You were seething when you wrote this, weren't you. Christianity is not a religion. It is a covenant between God and the children of Israel. This is the entire purpose of the bible, and is repeated over and over. I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand this.

As to Mark 16, you repeat a common theme, being too stupid to understand things. You also imagine I stand alone on a hill saying that Mark ends at 16:8, when in fact you can find any number of universalists who are making these arguments for me. Whether Irenaeus was familier with it's existence or not is immaterial. The fact that it wasn't present means the common believe is that it didn't belong. That's how logic works. In fact it's also how a belief in the divinity of Gods word works. If the long ending were supposed to be there, the exemplar would of had it, and the copiest would have written it down. They didn't.

But I'll take a page out of your faggy handbook.
Which long ending. There are at least 2. You need to tell me which one is the truth and why. No matter which one you select will disprove your point. Choose wisely. Failure to pick means that neither belong and you lose. Selecting one over the other means that neither is truly the word of God, because both add to something that many claim wasn't even there, and claim to be true, which itself can't be true.