firefox became a LibreWolf

   New blog-post: https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1065/how-my-firefox-became-a-librewolf

   #firefox #librewolf #tos #webcomic

   • iced depresso, Puniko ?, clacke and prettygood like this.
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 05:44:00 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     @davidrevoy@framapiaf.org I now wonder what a GNU IceCat looks like.

   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 18:10:58 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • SuperDicq
     @SuperDicq @davidrevoy
     SuperDicq repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 21:57:44 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @davidrevoy @Linux_Is_Best I'm not sure why you would write all that instead of writing that Vivaldi is proprietary malware (it is).
   • Embed this notice
     David Revoy (davidrevoy@framapiaf.org)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 21:57:45 JST David Revoy

     in reply to

     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux

     @Linux_Is_Best You know Vivaldi is not free/libre and open source software, right?

   • Embed this notice
     Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux (linux_is_best@misskey.de)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 21:57:47 JST Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux

     in reply to

     @davidrevoy@framapiaf.org As someone who used to help contribute to Firefox, and who, outside the development, made a Linux installer for Firefox ("Firefox Automatic Installer for Linux"), I absolutely hate LibreWolf. -- Why? 🤔
     
     LibreWorlf often breaks things (repeatedly). Then proceeds to blame Mozilla Firefox, even when Firefox was still good. They seldom took responsibility for their own issues and always passed the blame, despite those issues being exclusive to LibreWolf.
     
     This only further hurt Firefox, because you had all these people saying, "just use LibreWolf" while also saying, "Firefox is the problem." But LibreWolf 100% depends on Firefox. They're a soft-fork who has made it clear, they have no intention of ever going independent. That means, when Firefox goes, so does, LibreWolf.
     
     I switched to Vivaldi Browser. It is everything Firefox should have been. Yes, it is Chromium fork, but they do not follow along with everything Google does. Not only do they include their own ad-blocker, but they worked with uBlock to include v3 support going forward, that works nicely alongside their ad-blocker. I even use Privacy Badger alongside both.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 23:37:43 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • 翠星石

     @Suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com @davidrevoy@framapiaf.org I would expect a GNU IceCat to be some sort of combination of a cat and a gnu tho

   • Embed this notice
     David Revoy (davidrevoy@framapiaf.org)'s status on Sunday, 02-Mar-2025 23:38:16 JST David Revoy

     in reply to

     • 翠星石
     • SuperDicq

     @Suiseiseki @SuperDicq 😍 Big potential for artwork this blue IceCat 💙

   • Embed this notice
     Simon Zerafa (simonzerafa@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 00:15:36 JST Simon Zerafa

     in reply to

     • Proton
     • Mozilla

     @davidrevoy

     @protonprivacy also flounced off Mastodon after they received well deserved criticism.

     Is @mozillaofficial doing the same? 🫤🤷♂️

     clacke repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     David Revoy (davidrevoy@framapiaf.org)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 00:15:36 JST David Revoy

     in reply to

     • Simon Zerafa
     • Proton
     • Mozilla

     @simonzerafa @protonprivacy @mozillaofficial I'm not sure how official the account you linked here is, the branding feels off and it's not really noted in the bio this is their official new account.

     Before December, Mozilla had their instance, and decided to remove it ( src. https://techcrunch.com/2024/09/17/mozilla-exits-the-fediverse-and-will-shutter-its-mastodon-server-in-december/ )

     Proton also really manage their PR like rotten potatoes imo ( https://theintercept.com/2025/01/28/proton-mail-andy-yen-trump-republicans/ )

     ... both company also abuse marketing bs wording and praise AI. Not surprising they are criticized here.

   • Embed this notice
     David Revoy (davidrevoy@framapiaf.org)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 00:15:45 JST David Revoy

     in reply to

     • Mad Dog Ace Run

     @BluesHarp But Vivaldi is not free/libre and open source software... This is even not an option on my operating system as it is really impossible to know what Vivaldi dev are doing with your data.

     clacke likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Mad Dog Ace Run (bluesharp@musicians.today)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 00:15:46 JST Mad Dog Ace Run

     in reply to

     @davidrevoy
     Vivaldi right now and it works great.

   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 17:55:55 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @Linux_Is_Best @davidrevoy It's actually possible to configure firefox to make 0 spying requests and as a result, if you install GNU icecat or Tor Browser, you don't get spied on.
     
     Auto update checking can be disabled on firefox, but I'm not sure about Brave or Vivaldi.
     
     >If you want safety and security and most importantly, privacy, you go with Vivaldi.
     You will never get safety, security or privacy with proprietary malware.
   • Embed this notice
     Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux (linux_is_best@misskey.de)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 17:55:57 JST Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux

     in reply to

     • 翠星石

     @Suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com @davidrevoy@framapiaf.org Because Firefox and Brave are open source malware, spyware, adware, and calls home like a lost child wanting their mother. And while Vivaldi is not open source, it calls out to check for updates, Widevine updates, and bug reports for a total of 3-4x in the whole day, as opposed to the 4x per hour or more that Firefox and Brave call out, continuously. If you want safety and security and most importantly, privacy, you go with Vivaldi.

   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 20:45:31 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • 夜化
     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @Yoruka @davidrevoy @Linux_Is_Best It is impossible to trust proprietary malware and baiting with proprietary malware should cause a total loss of reputation (alas people don't know better).
     
     No browser should be proprietary, whether it uses chromium or not.
     
     No software should be proprietary.
   • Embed this notice
     夜化 (yoruka@eientei.org)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 20:45:33 JST 夜化

     in reply to

     • 翠星石
     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @Linux_Is_Best @davidrevoy @Suiseiseki I have 0 reasons to trust Vivaldi. They might have reputation and they make proper requests that's all nullified when the program is not free. A browser that merely uses Chromium should not be proprietary.
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 20:52:30 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • 夜化
     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @Yoruka @davidrevoy @Linux_Is_Best There is no problem with selling free software; https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#selling
     
     If someone personally wrote a whole browser engine in GNU C, with full HTML5 support that doesn't support JavaScript, and released it under the AGPLv3-or-later, I'd be happy to pay $20 equivalent in XMR for a copy (although I might try it out from a copy shared from someone else first).
     
     Yes, the main reason why proprietary software developers refuse to make software even source-available is because doing so would reveal the malware.
   • Embed this notice
     夜化 (yoruka@eientei.org)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 20:52:32 JST 夜化

     in reply to

     • 翠星石
     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @Suiseiseki @davidrevoy @Linux_Is_Best I mean maybe you made a whole ass browser engine and you feel so proud about it you sell it for 20 bucks. Just know I and probably no person would ever use it. From what I hear the Vivaldi devs REJECT making the browser free which does make me wonder why. Probably because it contains undesirable code there is no other explanation.
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 21:08:45 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • 夜化
     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @Yoruka @davidrevoy @Linux_Is_Best Free means freedom and has nothing to do with gratis (although you can easily construct; free of charge); https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#four-freedoms
     
     Nonfree and proprietary are two words for the same things.
     
     You can make plenty of money with free software - whether that's custom software or support (few people even make money from binaries of free software, like Ardour, although such practice is now mostly obsolete, like icemen).
     
     Although, it is impossible to make a fortune and become a billionaire without multiple crimes against humanity, for example making software proprietary and for some reason people see becoming a billionaire as a good thing rather than a bad thing.
   • Embed this notice
     夜化 (yoruka@eientei.org)'s status on Monday, 03-Mar-2025 21:08:46 JST 夜化

     in reply to

     • 翠星石
     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @Suiseiseki @davidrevoy @Linux_Is_Best Oh you mean commercial software, I don't really know about that. If you can find a way to make money without purposefully fucking over your customers I'm fine with it
   • Embed this notice
     夜化 (yoruka@eientei.org)'s status on Tuesday, 04-Mar-2025 11:18:35 JST 夜化

     in reply to

     • 翠星石
     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @Linux_Is_Best @davidrevoy @Suiseiseki Good software is software that doesn't abuse you. I cannot trust software that have something to hide in its source code
     翠星石 likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux (linux_is_best@misskey.de)'s status on Tuesday, 04-Mar-2025 11:18:37 JST Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux

     in reply to

     • 翠星石
     • 夜化

     @Yoruka@eientei.org @davidrevoy@framapiaf.org @Suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com I care about good software.
     
     Some good software is free, others paid, some are open source, and others are closed source. None of that determines if it is good or not.

   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Tuesday, 04-Mar-2025 11:20:17 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • 夜化
     • Moved to https://mk.absturztau.be/@Linux
     @Linux_Is_Best @davidrevoy @Yoruka You won't see this as you're a coward, but good software by definition needs to at least respect the user.
     
     Imagine defending proprietary software by referring to it as "closed source".