Notices by ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)
-
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Saturday, 02-Nov-2024 08:44:00 JST ryan This Presidential race has divided America in two: Citizens who love America versus those who hate America. The former group is, fortunately, much larger, and it shouldn't even be a close race. But the latter group is joined by criminal aliens and countless dead and fictional voters. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Saturday, 02-Nov-2024 08:43:58 JST ryan @wjmaggos I've been told I have a big mouth, but I don't think it's big enough for all the words you're trying to put into it.
> everybody who disagrees with you
Not even remotely true. This hyperbole borders on making me wonder if you're invoking Poe's law. I am generally civil to the people "who disagree with me". I do think they're wrong (hence why I disagree), and tend to tell them that, which I admit is off-putting to a lot of people, but I do not attack them personally for it.
But civility gives way to imminent danger. When you find an arsonist with a gas can and matches outside your home, you don't stop and invite him in for a spot of tea and friendly debate on the merits of whether your house should remain standing.
I have been very clear in every message that I am speaking of the US Democrat Party and of those people who pledge fealty to it. The party has abandoned your precious "liberal" values in favor of authoritarianism, globalism, and, dare I say it, fascism (yes, the old definition of the word, not the new redefined one that just means "Trump") The only 'freedom' that Harris ever speaks about is abortion, and that only because they can use it to politically divide the country.
As an aside, your support for the people trying to unite us under One World Government pretty much puts to lie everything you preach about decentralization. Decentralization is about local autonomy in all levels, including nationalism in the face of globalists, and states' rights in the face of federalism.
And, come to think of it, you've never explained how your support for someone *literally installed by oligarchs* and who never won one single primary squares with your purported love of "democracy", no matter which definition of democracy you use.
The Democrat Party is 16 years into selling out America's soverignty to globalist oligarchs, and four years deep in the dismantling of America's once-strong economy. This is not some kind of up-for-debate future prediction. It has LITERALLY BEEN HAPPENING under Democrats. Yes, anybody who supports that agenda is trying to burn down my country, and I am tired of trying to be civil to them.
I'm no Republican (and if you call me one, them's fighting words), but at this moment in history, the best thing about them is that they're fractured. Most everyone from the eras of Bush and Reagan hate Trump. Newer ones like him. There is no unified driving force, no matter what people say in their ultra-woke facebook rooms. When that happens, power transfers to the local level. It decentralizes.
Like it or not, the Democrat Party is unified (so much so they DIDN'T EVEN HAVE A PRIMARY!), and the direction they are going is toward global government and socialism, two things that will destroy America. I wasn't being hyperbolic on that point.
> rather than a guy who promotes critical thinking etc.
Says the person who publicly supports a vapid airhead communist marionette whose hidden puppet-masters are destroying everything I ever loved about my country, and the only reason you know how to give is "Oh, her opponent is a bad man!" Real critical, there.
Listen, we can have civil debate about liberal values. Believe it or not, I actually support quite a few of them. Especially if you use the old (and accurate) definition based on "liberty".
But if what you're looking for is someone to pander to your delusion that there's good people on both sides, and really if we just got rid of Trump, the oligarchs running the Democrat Party would turn around and abandon their global totalitarian ways and go back to loving liberty and social and economic freedoms and listen to the will of the people, then look elsewhere. I'm not picking up what you're laying down. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Saturday, 02-Nov-2024 08:43:54 JST ryan @wjmaggos
tl;dr: My uncivility has always been for the Democrat Party, who is authoritarian and censurious and globalist and are, in practice, anathema to everything liberal, democratic, and decentralized that you claim to love, but whom you publicly support due to inertia, ignorance, and TDS.
You mischaracterized this as "everybody who disagrees with you" -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Oct-2024 03:07:25 JST ryan Spending has gone WAY past the need to cut government budgets or programs. We need to start cutting government departments. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Monday, 14-Oct-2024 04:33:15 JST ryan @freemo There's a distinction between following a formal Religion, and being religious. The latter is about conviction of faith and worshipping something larger than yourself. The former involves associating yourself with a formally defined group of people who organize around religious principles.
Most "atheists" satisfy the latter definition of being religious, but still claim to atheism because they don't generally follow a formal religious organization.
That said, some of the woke socialists and the climate cult come close to satisfying the religious follower definition as well. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Monday, 14-Oct-2024 04:07:08 JST ryan The vast majority of people who claim to be “atheist” merely don’t realize that what they worship - be it rocks and minerals, or The Universe, or Climate Change, or Karl Marx - are religions in all but name. The most vocal atheists are the most fiercely religious zealots you will ever meet.
-
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Sunday, 13-Oct-2024 11:25:02 JST ryan Immigration is a positive force when immigrants are obliged to assimilate into their new host culture. This includes things like following the new cultural norms and leaving behind practices that are abhorrent to the host culture, while still bringing new ideas and perspectives. It also includes learning the local language, which is critical for assimilation.
This melding of new and old is what creates the good kind of diversity that makes a culture stronger through evolution. Like every evolutionary process, it is necessarily slow, as people take time to adjust to new norms.
Immigration without assimilation, on the other hand, creates enclaves of a foreign culture within the original. This is the bad kind of diversity. These incompatible cultures, in proximity with no geographic boundaries, lead to strife, crime, violence, and eventually cultural breakdown.
Importing too many immigrants in a short period of time - or worse, actively pandering to the foreign culture in these enclaves - removes the incentive to assimilate, virtually guaranteeing this result.
-
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Sunday, 13-Oct-2024 11:24:59 JST ryan @wjmaggos I talk about cultural evolution, and you make it about Trump. I guess that's the default Democrat party line these days.
If it wasn't for Trump Derangement Syndrome, Harris wouldn't have a platform at all. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Tuesday, 24-Sep-2024 08:41:53 JST ryan KYC has been one of the most beneficial trends in decades for online scammers.
By training the public that they must enter their true personal data into every online prompt, KYC has enabled uncounted opportunities for identity theives and grifters. Opportunities that would never have appeared, if the public were instead trained to be cynical of someone who demands an SSN, name, address, or phone number just to sign up for social media. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Monday, 26-Aug-2024 01:28:04 JST ryan @wjmaggos All I hear is "I want this censored for *everyone* because *I* don't like it." People who promote server-level censorship don't even see the slippery slope they're diving headfirst down.
As Raymond Chen was fond of saying, imagine if everybody did this. Freedom of speech doesn't exist because of content that everybody likes. It exists to protect content that someone *doesn't* like, because not everybody likes the same thing, and because without freedom of speech, eventually someone with power - someone who doesn't like the things that you like - will come in and force what *they* want onto you.
"But this particular content is universally bad! Nobody should like it!", you might say, because you literally didn't comprehend the previous paragraph. There are people out there who would say exactly the same thing about abortions, transgenderism, climate change, and women's suffrage. I guarantee there is someone out there who thinks *those* topics are universally deplorable and should be censored. Who are you to decide what everyone else may see, when that other person can't?
This is a problem that is fully solvable with user-level content filtering. Letting users choose their own level of participation for themselves is the ONLY equitable way to do it. Everything else is just forcing your own sensibilities onto others. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-Aug-2024 08:49:33 JST ryan Once-universal skills that have been lost in just the last 25 years:
- Handwriting
- Reading an analog clock
- Counting change
- Reading a map (ie: navigating without turn-by-turn directions) -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 14:13:17 JST ryan Fact: Every single government DEI program violates the First Amendment's clause prohibiting establishment of religion. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Thursday, 01-Aug-2024 05:11:13 JST ryan Ever follow someone because they seem to be pretty good in their one narrow lane, but once you do, you start regretting that decision because they keep swerving out of that lane and straight into retardville? -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jul-2024 04:25:19 JST ryan Right-wing cults:
- Train in secluded compounds
- Members don't realize they're in a cult
- Worship Jesus Christ
- Don't care what ideology non-members follow
- Just want to be left alone
- Get murdered in government FBI raids
Left-wing cults:
- Train in public schools and universities
- Members don't realize they're in a cult
- Worship Karl Marx
- Become violently offended if non-members follow a different ideology
- Seek to control and convert everyone else
- Are the ones who do the murdering -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 08:17:27 JST ryan Third election in a row the "Democratic" party has disregarded the will of the people and anointed a candidate from on high. No Democrat supporter has any right to complain about the loss of democracy EVER AGAIN. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Saturday, 01-Jun-2024 02:42:10 JST ryan @wjmaggos @nam @Dhowjen
This argument represents real progress. Congratulations.
It took four years, but the left is finally moving past Denial of election fraud, and have moved on into the Bargaining stage. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Saturday, 27-Apr-2024 08:56:00 JST ryan I know I'm showing my age when I recall to younger people the bygone era, when technology was created to serve mankind, rather than the other way around. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Apr-2024 11:17:31 JST ryan You're all wimps for using "special" glasses for watching the eclipse. When the eclipse started, I stared straight at the sun with uncovered eyes with no ill effects.
At least, I think it was the right direction. Hard to tell with all that cloud cover. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Apr-2024 01:44:50 JST ryan @meowski Sorry, that wasn't directed at you specifically; more of an "if-then" statement.
Things like pronouns and bathrooms are "positive" rights, similar to the "right" to free housing or free broadband. They are not really rights, because they can only be granted by forcing compliance from (aka: removing rights from) someone else. -
Embed this notice
ryan (ryan@bemrose.social)'s status on Monday, 01-Apr-2024 11:30:23 JST ryan Seeing a lot of anti-trans backlash in my feed.
It's an understandable response to wokeists raising up the transgender demographic like they're some sort of sacred calf. They've taken a lifestyle choice and turned it into a religious icon in their war on culture.
But: When ridiculing the ridiculous, please note the distinction between trans activists and trans LUTFAs.
All of the idiotic and culture-destroying bullshit, all of the woke DEI policies, the byzantine rules and laws about pronouns - everything that makes big news - comes from the *activists*. They deserve the firehose of your scorn. Please, open the taps.
Just remember that most people (transgender included) are not activists. They want no involvement in this cultural jihad being pursued by the commies and marxists. They just want to live their lives outside the limelight. Sound familiar?
No matter how much you disapprove of their appearance, or disagree with their life choices, at the end of the day, remember they're still people. At least give them the respect for that.
In other words: don't be the bigot that the activists claim you are.