@shantini At a certain point I just have to wonder: How do they find harassment targets so fast? Do they not do anything else with their lives?? Are they just…like…cyborg trolls living in underground vats who do not eat or sleep, but just search for harassment targets through the internet cables that go directly into their brains?
Important detail: it’s not clear that accuracy is a goal of the poll. The group is not actually conducting an academic research project at all; they are a student-run “strategy consulting organization.” Sort of like Model UN but for McKinsey, I take it. Given that, I suppose this malformed poll is functioning exactly as it’s supposed to function, and giving true-to-life experience.
@jenniferplusplus Yeah, of course you’re correct: the best con artists believe their own con, or are incapable of actual belief altogether — and you’d think I’d know that after all these years of Musk and Trump and blockchain and crap
@jenniferplusplus Yes, push poll is a relevant thought! The thing I can’t tell is whether the poll authors know they have an agenda, i.e. is the sucker here me or them?
I feel like there’s a classic social science and/or philosophy term for the way a question can circumscribe its possible answers, and thus skew our thinking. What is that? It escapes me. Whatever it’s called, this is a classic example.
You can see the students’ assumption / agenda plain as day: “The only barrier to AI utility is unfamiliarity! Therefore we can help these poor benighted educators by making them familiar with it!”
“People tried it and it sucks” is not a thinkable thought.
Got a survey from a Berkeley student group who are “researching how AI-powered tools can support educators like yourself by improving teaching efficiency and the learning experience,” and started filling it out just out of curiosity…
…but bailed on the survey when I reached this (mandatory) question. The correct answer for me, not present, is “I rarely use it •because• I am very familiar with it.”
@mcc True story: my college roommate’s dad spent a year at a research station in Antarctica, where various random scientists from all over the world were stationed. They had a hot tub, and would amuse themselves by running straight out of the hot water into the sub-sub-zero temps really fast for a second and then running back inside…
…and that is how the dad has a photo of himself standing outside in the snow in Antarctica with •Wernher von Braun• both completely buck naked.
Some much-needed optimism from @Impossible_PhD — not denial of just how bad the big picture is in #uspol, but a sober-headed assessment of some details that matter. Is she correct? I don’t know, but she sure does have a point.
If you’re feeling any sort of sense of defeat and unalloyed hopelessness, read the thread.
John Stoehr on why Trump is appointing monstrosities to his cabinet:
"Among liberals, the discussion seems to be limited to the absurdities each of these people brings to governance as well as the dangers they pose. 'Yes, shake your head at the seeming absurdity of these picks,' wrote MSNBC’s Jen Psaki. 'But don’t stop there.'"
Composer, pianist, programmer, professor, rabble rouser, redheadComputer Science at https://www.macalester.edu/mscs/(Student projects: https://devgarden.macalester.edu)Artistic Director of https://newruckus.orgFreelance dev, often with https://bustout.comMusical troublemaker https://innig.net/music/The heart is the toughest part of the body.Tenderness is in the hands. — Carolyn Forchésearchable