Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Tobias Fiebig (tfiebig@wybt.net)'s status on Sunday, 12-Apr-2026 01:48:30 JST Tobias Fiebig

   in reply to

   • Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

   @rysiek I actually started to do that to a DMCA takedown thing. Only stopped after I cc'ed finance to ask for their invoice address, insisting that them continuing to send (repeated, timed out) reports after I told them the next one will be charged was essentially agreement to my terms.

   • Embed this notice
     Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 (rysiek@mstdn.social)'s status on Sunday, 12-Apr-2026 01:48:32 JST Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

     in reply to

     @tfiebig I am facing my palm.

     For a long while now I've been thinking that technical organizations that have to deal with spurious / BS abuse reports should simply charge a processing fee against the frequent sources of these BS abuse reports.

     After a second shitty report, they get an e-mail about what was shitty about it and that if these points are repeated in their next abuse report, they will be invoiced.

     After the third, they get invoiced.

     Rich Felker repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Tobias Fiebig (tfiebig@wybt.net)'s status on Sunday, 12-Apr-2026 01:48:33 JST Tobias Fiebig

     There is just... SO MUCH... wrong with this.

     Rich Felker and Paul Cantrell repeated this.