I don't normally say anything about the terrible things happening in the Middle East right now. This isn't because I don't care, I care very much. It's because other people have far more useful things to say, I have nothing worthwhile to contribute. And also, I don't want to have to deal with replies.
But this particular matter is something that's been bothering me and I have to get it off my chest, sorry. It's this:
In the media, I overwhelmingly see Israeli attacks on Beirut and other Lebanese cities described as attacks on Hezbollah.
An attack on Beirut is an attack on Lebanon. Hezbollah is not Lebanon. Hezbollah is not the Lebanese government. Hezbollah is not the Lebanese people. An attack on Lebanon is an attack on Lebanon. An invasion of Lebanon is an invasion of Lebanon. Lebanon is an independent, sovereign state - yes, one in which some terrorists live and operate, but that is true of many countries.
During the Troubles, there were many supporters and funders of the IRA in parts of the US. Does that mean that Britain should have invaded America and have it described as an operation against the IRA? I'm sure nobody would think that makes any kind of sense at all.
If Israel invades a sovereign independent state, then it should be reported as that. Lebanon is not Hezbollah. The Lebanese people are not Hezbollah. They are being punished, killed, because they happen through no fault of their own to live in the same country as some terrorists.
I'm just really pissed off by this, it's not okay at all.
Okay, that's off my chest, I'll go back to talking about music and rain and sandwiches and stuff. I just had to say something somewhere. Sorry.