Notices by Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org), page 2
-
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Monday, 16-Jan-2023 08:10:10 JST Corfiot apparently boobs help you use dedicated controllers to manage your fleets better when you hands are busy panic clicking or something -
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Jan-2023 07:34:16 JST Corfiot @lain his followers claim it's chaotic good but I suspect it's chaotic evil -
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Tuesday, 06-Dec-2022 08:49:03 JST Corfiot @alex best way to get journos on board: have a waiting list -
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Thursday, 01-Dec-2022 11:22:54 JST Corfiot @tk This guy is polling fedi for his "research". His "research" started innocently and it's now clear he's against everything fedi is built to avoid. Monetization(the bad one), centralization and speech control. He's a covert authoritarian. Look at these suggestions:
> The feature requests are:
> 1. Turn off comments
> 2. Lock comments
> 3. Approve comments
> 4. Flair profiles
> 5. Adjust crowd control
He's prolific and he's mixing good takes with malicious takes masquerading as an innocent to stay in the conversation. We'll see what his instance will look like in 6 months, probably a forked authoritarian hellscape is my guess. -
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Nov-2022 19:58:57 JST Corfiot @Moon -
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Nov-2022 19:58:55 JST Corfiot @Moon #ItsAlwaysPleroma (forgot the hashtag lol) -
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Monday, 21-Nov-2022 01:50:51 JST Corfiot @alex @masstransitkrow @Gargron
I see your point, still a single guy wanting to make a small patch will not fork the whole thing. He'll go for the pull request.
If that is not approved THEN he'll probably fork and use his fork but it'll be basically just a running copy, until a merge conflict happens and then who knows. So the 100 forks are good, but not effective as the 5 notable/big ones.
If the dev has time to make many patches, I say yes, get on board with one of the 5 major forks from the start and deny the original project the feature as a way to force change. -
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Monday, 21-Nov-2022 01:41:49 JST Corfiot @alex @masstransitkrow @Gargron he still has to approve the PR tho. Not everyone can maintain a fork and (let's face it) it's gonna be ignored unless it's supported by a whole team. -
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Monday, 21-Nov-2022 01:32:21 JST Corfiot @alex "feature hydration" wtf is wrong with us -
Embed this notice
Corfiot (corfiot@pleroma.elementality.org)'s status on Sunday, 20-Nov-2022 10:22:18 JST Corfiot @evan @howsen
This is an interesting initiative, I got here through reading about monetization of fedi.
Why 50%? Why misrepresent your potential audience in the board? Unless your target audience is not the whole but the minorities, in which case again I'd say 50% sounds arbitrary and minorities would complain that other minorities or over-represented eventually.
How about making sure you have at least ONE of each minority you are targeting and apply decision making rules to allow veto? This would require a more numerous board, as well.