Fediverse proves that if nobody is tipping the scales to artificially boost "engagement", toxic people end up being blocked. Mainstream social media toxicity is not inevitable, it's a business decision, a choice. And Fediverse chooses not to have any of it.
For a long while now I've been thinking that technical organizations that have to deal with spurious / BS abuse reports should simply charge a processing fee against the frequent sources of these BS abuse reports.
After a second shitty report, they get an e-mail about what was shitty about it and that if these points are repeated in their next abuse report, they will be invoiced.
> A [cyberthreat actor] has allegedly stolen a massive trove of sensitive data – including highly classified defense documents and missile schematics – from a state-run Chinese supercomputer
> The dataset, which allegedly contains more than 10 petabytes of sensitive information, is believed by experts to have been obtained from the National Supercomputing Center (NSCC) in Tianjin
A cold-war superpower with a permanent seat on the UN Security Council is committing what will likely be seen as a war crime – targeting civilian rail infrastructure of a much smaller and weaker country – and it's not Russia blowing up trains in Ukraine this time.
There used to be a time when building out a botnet required *some* work – writing exploits, taking over devices, obscuring the purpose of the executable, etc.
Not any more!
Instead of "malware", call it an "AI agent" and people will just happily install it on their devices with full root privileges! https://github.com/jgamblin/OpenClawCVEs/
> Someone still has to reread, compare, test, contextualize, and sometimes rewrite. And if no one seriously takes on that work, the cost does not disappear. It reappears later in the form of errors, urgent fixes, loss of trust, and eventually litigation. What is presented as a productivity gain is often just an accounting displacement.
A huge military power launches "major combat operations" (not calling it a war), against a much, much smaller country, that is supposed to take just a few days. It is now taking many times longer.
One of the pretexts used for that operation is to force a change of government in the much smaller country.
The attacked much smaller country is able to successfully constrain access of the huge military power and its allies to an important body of water, blocking oil exports through it.
The huge country is apparently preparing for an assault on an island of the smaller country on that body of water.
The island is roughly within artillery range from the small country's mainland.
Hacker, activist, free-softie ◈ techie luddite ◈ formerly information security and infrastructure at https://isnic.is/ and https://occrp.org/ ◈ my opinions are my own etc.(he/him)⁂profile image: drawing of a head and shoulders of a cat-person, in a space suit.banner image: long-exposure photo of a large tent, brightly illuminated from inside, looking as if it is made of lava #foss #libre #privacy #infosec #fedi22(public toots CC By-SA 4.0 if applicable)🇪🇺 🇵🇱 · 🇧🇦 🇮🇸 · 🇺🇦