Notices by Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) (tokyo_0@mas.to), page 2

@drose Thanks — I was procrastinating, but now I'm going to get up and do some housework 😅

via @Patricia (https://mas.to/deck/@Patricia@vivaldi.net/112604279303366552, retooting to add CW)

"tech people often forget about intimate partner abuse. But protecting against someone who is regularly in physical proximity to your devices is a whole other thing. Often requiring many layers of protection, because it might not be safe to refuse them access. Another reason why the Microsoft Recall thing is an absolute dumpster fire. And a reason to not have a windows machine if they do release it."

@forteller like others have said, to survive a reboot you need some way to come back up. That kind of mechanism is called “persistence” - these kinds of vulnerabilities have become progressively harder to find in phone OSs, so the price for a good one (with an exploit) can be in the millions of dollars range. But if they are found they could potentially be fixed by the vendor. So they are used carefully. Otherwise it’s money out the window. So unless you are a high value target they probably won’t risk using it for you. And without persistence, reboot will clear it. Of course you have all sorts of spyware you (or someone with access to your phone) might’ve installed on purpose, but that’s another matter.

@maxineinyourwifi @gabboman (Looks like I'm quite late to your toot so I'm hoping you haven't been on the brink of a panic attack for the past six hours 😬 )

@maxineinyourwifi @gabboman I read recently about breathing for five counts in and another five out to activate the parasympathetic nervous system (the one that calms you down). The important part is to breathe out for slightly longer than you breathe in, to expel carbon dioxide. Breathing deeply helps too. The slow pace is to avoid hyperventilation I think but anything slower than normal should be enough.

And if you're in a panic attack type situation I would suggest self-distraction, too.

@EvilKiru @LivingCooki I'm kind of unsettled that you can do this. Should it be possible to do this? 🤔 😅

@mark_melbin Ah, I see the angle now — thank you. Yeah, I guess she could be. Or just exploiting a potential propaganda opportunity. It's an interesting idea, for sure.

Are we ready to decarbonise yet?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QtZz70rh6U

No? Some more pain first? Ok, then.

#climateChange #climateCrisis

"Meta notes that you can’t reply to replies 'yet,' so it sounds like that feature will arrive in the future."

https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/25/24185226/meta-threads-fediverse-likes-replies

They could build #Threads in a few months. The single function of being able to see #Fediverse replies has taken almost a year—and you can't interact with them.

If you think this is someone operating in good faith, there's a bridge I'd like to sell you.

#FediPact #Meta

👣🧘♀️ LOTUS LOVE🪷😇

As rainy season deepens lotus plants emerge from the muddy beds of ponds, reaching above the waters to unfurl giant leaves.
In a few short weeks alien landscapes appear where once there were only bare stretches of water.

In Kyōto 'kanrensetsu' (観蓮節), 'lotus flower viewing', coincides with the culmination of the Gion Matsuri...almost as if the flowers have appeared to welcome the gods of Yasaka-jinja into the city.

#Kyoto #京都 #lotus #ハス #蓮 #Japan

Cat trap was delivered, in-laws set it up with food. Yuzu (what we've decided to call the orange and brown cat that seems to be Mugi's littermate) went in, ate all the food, and left because it's too light to set off the trap! So they set it up again with a weight on the trap, and sure enough, within 20 minutes, they caught a cat. A different cat. 😂

This one seems to be related to Mugi and Yuzu, about the same size with a similar face, but brown striped with a white belly.

@mark_melbin Which part is "throwing him under the bus"? She's misrepresented his motivations? Or the comment about nothing changing? Or is some of this new information that would be relevant to his case?

@retrosponge @mayaisloading Was going to write the same thing 🙌

@trumpet The instances would still be authorized, no? Afaik they're not marked as bad actors right now (and from their point of view they're working as intended, too). I don't think what's being done is malicious, either. It's just a problem with how the Fediverse works right now.

@trumpet That happens here, too 😅 Yeah, it was Google I was looking at. You were right, though — there are other (non-Mastodon) instances besides GNUSocial that seem to be doing the same thing.

@fbievan Yup. Building like this is hopeless. Nothing is ever more secure than its most vulnerable point. There needs to be much more coordination between developers to get these kinds of things lined up. I think there's going to be a new version of ActivityPub at some point soon - maybe that'll take care of some things. I don't hold out much hope though.

@fbievan That's the thing. I really think the length of time the Fediverse has existed, this should probably already have been addressed. And if for some significant reasons that hasn't been possible, now would be a really great time to address it 😅 How many years to they need?

@fbievan I think the fundamental design of how the Fediverse works is being tested in this and similar ways across the board right now, because presuming good faith unless proven otherwise isn't scalable. Having more and more users but relying on the same number of admins to police abuse isn't scalable (even though it means there are more mods here than in conventional centralised services). And if something isn't scalable, magic thinking ("it'll be fine") won't make everything fine.

@fbievan I agree it probably isn't going to be fixed. But I absolutely think it should be. It should be possible to share posts so that they can be found via hashtags across the fediverse without having to make them web-public. It should be possible to share posts instance-only. And having other instances respect whether content should be indexed should be part of the good-faith expectations of peer instances across the fediverse. Otherwise all the promises and guarantees are just utter tosh.

@fbievan And while perhaps they didn't very specifically say that wouldn't happen, I'm just so sick of this "yeah, yeah it's a great platform in all these ways (except from these very evident design flaws we don't tell you about and carefully word around to never explicitly mention, and don't fix, and never talk about)" nonsense. There are so many things that are not as they should be. Even the "block domain" option on the standard Mastodon web interface doesn't actually block the domain.