Notices by cobratbq - cranky-by-design (cobratbq@mastodon.social)

@Gargron still a man of few words. 😋😄

@whitequark @niconiconi you might want to start questioning the reliability of the information you're getting.

@whitequark @niconiconi are you intending to respond to current events?

@puniko this isn't 'cats'. Should this be translated to 'cadence'?

@thomasfuchs I am aware of 10y of ongoing malicious intent. I know their is an agenda. I know people deliberately misrepresent and misattribute for their malicious agenda, because I caught them explaining such actions. They look for excuses to attack or otherwise fabricate them. I *know* they searched for reasons to attack in everything. They prided themselves on that shitty behavior.
Pretending that abusive people are "confused" after 10y is rather pointless.

@puniko kein? ("kein stress"?)

Hi @EUCommission do you know that the "Up-to-date link" to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, points to a broken link, claiming that it does not (or no longer) exists.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/char_2012/oj/eng

I assume this one's still valid. 😁

@cjd okay, so AMD and Nvidia owned by same extended family. That's an impressive feat.

@bagder okay, and how many requests for backdoors?

@puniko (un)predictable water flows are awesome

@puniko what are you responding to?

@puniko do you need to grasp so strongly, or is it only a habit? Could be smth to unlearn. (Even if it might feel necessary.)

Let's be clear: I cannot comprehend your level of stupidity.

There are 2 implementations, at github: 'otr4j/otr4j' (java) and 'cobratbq/otrr' (rust), I heavily annotated (a fork of) the spec at 'otr4j/otrv4' and pointed out a lot of subtleties, there is a prototype submitted on the otr mailinglist with no further response. There is 'otr4j/echonetwork' to test jitsi/otr4j and otrr and otr4j for compatibility/interop.

You people don't care. You are only interested in abuse.

It's one huge series of excuses such that you don't have to admit that you were wrong.

You only care about the abuse, and have done everything possible from the start to avoid looking at the facts and the results.

But, let's be realistic. It was all finished, i.e. to a working demonstratable interoperating state, long ago. You only care about the harassment, because you don't dare to engage in anything meaningful.

This is, in no way, new information. There are a number of related projects and results.

The big dumb object you all fear, is logic more strictly separated and controlled in distinct states. The work you expect is prone to errors in case of inaccuracies.

Strict separation forces the developer to think of proper distribution of logic as opposed to hoping that all the if-statements are correct, complete, properly placed and correctly handle all possible combinations of events.

And don't forget that the other project, a bitcoin wallet on a security device, is also in a functional state. (Though never tested on production bitcoin chain.) Though, it isn't sufficiently progressed for higher planned threat levels, yet.

It may not be the perfect solution for all cases, but it still has interesting properties and full control over firmware and software is possible. Although def. still in development and NOT prod- and user-ready yet.

WHY DO YOU THINK I AM TAKING ACTION? NOBODY LISTENS.

IT HAS BEEN CONTINUOUS, PERSISTENT, ARBITRARY ABUSE.

And #ASML can go to hell with the rest of you. They knowingly and willingly participated in this to attack me.

All of you are just too self-satisfied with participating in the arbitrary abuse. It's fucking obvious this is all a set up to fuck up my life. Why do you think I'm swamped in false accusations?

Nobody cares about me. You all chose hate and contempt. I am not the problem.

None of this is new. It's all been said at least 4 times by now.

I spoke about doing 'otr4j/otr4j' and I did. I did otrr to learn rust. I made the echonetwork to prove interop with existing work for both libraries. I wrote the prototype, based on nostr, because it could allow for better properties in hiding contacts.

ZERO RESPONSE.

I am not the problem. I never was the problem. You people are.

It's arbitrary abuse.

And a reminder that I am not part of the group that did the funding proposal. I had zero obligations, but did all this. But I certain have no obligation to also write a complete chat application on Android just for the sake of your abusive shitshow.

I NEVER MADE ANY PROMISES. And certainly not to you abusive people.

But, you people aren't quite up to date. The most recent excuse is that it is excessively complex, because they don't understand software engineering and don't ask.