Notices by Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com), page 3
-
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 07:57:11 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche @latein @rdr Serious question: Are you autistic? -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 07:31:46 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche @latein @rdr No. Not because I agree or disagree, I just don’t give af. It does seem emotional though. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 07:21:56 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche @latein @rdr You’re being ridiculous. Because you were specifically avoiding the plausibility angle, I’m not allowed to bring it back up? Quit playing, retard. It makes plenty of sense, you just don’t want to answer for it. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 07:17:25 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche @latein @rdr I read the whole thing. You’re making an ethical case, but that’s actually not the main issue he raised, plausibility is. Plausibility is the better argument against the LDS by far, which is why I brought up the Book of Abraham, a very specific case where we have a *lot* of information that simply does not add up. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 07:07:42 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche @rdr @latein >Mormonism is no crazier than the Old or New testaments taken at face value.
Well, except that whole “Book of Abraham” debacle, where we found the original “source” and it turned out to be a completely unrelated Egyptian Book of the Dead.
Counterpoint, though. Joseph Smith accurately predicted the American Civil War. That one made my head spin when I learned about it. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 03:04:25 JST Microchimera @rees @olmitch @bot @mangeurdenuage She won't accept mine either and we're best e-friends. bot is mean. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 03:04:21 JST Microchimera @ssorayaa @rees @bot @mangeurdenuage @olmitch To be fair to Rees, haven’t we all done that? -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 03:03:43 JST Microchimera @newt @pressure @bot So you just ask random women out to cofe with no intentions?
I don’t believe you. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 01:09:40 JST Microchimera @cowanon @Grumblesock Technically is still exists, you can download it from their (Gitlab?) and it still works, but no one uses it so there’s no point.
I’m sort of (but not really) the reason the final version got taken down and the whole thing, browser and extension, was retired. They let the browser sit out of date for over a year, and Chromium had important security breaches in that time, but they were still advertising it on all their pages. So I told the CTO, who I was well acquainted with at the time “Fosco, you fucking idiot, if someone gets hacked through this thing, Gab is going to get sued. If you can’t update it, delete it.” -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 00:42:09 JST Microchimera @theorytoe @meowski @alex @lamp 💯 -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 30-Aug-2023 00:21:34 JST Microchimera @djsumdog @alex @meowski @lamp It’s actually not very funny to saw off the branch you’re sitting on.
There’s nothing wrong with having fun or a little trolling, but when you’re so obnoxiously toxic that you’re an active detriment to what could be critical communication infrastructure in the future, it’s not funny, it’s just sad.
We’re not on /b/. We’re allowed to care and I refuse to pretend the image board attitude is cool. /b/ is shit. /pol/ is shit. We can do better. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 15:57:12 JST Microchimera @rdr @NEETzsche NEET is a schizo (a little more schizo than you're letting on, even) but it's not productive to be rude about it. Why can't you let a civilized conversation happen in peace? -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 15:50:30 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche I've never seen one of them address Ezra and Nehemiah. I don't think many of them have read it.
If you have, there's simply no way you can hold to these esoteric racial theories of what Christianity. The genuine ethnicity of Jesus' opponents was never even in question. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 15:46:26 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche I'm just used to seeing pagans and ethnonat atheists attack Christianity (and Islam) for being "universalist" so I'm pointing out there are multiple senses of universalism. One is the predicate for any useful truth claim, the other is an abdication of reality. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 15:46:18 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche The whole British Israel thing is strange, especially the ones that claim modern jews are ethnic Edomites.
There are two whole books of the Bible about establishing the racial purity of the ethnic jews; Ezra and Nehemiah. That's what sets them apart from the lost tribes, who are lost because they mixed races with their conquerors.
They've flipped the entire reality on its head. It can only come from Biblical illiteracy. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 15:38:39 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche It's universalist in the sense that truth is objective, and there is an objectively true path to redemption no matter where you come from.
There's nothing wrong with universalism, in that sense.
Christianity is not universalist in that we believe the innate characteristics of the races, genders, etc. are moot. That would be silly. There are some passages that are unfortunately vague enough to be taken that way, but when you read old commentaries and look at how the early Church actually worked, it clearly wasn't received in a manner compatible with modern liberalism. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 15:33:06 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche Even that is leaving a bit out, because for most of history, Christianity, for all intents and purposes, was the religion of Romans. In the Byzantine empire, it would not have necessarily been incorrect to conflate your citizenship with your faith. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 15:32:44 JST Microchimera @NEETzsche Strictly speaking, it is about race mixing. The sin of both Israel and Judah were mixing with the peoples around them (which caused them to worship other gods, modern people will try to disconnect these two things, but they're always paired together in the Old Testament.)
Xenophon is a bit of a heretic though, to my understanding, he believes the New Testament is a racial covenant, which Paul consistently refutes. That doesn't mean race is irrelevant or doesn't exist, but it is no longer a barrier between Christian brothers, so a modern application of Ezekiel would be to avoid mixing with non-Christians. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 15:25:44 JST Microchimera @apollo222 Ezekiel 23 is about the people of God mixing with other nations. It's a good passage but I don't think it has much to do with egirls lol
It would be relevant to ecumenism, though. Like, the Pope courting Muslims and Hindus, for example. Ezekiel 23 is a condemnation of that.
The Bible does speak on what makes a woman virtuous. Proverb 31 is the best example. -
Embed this notice
Microchimera (opphunter88@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 14:34:55 JST Microchimera @Omega_Variant @Leaflord @n3f_X @bot I’m sorry you didn’t like it