I went ahead and read the article (pic related) on this debate in the 1500s about whether women are human.
It has it all: anon shitposters, feminists, equalist libtard simps, equalist professors, women literally getting away with murder, and a shitpost which was reprinted for nearly 200 years (your shitposts will never).
Here are some excerpts:
In early 1595 there appeared anonymously in central Germany... "Disputatio" [which] professed to be a satirical mimicry.
If some of the dissenters in Poland, the author contended, could believe on the basis of the Bible that Christ, the Son of God, and the Holy Spirit were not divine, he was free to conclude, also according to Scripture, that women were not human
During procreation, man was the causa efficiens; woman, merely the causa instrumentalis. If a smith forged a sword with the help of a hammer, the hammer remained his tool. It did not become a member of his body.
This headline was countered at once by Simon Gediccus (1551-1631) with a broadside entitled Defensio... He subtitled his Defensio a "refutation of the most trashy tract in which an anonymous jester assaults the human nature of the feminine sex."
In public pronouncements the professors warned their students and the young that the mere thought women were not human was poison to the mind, and Lutheran preachers denounced the Disputatio accordingly.
The publisher of the pamphlet, Heinrich Osthausen, was subpoened and testified that the manuscript had been sent to him by Valens Acidalius (1567-1595).
By 1639, the dispute had "passed from the schools into the conversations of the best companies" in Holland, where the physician John Beverovicius (1594-1647) wrote another Defensio sexus muliebris in which he 'verified by a thousand examples, that women were not inferior to men in any qualities, either of mind or body.'
But the exchange between Acidalius and Gediccus did not only stay in print for 174 years. It also was widely imitated and plagiarized.
An impudent student at the University of Cologne tried to repeat the arguments of the Disputatio before an audience of outraged mothers, who are supposed to have beaten him to death with the chairs on which they had been sitting. This cruel and unusual punishment was declared just and deserved by an expert on criminal court procedures professor Johann Harprecht
Adrian Baillet counted Acidalius in 1688 among the child prodigies of poetry and scholarship.
In spite of his intense devotion to his male friends..., Acidalius was not a misogynist.
What then prompted Acidalius to get involved with raising publicly the question whether women were human? It was the pestering of his publisher. Acidalius sent him a hand-written copy of the Disputatio, which had been circulating among his friends.
he was confronted with its leading question by the female attendants of a banquet. Acidalius disarmed the ladies who were waiting for an answer with their plates in both hands ready to break them over his head with the whisper that they were angels.
The threat of theological ostracism is supposed to have driven Acidalius into a state of frenzy (phrenesis) in which he committed suicide.
Late Humanist scholarship as a way of life which minimized women was evidently the cultural corridor through which the Disputatio passed from study to study, amusing the learned behind closed doors.
@VidMasterEon@LouisConde@Hoss the problem with that subreddit is that they seldom mention the race of the children. Sometime you can read between the lines.
Some of the children were in this case (see point 6)
I still remember having a student who was just a constant thorn in my side. Rude, mouthy, disrespectful… pick a word, he was it. He got sent out a lot at one point because I couldn’t honestly handle his disruptions. So one day, he tells me to fuck off because I was racist POS. Off to the office. Three minutes later he comes back with a cocky smirk on his face with a note for me. It read “stop sending students to the office. You’re doing it too much.”
Whatever vestige of authority I had vanished like a fart on the wind after that. I was the problem, not the asshole little banger who made it his mission to mess with my classroom. There is nothing more demoralizing than admin who back the students because they want you to be friends with the students.
Fuck that. I’m supposed to be their teacher, not their buddy. I survived, but it left some pretty deep scars on my psyche.
young white female gay male teacher complains about rapid student behavior deterioration. Makes a good case for homeschooling
(don't feel too sorry for him, he appears to be into drugs, lgbt, and game of thrones)
How much has student behavior changed in the last decade?
here's a list of some things I've noticed:
I cant get the class to be quiet for even 5 minutes for me to go over attendence/instructions for the day. They don't even make an effort to discreetly talk, they'll have a full blown conversation I can hear from across the room. By the time I walk over and tell them to be quiet, another group will start talking.
Complete lack of respect for authority, with some kids being straight up non compliant. Majority will agree with my request, but still continue whatever it is they were doing the moment I turn my back.
Constant commentary on anything I say. I told a loud kid to stop screaming, and another told me "that's not actually screaming". Why are you giving your input??
A host of destructive behavior. Slamming computer mouses, mostly when they are playing a game and rage when they die/lose. Throwing papers/pencils/anything they can get their hands on. A student keeps unplugging all the cables from the back of computers not being used. Male students always try to rough house by grabbing eachother or trying to wrestle.
Constant slurs, especially homophobic or sexist ones, this especially bothers me as a gay man.
Accusing me of racism when I try giving discpline. A girl told a loud student to be quiet, he told her "shut up bitch", I inquired why he said that & he told me she said the N-word. When i tried asking her about it he left the class without permission. I locked another students computer for using profanity, and he said I did it because he's black.
@mangeurdenuage@Moon >create an invidious instance >have your friends follow their channels on it now you kind of see what your friends are watching (or at least what their feed looks like) obviously this doesn't account for non-followed watches (e.g. once off viral videos from a small channel)
@lain@Hoss@Moon >the moon landing is a White achievement >the current system is anti-White if it was fake the system would tell us to demoralize and degrade White people
I've add some examples (see pics) of "dissident" or "controversial" websites.
The creator justifies it by going after the Q cult (easy targets). Who knows if he is being cynical or sincere. > If you for example point the website explorer to the fringes of politics, it will map that web-space with terrifying accuracy.
> Note again how few of those websites are actually indexed by Marginalia. Only those websites with ‘MS’ links are! The rest are inferred from the data. On the one hand it’s fascinating and cool, on the other it’s deeply troubling: If I can create such a map on PC in my living room, imagine what might be accomplished with a datacenter.
> You might think “Well what’s the problem? QAnon deserves all the scrutiny, give them nowhere to hide!”. Except this sort of tool could concievably work just as well as well for mapping democracy advocates in Hong Kong, Putin-critics in Russia, gay people in Uganda, and so forth.
@Moon don't let her know your domain yet - you want to make sure she likes you for reasons besides being the owner of the oldest active fediverse instance
If you take a screenshot of a Tweet or a news article, then add the link to the screenshot:confederateflag: BANTS1 Timothy 2:12Check my pinned post for links to interesting websites18 July 1290 was a good day#nobot