Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:26:41 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

   • NEETzsche
   • ?? Humpleupagus ??
   • Omega Variant
   • Deplorable Degenerate
   • :suihead:
   I've posted this often enough. You can choose not to believe God is real. I can lead you to water, but I can't make you drink. What you can't do (at least not in good faith) is discount clearly recorded history that stands in opposition to popular narratives as if they lied about what they carved into stone explicitly to mislead people thousands of years in the future.
   
   There was an actual tribe of people who claimed to descend from Israel (the man). These people were recorded as being exiled by Assyria, and the names they were known to other nations makes it clear who they were and who they weren't. To pretend Israelites are desert niggers, or "jews" is factually incorrect.
   
   But NEET thinks he is clever (he isn't) and likes to lose at arguments to me.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:26:41 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:

     >But NEET thinks he is clever (he isn’t) and likes to lose at arguments to me.

     You mean like all those times you try to insist that Christianity isn’t a univeralist faith even though it is and I correct you on it? Like those times?

   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:30:39 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:

     You’ve certainly attempted to demonstrate that it isn’t universal, and failed. Do we really need to humiliate you again in this respect?

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:30:40 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     I've effortlessly demonstrated it isn't universal. You're just too dumb to understand simple logic.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:38:34 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:

     The Gospels explicitly state in various places that all who believe in Christ are saved and those who do not are not saved. It’s universal.

   • Embed this notice
     Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:38:35 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     It's not.
     
     Jesus makes it pretty clear he came for his sheep (Israel).
     
     That isn't to say he won't have mercy on those who try to follow Him. I sure hope there is a measure of mercy for them.
     
     But he literally told the woman dogs (outsiders) do not get the children's (Israelites) food.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:41:39 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:

     No it’s pretty explicitly to everybody.

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:41:40 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     You are the guy who would go up to a family reunion in the park and ask for your ice cream cone, because one of the people asked
     
     >Who would like an ice cream?
     
     Clearly, she was only speaking to her family, not to anyone in ear shot.
   • Embed this notice
     Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:49:07 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     There are places that also explicitly imply otherwise as I have just stated.
     
     
     So something don't add up then. Either it's contradicting or we don't understand it.
     
     Since we know the Word is infallible then it must be us. So then one must ask, who is he referring to when he says "all". Perhaps it was supposed to be understood as all of Israel. Since that is who he was addressing?
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:49:07 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:

     No serious theologian believes in absolute biblical inerrancy or infallibility, so let’s just dispense with that casually. The Gospels are not the inerrant Word of God. They are literally second-hand accounts from disciples. They are eye witness testimony.

     That being said, the theme of universalism in Christ’s own words in the Gospels are more than “explicitly implied,” as you put it. They’re just explicit. Outright.

   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:50:55 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:

     You literally have no argument and you’re calling me dumb? You claim to be a literalist, yet reject the literal word of the document you’re ostensibly a literalist of.

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:50:56 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     >Be the people who God says "only you have I know."
     >He gives you prophesy and nobody else
     >The prophecy is only for you, pertaining to you
     >He gives you no reason to think he cares about anyone else but you
     >Be NEET
     >Think he meant street shitters and niggers.
     
     I know NEET is not actually White, but jeez man.
   • Embed this notice
     Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:50:56 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     I truly hope there is mercy for people who aren't but try to follow his ordinances.
     
     But that isn't not my place to say.
     
     NEET is just dumb, he was dumb before I even held this position.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:52:58 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:

     >be literalist >reject a recurring theme that gets literally restated many times over >”LOL LAMOA YOU SAID YOU’RE NOT A LITERALLIST YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID”

     :laughingimps:

   • Embed this notice
     Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:52:59 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     >Bible isn't infallible
     >Gospels are just like, your opinions man
     >Still quotes Bible
     
     You just absolutely demolished anything you have said or ever will say. Lol
     LMAO you made that way to easy.
     
     Duces.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:55:10 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     I look like both of my parents. I'm pretty sure I'm not adopted, guys, or the agency was really good at matching families. 😏
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:55:11 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     All of the race of Adam will be resurrected, but the glory is for Israel. People who try to pretend that Hams kids were black, or that Shemites are yellow are just coping. Tell me which tribe of Japheth you came from. How come nobody can answer that? If they are the Europeans, tell me who and how.
   • Embed this notice
     Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:55:11 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     I have no idea who I defended from tbh. I just am a typical White looking dude 🤷
   • Embed this notice
     PeachySummer (peachysummer@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:56:55 JST PeachySummer

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     @Humpleupagus @Sui @NEETzsche @Omega_Variant @Xenophon @Deplorable_Degenerate
     You don't have to be in denial about it, bud. They still love you no matter what.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 16:56:55 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • PeachySummer
     • :suihead:
     So I should accept they're my real parents? Why shouldn't I always leave an out?
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 17:43:29 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     The verse in Mark he quoted isn't in the Novum Testamentum Graece. It started to appear in texts around the 5th or 6th century AD, but is absent from all of the older ones. So God didn't say it, and Mark didn't write it.
     
     The Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus also end at Mark 16:8
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 17:43:29 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     It's fascinating that you're reduced to trying to argue that Mark doesn't count. Sorry I went AFK to voice chat with one my magazine's contributors.
   • Embed this notice
     Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 17:43:30 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     Stay mad.
     
     You just revealed your true colors and BTFOed yourself you idiot 😂
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 18:37:37 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     Most religious scholars don’t even think that the four canonical Gospels were written by Mark, Luke, Matthew, and John themselves, much less God, and are instead based loosely on oral tradition, compilations of miracle stories, and so on. I don’t agree with that, to be clear, but I can convey to you what your average biblical scholar thinks.

     Anyway, the fact of the matter is, the theme of Christ saving all of mankind or all who believe or some other similarly universal variation, is replete with the four “canonical” gospels. It’s well-understood that this is the case. Only people who haven’t even read them don’t know about this. It appears over and over again in various forms.

     Xenophon even tries to argue that everything in Mark 16 past verse 8 doesn’t count. He desperately, desperately wants Christianity to be a Whites-only religion, to the point of outright rejecting chunks of KJV as scripture at all.

   • Embed this notice
     GabeLakmann (gabelakmann@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 18:37:38 JST GabeLakmann

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     If you want to go by that standard then technically ALL of the Bible is "second hand."
     
     If the Old Testament is the Word of God then so is the New Testament.
     
     And most "serious theologians" DO believe the Bible is correct, they just believe that some people have incorrect interpretations of it, even themselves sometimes if they're honest and reasonable.
     
     How can one person, yourself, be wrong about so much so often?
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 18:41:18 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     >KJV isn't scripture
     
     Cope
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 18:41:19 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     >Xenophon tries to argue that text that wasnt in Scripture doesnt belong in Scripture
     
     Lmao, you are so stupid mate.
     
     I dont desperately want anything. I dont particularly care. I say what I say because it's true, not because it affects me
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:05:11 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     Youre so dumb its astound. It isnt me who is saying it doesnt belong you faggot. It literally doesnt belong.
     
     >The evidence is clear. This ending is not found in our earliest and most reliable Greek copies of Mark. In A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, Bruce Metzger writes: “Clement of Alexandria and Origen [early third century] show no knowledge of the existence of these verses; furthermore Eusebius and Jerome attest that the passage was absent from almost all Greek copies of Mark known to them.”1 The language and style of the Greek is clearly not Markan, and it is pretty evident that what the forger did was take sections of the endings of Matthew, Luke and John (marked respectively in red, blue, and purple above) and simply create a “proper” ending
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:05:11 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @Xenophon You're* it's* astounding*
     
     So anyway, is this what you're resorting to now? Copy pasting paragraphs from random web pages you won't even link to in lieu of being corrected scripturally? This is legitimately pretty funny
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @GabeLakmann @Omega_Variant @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     GabeLakmann (gabelakmann@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:14:54 JST GabeLakmann

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     When you resort to critiquing typos first instead of the subject matter, you've already lost.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:14:54 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @GabeLakmann How can I lose when I won? His argument is that the Bible isn't Christian scripture. It's preposterous on its face, and if he's going to be disrespectful in addition to being wrong, it merits nothing short of abject ridicule.
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @Omega_Variant @Xenophon @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:18:19 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @Omega_Variant So, which is it? Are you a lireralist (I'm ultimately correct about Christianity being a universal faith, per the Bible) or are you not (this idea that being a literalist is oh so ridiculous is just wrong, per you)? You can't have both. I mean, you can choose which L you take, but you're taking at least one L tonight
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @GabeLakmann @Xenophon @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:18:20 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     I thought it was hilarious back there where you quoted scriptures but then said the Bible is basically unreliable.
   • Embed this notice
     Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:21:56 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     You tell me, is the Bible the infallible word of God or is it not?
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:21:56 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @Omega_Variant I asked first. If you refuse to answer, you take both Ls.
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @GabeLakmann @Xenophon @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:23:35 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @GabeLakmann I've taken zero Ls tonight. I seem to recall you're the guy who tried to argue that Mike Enoch admitting he's a Jew multiple times and on different occasions doesn't count.
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @Omega_Variant @Xenophon @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     GabeLakmann (gabelakmann@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:23:36 JST GabeLakmann

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     How many "L's" are you trying to take tonight. You've already got at least two. Are you trying for a record or something?
   • Embed this notice
     Omega Variant (omega_variant@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:24:19 JST Omega Variant

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     Lol, that's not how that works. It's whatever though, your a Mormon. Ultimately your opinion on the Bible doesn't matter as you rejected the moment you became a Mormon.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:24:19 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @Omega_Variant That's exactly how it works. Looks like you've chosen both.
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @GabeLakmann @Xenophon @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:27:31 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     >Ive taken zero Ls tonight
     
     Except for quoting forged scripture. :pepe_shiteatinggrin:
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:27:31 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @Xenophon >KJV is forged scripture because it isn't e-wignat enough
     
     :laughingimps:
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @GabeLakmann @Omega_Variant @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:44:29 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     No,it isnt,because your premises are wrong. You have yet to establish that Christianity is universalist without appealing to authorities outside of the bible. Show me OT prophets that support your position. Demonstrate that the "gentiles" Paul wrote to werent Israelites. You cant do either.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Aug-2023 19:44:29 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @Xenophon I have though. Over the course of our correspondence, I've cited many different verses to the same effect: Christianity being universal. Every time, you find some hill to die on to protect your precious racialist view of this religion. In this case, it's impugning the authenticity of Mark 16:9+.
     
     I could get into the weeds with you on Mark if I really wanted to. I could do things like bring up Irenaeus' citation of Mark 16:19 in Against Heresies, which is direct evidence of its authenticity. But really, I don't want to. Why?
     
     Because I know that the real issue to you is not any of this. The real issue to you is that I can bring out all kinds of scripture directly saying that all who believe in Christ are saved or that Christ will save all flesh or something to that effect, and for each of these, you will come up with a different, ad hoc cope for why it doesn't count.
     
     The truth is, you WANT Christianity to be a White ethnoreligion that basically excludes non-whites. So you can't be convinced otherwise. You will twist yourself into knots no matter what scripture actually says on the topic. It's amusing.
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @GabeLakmann @Omega_Variant @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 02:56:30 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     Irenaeus:
     > It is not possible to name the number of the gifts which the church, throughout the whole world (cf. Mk. 16:15), has received from God, in the name of Jesus Christ.”
     
     The mark citation here is eroneously added by the person who wrote this to suggest he was making a direct quote of Mark, which there is no indication that is the verse he was referring to, but you'll miss the more important part. Ireneaus is stating that the church had already extended through the whole world. Martin Luther also made this claim. The whole world to them is not the planet, nor was it the whole world to Jesus.
     
     >20 Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing.
     
     The world to Jesus was Jerusalem and the surrounding land. It is not for you to imagine what He cared for. The purpose of the witnesses of the bible is that they give you the answers. There is zero indication in any biblical text that the scope of anything one might call "the world" meant the entire planet. There is even less indication that what 1st centuries Aryans called a "man" included Incans, Mayans, Chinese, Aboriginals, black Africans, etc. Your universalist view is corrupted by your pozzed modernist view of humanity. I'm sure because you aren't actually White and you're malding about it, but that isn't my problem. The fact is, nobody considered brown people to be "humans." They were considered to be savage animals. Even Jesus called a Canaanite woman a dog, and Canaanites are decided Aryan/Adamic.
     
     Cope and Seethe, NEET.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 02:56:30 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     Mk 16:15 refers to “every creature.” It’s questionable if this is even limited to humans. It’s certainly not limited to certain races of humans. You are the one coping lmfao.

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 02:56:31 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     You were seething when you wrote this, weren't you. Christianity is not a religion. It is a covenant between God and the children of Israel. This is the entire purpose of the bible, and is repeated over and over. I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand this.
     
     As to Mark 16, you repeat a common theme, being too stupid to understand things. You also imagine I stand alone on a hill saying that Mark ends at 16:8, when in fact you can find any number of universalists who are making these arguments for me. Whether Irenaeus was familier with it's existence or not is immaterial. The fact that it wasn't present means the common believe is that it didn't belong. That's how logic works. In fact it's also how a belief in the divinity of Gods word works. If the long ending were supposed to be there, the exemplar would of had it, and the copiest would have written it down. They didn't.
     
     But I'll take a page out of your faggy handbook.
     Which long ending. There are at least 2. You need to tell me which one is the truth and why. No matter which one you select will disprove your point. Choose wisely. Failure to pick means that neither belong and you lose. Selecting one over the other means that neither is truly the word of God, because both add to something that many claim wasn't even there, and claim to be true, which itself can't be true.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 02:58:38 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     Good morning, everybody!
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 03:03:18 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     >There is zero indication in any biblical text that the scope of anything one might call "the world" meant the entire planet.
     
     You mean aside from the part where he explicitly tells us to teach and to baptize all nations? To be clear "all" means "all," not "all, except most of them."
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 03:54:29 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     >False. All nations refer to the Genesis 10 nations.
     
     No, "all nations" refers to "all nations." As in all of them. As in not a certain category of nation, but all of the nations. This is a reading comprehension issue on your part and I don't know why you're insisting on this.
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 03:54:30 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     False. All nations refer to the Genesis 10 nations. All of which are Adamic. Which Genesis 10 nation do chinks come from? How about the Comanche?
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 04:37:51 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     >This is a reading comprehension issue on your part
     
     No, it isn't. It's a reading comprehension on your part. You insist on pretending that people outside the scope of the narrative are somehow included in it, especially when I have demonstrated that people such as Irenaeus, whom you want to refer to, believed "the whole world" had already been reached.
     
     The world doesn't mean the planet because you want it to. All nations doesn't mean everything a 21st century American thinks is a man. You cannot augment the context of ancient text to suit your views. You must use a historicist lens and accept the words as they were understood by the people who wrote them.
     
     According to the bible, the only nations that exist came from Genesis 10, so if you want to include someone into "all nations", you need to tell me which Genesis 10 nation they originate from. If the Comanche aren't from Ham, Shem, or Japheth, then they aren't a nation according to God. They are little more than animals.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 04:37:51 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @Xenophon This idea that if you haven't heard of a Nation it isn't included in the phrase "all nations" is a hilarious cope. It's literally the "oh you're saying this religion is for everyone? name every nation ever" meme come to life
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @GabeLakmann @Omega_Variant @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 08:46:28 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     Things NEET has said
     
     >A translation of a later copy of an ancient text is more accurate than the oldest known copies of the text
     >I will cite an early church father as a source to the claim that my version of the text is correct. Not that it merely existed, but that it is the true source, even though I can only cite one person potentially claiming this.
     >That same person is not a viable source for your claim that "the world" doesn't refer to Incans and Native Americans, even though it clearly doesn't.
     >In fact, I reject your entire claim and state that "the world" mean the entire planet and everything on it, even though nobody for the last 5000 years meant this.
     
     Why do you think the Genesis 10 nations are in there? Where do you find the hubris to claim that the bible says something other than what it means? I can quote multiple OT prophets who in an english translation refer to "the world" and it not meaning the entire planet. I can quote the Gospel writers doing the same thing, referring to "the world" as the Roman empire alone. If other peoples were unknown to them, how in your tiny little brain can you assume they were referring to the unknown in their text? In fact, in some places the Greek grammar makes it clear they cannot be referring to things they have no knowledge of.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 08:46:28 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @Xenophon God is omniscient. Christ would not say "all nations" if he meant "the nations listed in Genesis 10." Christ would not repeat variations on this several times over. Christ referring to "all nations" or to "all people" or what have you is not just one or two cherry picked verses that I can pick out. It's something He said over and over again. I trot these quotes out one by one so you can look dumber and dumber as you reject more and more of the Bible. So far you've rejected Mark and Matthew. Do you reject Luke?
     
     So far in this exchange you have attacked the authenticity of canonized scripture, redefined "all" to mean "not all," and suggested that God's knowledge is limited to what people in Jerusalem at the time would know.
     
     Why do you keep trying to argue that God meant something other than what He said? I think we both know.
     
     @Sui @Humpleupagus @GabeLakmann @Omega_Variant @Deplorable_Degenerate
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 10:02:10 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     Why "nations" and not "people"? A "nation" is a political concept that was not know to Native Americans at the time Christ was alive.
     NEETzsche likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 10:12:40 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     Christ says “nations” and “people” and “flesh” and so on at different times. What’s clear is the all-inclusiveness of it, hence the use of the word “all.” This is why I bring up how it isn’t a cherry picked verse but a recurring theme. This idea that “all” only includes things previously mentioned is like saying that the claim that Christ will revive all flesh doesn’t apply to those who haven’t been born yet.

   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 10:34:57 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     Xenophon thinks that “all” means “not all” and that 50% != half. Christ promised to save all who believe in Him. Paul thought that meant everybody who believes in Him, but Xenophon doesn’t.

     Xenophon also likes to assume that he knows what God’s opinion on your personhood is. He said all will come whether slave or free, but thinks blacks aren’t people. Laughable.

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 10:34:58 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     NEET thinks God is a jew and He tricks people. He promised Abraham he would bless his offspring. Abraham did think that meant people he had no idea existed, but NEET does.
     
     NEET also likes to assume that he knows what Gods opinion on your personhood is. He called a Canaanite a dog, but thinks God things blacks are people. Laughable.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 10:39:13 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     From a theological standpoint, is this a person? 🤔
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:00:39 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     It's not like she could stop you.
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:00:40 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     wood.
   • Embed this notice
     GabeLakmann (gabelakmann@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:00:41 JST GabeLakmann

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • :suihead:
     Almost?
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:04:45 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     You're so stupid, you think those are Luke's words. That is John the Baptist quoting Isaiah.
     
     >4 as it hath been written in the scroll of the words of Isaiah the prophet, saying, `A voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, straight make ye His paths;
     >5 every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be made low, and the crooked shall become straightness, and the rough become smooth ways;
     >6 and all flesh shall see the salvation of God.'
     
     Isaiah was a prophet of Israel. He only wrote concerning Israel. He didn't write concerning anyone who was not a son of Jacob. You have no context for your claims, and that's why you constantly fail. You imagine you can create context, but you aren't charismatic or smart, so you can't. Sorry nerd.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:04:45 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     I never said those are Luke’s words. The verse is definitely from Luke, as in the Gospel of Luke, though. So, you reject Luke. Got it. We’ve got you rejecting Luke, Mark, and Matthew. Those are all three of the synoptic Gospels. Let’s see if you reject John.

     Apparently Christ said that anybody who believes in Him will have everlasting life. Do you think this is the case, or do you reject John as well?

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:12:48 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     >So, you reject Luke. Got it.
     
     You're literally a retarded nigger.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:12:48 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     So, Christ right here says that all who believe in Him will receive everlasting life. Do you think this is true or do you reject John?

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:17:12 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     You are so fucking stupid it's unbelievable. Those aren't Jesus's words. but these are.
     
     >20 Jesus answered him, `I spake freely to the world, I did always teach in a synagogue, and in the temple, where the jews do always come together; and in secret I spake nothing.
     
     So clearly, according to Jesus, the world means People in Palestina in the first century AD.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:17:12 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     No, those are Christ’s words. So, in John 3, Christ says all who believe in Him will have everlasting life. Do you agree with this, or do you reject the Gospel of John like you reject the Gospels of Luke, Mark, and Matthew? This is the final time I will ask. Your options are:

     1. Yes, I accept the Gospel of John. Christianity is a universalist faith
     2. No, I reject the Gospel of John. I reject Christ’s words. (default if you refuse to answer or try argue that John 3 says something other than what it says)
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:26:58 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     You have chosen to reject all of the canonized Gospels. You rejected Luke. You rejected John. You rejected Mark. You rejected Matthew. All of them. So in what way can you call yourself Christian?

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:26:59 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     It's funny you think you can define the premise. This is why you keep losing.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:29:23 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     I cited the words of Christ to your face you rejected them. You are projecting. Is there anything else before I mute this thread or are you satisfied with your self-imposed condemnation?

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:29:24 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     You reject the clear word of Jesus, and you're a mormon. In what way do you call yourself a Christian?
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:33:15 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     He also spoke to Pontius Pilate, who definitely didn’t spend a lot of time in any synagogues. Looks like you’re committed to your malds. Goodnight.

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:33:16 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     I cited the word of Jesus to your face and you rejected them.
     
     >20 Jesus answered him, `I spake freely to the world, I did always teach in a synagogue, and in the temple, where the jews do always come together; and in secret I spake nothing;
     
     It literally says "Jesus answered him" right there. Jesus told you what hte world is. Jesus didn't say it was the fourth planet from the sun that would eventually be called "earth". He said it was the people in the land of Canaan. Cope, seethe, mald. You lose.
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:40:58 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     So... you're not going to mute my thread, that you interjected your fat ass into. Obviously.
     
     So what do you actually think Jesus is saying here? Let me guess. That anyone can believe in Him? You are so stupid.
     
     James 2:19
     thou -- thou dost believe that God is one; thou dost well, and the demons believe, and they shudder!
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:40:58 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     The Epistle of James aren’t the words of Christ. Those are the words of James. Since your reading comprehension is beneath middle school, to separate the words of Christ from the words of others, I recommend paying attention to the color of the text in your KJV Bible. The red text are the words of Christ in the New Testament and the direct words of God in the Old Testament. The rest are whoever else’s words.

   • Embed this notice
     Parker Banks (parker@pl.psion.co)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:42:28 JST Parker Banks

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     @Xenophon @Sui @Humpleupagus @NEETzsche @GabeLakmann @Omega_Variant @Deplorable_Degenerate
     Not reading this whole thread, but If the Bible was as simple as "passage X says Y" then there would be no theological disagreements or different denominations. But we're all citing English versions of Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic texts that have multiple ways of being translated, were written in a completely different cultural context to us reading, and contain cultural references we have little knowledge of. So it's rarely as simple as asking "do you agree with verse X?".
     NEETzsche likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:43:05 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • Parker Banks
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     I agree with this. It’s why I pointed out multiple times that permutations of the same idea (Christianity is open to all who believe in Christ) are repeated many times in the Gospels, and phrased in many different ways. And in other parts of the New Testament not in the Gospel.

   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:46:04 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     I never said KJV is the direct word of God. I said it’s scripture, and it is. It’s probably the most authoritative translation into English of these ancient texts, which you reject because it doesn’t confirm your incorrect racialist interpretation of the Bible. Goodnight.

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 11:46:05 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     I already quoted Jesus and you ignored in 3 times. You are a disingenuous brown kike. You aren't an intellectual. you're a mouth breathing faggot. You have no understanding of history, no context of the bible, you can't even understand how infallibility works vis a vis the word of God. You're a child who thinks the KJV is Gods word (LOL This will never stop being funny) instead of it just being one of many translations into a language that can't adequately do justice to the supporting text.
     
     I even showed you how the word "love" is incorrectly translated and you ignored that as well. You have a chip on your shoulder because you are brown, and the irony is you decided to become a member of a church that LITERALLY agrees with me and thinks White people are the true Israelites. You are a laughing stock.
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 12:37:37 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Matty
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     Torahnic Judaism and Rabbinical Judaism are ethnoreligions. Christianity is not. It’s universal in that anybody can be a Christian. He spent the whole thread saying those verses to the effect of “all who believe in Me will be saved” and “venture forth to all nations and spread the Gospel” and so on don’t apply to anything except the ones listed in Genesis 10. Which is uh, not correct.

   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 12:37:38 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Matty
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     I'm sorry you wasted your time.
   • Embed this notice
     Matty (matty@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 12:37:38 JST Matty

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     I have no idea what the fuck either of you are talking about either way. Lots of references to people I've never heard of. I'm surprised you aren't a KJV loyalist but then again I suppose the KJV is just another translation of the original text, some of which meaning I guess is lost in translation. Perhaps then, discernment is important. I'm not sure if I believe that Christianity is a White only faith, or rather a covenant between God solely and the Israelites per your opinion, but I could not argue for or against the merits. I would like everyone to be saved, regardless. But if it's not up to me, it's not up to me. /shrug
   • Embed this notice
     Matty (matty@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 12:37:39 JST Matty

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     That was quite the read.
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 12:37:40 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     Kill yourself nigger.
   • Embed this notice
     Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits (xenophon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 13:10:58 JST Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits

     in reply to

     • NEETzsche
     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Matty
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:
     Do you reject the covenant that God made with Abraham? Do you reject the promises to Israel? Do you reject that Jesus is the Messiah of Israel? Do you reject that all Israel will be saved, as the bible says?
     
     This is why you're a fool. You want to start halfway through the story and argue words meant for specific groups of people as if they are meant for anyone who reads them. If it is universal, why wasn't God concerned with saving the Assyrians and Babylonians before Jesus. Why wasn't He concerned with saving anyone outside of White Europeans after Jesus? For 2000 years, East Asians, africans, and americans died without a savior. In your version, God is evil and vindictive for keeping salvation from these people. Your view is a giant cope. You reject hte foundational texts of the Bible, but you think you have the right to coop something that was never meant for you (because you are brown). But that's fine. Jesus still doesn't know you. You will be tossed out from the wedding banquet.
     
     >11 But when the king came in to view the guests, he saw a man there who was not dressed for a wedding. 12 So he said to him, ‘Friend, how did you get in here without wedding clothes?’ The man was speechless.
     >13 “Then the king told the attendants, ‘Tie him up hand and foot, and throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’
     >14 “For many are invited, but few are chosen.”
     
     
     You reject Gods own words in that He married Israel, and only Israel. You think God commits adultery with non-Israelites. You are a blasphemer.
     
     >9 And I tell you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”
   • Embed this notice
     NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Aug-2023 13:10:58 JST NEETzsche

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • Matty
     • Omega Variant
     • Deplorable Degenerate
     • GabeLakmann
     • :suihead:

     Case in point.