@ntnsndr I guess I don't see the process that this would support. In my experience tech supports and enforces good process. If you don't know the process or have that dielled in that it doesn't matter what tech you pull in.
@ntnsndr i think the idea has promise! But between auto deleting posts, server weirdness, etc, feels like it would be important to capture things another way.
Also it’s really hard to just read a mastodon conversation with tons of people
@ntnsndr I like this idea in theory. I often forget to check Loomio, and it would be nice to keep track of governance issues here.
I think the main impediment to this would be the fact that Mastodon doesn’t do threaded discussions well. I feel like it would be unwieldy to keep up with a particular discussion that we may be interested in.
I’m open to it, though, and would love to see a proof of concept.
Another thought: is there any way to do a Loomio/Mastodon connection through RSS?
Personally, I would advocate in favor of a rotating role to call people's attention to Loomio posts via #SocialCoop itself.
I would prefer to use something like Discourse over Loomio -- I find Loomio needlessly convoluted in a bunch of ways -- but more than that, with any separate platform I think we have to find ways to direct our collective attention there.
@ntnsndr I like that idea. Move the discussion and voting to where the people are already at. Showcasing out democratic deliberations to the rest of the fediverse might inspire other instances to do the same.
@ntnsndr no! We’ve been focusing on the new frontend. If you know of any good backend devs who would be interested in taking this on tho, lmk. I should have some funding.
That looks super interesting. If you have funding, the first person I would reach out to is https://hachyderm.io/@thisismissem - she is already working on trust & safety tooling for the fediverse, and may have ability to take on additional paid work.
@ntnsndr I have two concerns related to basic organizing principles: when a group is already doing something that aligns with your strategy and values, don't start a new project that competes, and we need to practice intercooperation at this level. Dissipation is the enemy of solidarity networks, right?
@Matt_Noyes I really like Loomio, but I have consistently heard members say they find it hard to use an follow. I don't think values should have to be painful. And I think it is important to be a space of experimentation.
@ntnsndr@Matt_Noyes maybe this points to a need for better onboarding and clarity about how we use Loomio? I am not convinced that the tool is the issue here tbh. I've seen Loomio work well for groups when there is a shared understanding of the protocols for using it. If anything the "drawback" to Loomio is its high degree of customizability, which can be a liability when groups don't have clear decision-making protocols or cla consistent culture of agreements.
First: Yeah, tech is not the solution for anything! I agree that, practically, the most important issue for us is not tech but process and structure. I am very enthusiastic about the re-organizing work going on now.
Second: I'm mostly just scratching my itch of a) wanting to learn how to build Mastodon bots because I like Mastodon, and b) being interested in governance tooling. I am not under any illusions that it would likely be as awesome as Loomio.
@Matt_Noyes@arod@ntnsndr I've got to be on the upper end of social.coop members in knowledge of Loomio and interest in governance, but I still find myself largely ignoring social.coop's Loomio discussions. I only have so much cognitive energy for it, and there aren't quick, clear ways to plug in. It's not a tool issue for me, it's a how-does-this-group-use-the-tool issue. For those less familiar with Loomio, it might be both, but solving one doesn't necessarily solve the other.
@shauna@Matt_Noyes@arod And just as a reminder, I'm the person who has probably done more Loomio on-boarding writing than anyone in the co-op:) I would love some company!
@shauna@Matt_Noyes@arod Maybe a rephrasing of the question: Is there anything that our governance and community needs from a bot in addition to Loomio?
@ntnsndr@shauna@arod Or even, ccould a bot help us integrate loomio and mastodon such that members can more easily participate in governance and community-building?
@Matt_Noyes@shauna@arod For sure. I could definitely try adding functionality to the @SocialCoop account to publish Loomio activity, for instance. How's that for a start?
@ntnsndr@shauna@arod@SocialCoop Is there a way to use RSS? I sometimes think that all we need is the ability to add links to the main mastodon interface, the way you can add links to your profile.